Oncologic outcomes and subsequent treatment following organ sparing surgery for penile carcinoma: The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center Experience

被引:5
作者
Kokorovic, Andrea [1 ]
Duplisea, Jonathan [1 ]
Qiao, Wei [2 ]
McCormick, Barrett [1 ]
Adibi, Mehrad [1 ]
Papadopoulos, John [1 ]
Ramirez, Gabriela [1 ]
Rao, Priya [3 ]
Tamboli, Pheroze [3 ]
Pettaway, Curtis [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Urol, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[2] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Biostat, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[3] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Pathol, Houston, TX 77030 USA
关键词
SQUAMOUS-CELL CARCINOMA; CONSERVATIVE SURGERY; RESECTION MARGINS; LASER THERAPY; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1016/j.urolonc.2021.02.004
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Objectives: To determine the oncologic outcomes of organ sparing surgery (OSS) for penile cancer and to determine the management of and risk factors for local recurrence at a tertiary referral center in the United States. Methods and Materials: Patients undergoing OSS from 1996 to 2018 at The University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center were identified using a prospective database. Organ sparing procedures included: wide local excision (WLE; including circumcision and glans resurfacing), partial or total glansectomy, laser therapy, or OSS combined with laser ablation (i.e., laser combination). Clinical and pathologic data were collected for descriptive analysis. Recurrences (local and regional) were identified, and the association between overall and local recurrences was determined using Cox proportional hazards regression. Overall and recurrence free survival analyses were performed using Kaplan-Meier estimates. Results: A total of 129 patients undergoing OSS were identified with a median follow up interval of 28.0 months. The most common OSS was laser combination (38.8%), and 65.1% of patients presented with pTis or <= pT1a disease. Twenty (15.5%) recurrences were identified, of which 17 (13.2%) were local and 3 (2.3%) were regional. There were no distant recurrences as the initial site of recurrence. The median time to local recurrence was 20.9 months, and 88.2% were identified within 5 years of surgery. Most (76.5%) local recurrences were successfully treated with further penile preservation without a detrimental impact on overall survival. Patients with pathologic Ta or T1a disease treated with laser or laser combination surgery were more likely to present with local recurrence. Conclusion: OSS using a variety of techniques to achieve negative surgical margins provides long-term effective local control for localized penile cancer. Most local recurrences can be successfully treated with further penile preserving strategies and long follow-up is essential. Laser therapy or laser combination with OSS should be used with caution in patients with invasive penile cancer. (C) 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:302.e19 / 302.e27
页数:9
相关论文
共 26 条
  • [1] The histological extent of the local spread of carcinoma of the penis and its therapeutic implications
    Agrawal, A
    Pai, D
    Ananthakrishnan, N
    Smile, SR
    Ratnakar, C
    [J]. BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2000, 85 (03) : 299 - 301
  • [2] Penile Sparing Surgery for Penile Cancer: A Multicenter International Retrospective Cohort
    Baumgarten, Adam
    Chipollini, Juan
    Yan, Sylvia
    Ottenhof, Sarah R.
    Tang, Dominic H.
    Draeger, Desiree
    Protzel, Chris
    Zhu, Yao
    Ye, Ding-wei
    Hakenberg, Oliver W.
    Horenblas, Simon
    Watkin, Nicholas A.
    Spiess, Philippe E.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2018, 199 (05) : 1233 - 1237
  • [3] Multi-institutional long-term experience with conservative surgery for invasive penile carcinoma
    Bissada, NK
    Yakout, HH
    Fahmy, WE
    Gayed, MST
    Touijer, AK
    Greene, GF
    Hanash, KA
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2003, 169 (02) : 500 - 502
  • [4] Penile Sparing Surgery for Penile Cancer-Does it Affect Survival?
    Djajadiningrat, Rosa S.
    van Werkhoven, Erik
    Meinhardt, Wim
    van Rhijn, Bas W. G.
    Bex, Axel
    van der Poel, Henk G.
    Horenblas, Simon
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2014, 192 (01) : 120 - 125
  • [5] Long-Term Outcome of Excisional Organ Sparing Surgery for Carcinoma of the Penis
    Feldman, Adam S.
    McDougal, W. Scott
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2011, 186 (04) : 1303 - 1307
  • [6] Penile carcinoma.: Is Nd:YAG laser therapy radical enough?
    Frimberger, D
    Hungerhuber, E
    Zaak, D
    Waidelich, R
    Hofstetter, A
    Schneede, P
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2002, 168 (06) : 2418 - 2421
  • [7] Incidence trends and survival of penile squamous cell carcinoma in the Netherlands
    Graafland, Niels M.
    Verhoeven, Rob H. A.
    Coebergh, Jan-Willem W.
    Horenblas, Simon
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2011, 128 (02) : 426 - 432
  • [8] Greene SB, 2017, AJCC CANC STAGING MA, V8, P699
  • [9] Organ Sparing Surgery for Penile Cancer: A Systematic Review
    Kamel, Mohamed H.
    Bissada, Nabil
    Warford, Renee
    Farias, Judy
    Davis, Rodney
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2017, 198 (04) : 770 - 779
  • [10] Quality of Life for Patients Treated for Penile Cancer
    Kieffer, Jacobien M.
    Djajadiningrat, Rosa S.
    van Muilekom, Erik A. M.
    Graafland, Niels M.
    Horenblas, Simon
    Aaronson, Neil K.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2014, 192 (04) : 1105 - 1110