Screening for myopia and refractive errors using LogMAR visual acuity by optometrists and a simplified visual acuity chart by nurses

被引:18
作者
Tong, L
Saw, SM
Chan, ESY
Yap, M
Lee, HY
Kwang, YP
Tan, D
机构
[1] Singapore Natl Eye Ctr, Singapore 168751, Singapore
[2] Singapore Eye Res Inst, Singapore, Singapore
[3] Natl Univ Singapore, Singapore 117548, Singapore
[4] Minist Hlth Singapore, Natl Med Res Council, Clin Trials & Epidemiol Res, Singapore, Singapore
[5] Minist Hlth Singapore, Hlth Promot Board, Singapore, Singapore
关键词
epidemiology; human; clinical study; cross-sectional study; refractive errors; myopia; visual acuity;
D O I
10.1097/01.opx.0000144747.88341.b2
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Purpose. To compare the sensitivity and specificity of a widespread method of screening for refractive errors in Singapore schoolchildren using a simplified acuity screening chart with a more rigorous method using the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) chart. A secondary aim is to estimate the best cutoff values for the detection of refractive errors using these two methods. Methods. This is a population-based study, involving 1779 schoolchildren from three schools in Singapore. Logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) visual acuity was recorded using a modified Bailey-Lovie chart by trained optometrists, and visual acuity measurement was also undertaken using a simplified 7-line visual acuity screening chart by school health nurses. The main outcome measures were the receiver-operating characteristics (ROC's) of logMAR and the simplified screening visual acuity to detect myopia or any refractive errors. The difference between measurements, simplified screening visual acuity - logMAR visual acuity, was calculated. Results. The optimal threshold using the simplified screening visual acuity chart for the detection of myopia or any refractive error was 6/12 or worse. Using logMAR visual acuity, the most efficient threshold for the detection of myopia was 0.26, but this was 0.18 for the detection of any refractive error. The area under the ROC curves was significantly greater in the case of the logMAR visual acuity measurement compared with the simplified screening visual acuity measurement for the detection of myopia or any refractive errors. The 95% limits of agreement for the two methods (simplified screening - logMAR acuity) was -0.219 to +0.339. Conclusions. Bearing in mind that the visual acuity measurements were performed by two different groups of professionals, visual acuity screening using the ETDRS method appears to be more accurate than the simplified charts for the detection of myopia or any refractive errors in children.
引用
收藏
页码:684 / 691
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Changes in myopia, visual acuity, and psychological distress after biofeedback visual training
    Angi, MR
    Caucci, S
    Pilotto, E
    Racano, E
    Rupolo, G
    Sabbadin, E
    [J]. OPTOMETRY AND VISION SCIENCE, 1996, 73 (01) : 35 - 42
  • [22] A new Arabic distance visual acuity chart
    AlMufarrej, MM
    AboHiemed, FA
    Oduntan, AO
    [J]. OPTOMETRY AND VISION SCIENCE, 1996, 73 (01) : 59 - 61
  • [23] Visual Acuity Testing Using a Random Method Visual Acuity Application
    Rhiu, Soolienah
    Lee, Hye Jin
    Goo, Yong Sook
    Cho, Kyoungrok
    Kim, Jae-hyung
    [J]. TELEMEDICINE AND E-HEALTH, 2016, 22 (03) : 232 - 237
  • [24] Is the high contrast visual acuity chart a good predictor of improvement in visual acuity with low vision aids?
    Sahu, Anupam
    Agrawal, Deepshikha
    Bhatia, Priyavrat
    [J]. INDIAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2021, 69 (07) : 1872 - 1875
  • [25] Visual acuity testing in diabetic subjects: the decimal progression chart versus the Freiburg visual acuity test
    Knudsen, LL
    [J]. GRAEFES ARCHIVE FOR CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2003, 241 (08) : 615 - 618
  • [26] Visual acuity testing in diabetic subjects: the decimal progression chart versus the Freiburg visual acuity test
    Lars Loumann Knudsen
    [J]. Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology, 2003, 241 : 615 - 618
  • [27] Construction and validation of logMAR visual acuity charts in seven Indian languages
    Negiloni, Kalpa
    Mazumdar, Deepmala
    Neog, Aditya
    Das, Biman
    Medhi, Jnanankar
    Choudhury, Mitalee
    George, Ronnie Jacob
    Ramani, Krishna Kumar
    [J]. INDIAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2018, 66 (05) : 641 - 646
  • [28] Visual Acuity and Refractive Status in Congenital Macular Coloboma
    Yang, Pingxiao
    Chen, Yilin
    Li, Wentao
    Yang, Ting
    Huo, Lijun
    [J]. CURRENT EYE RESEARCH, 2025, 50 (03) : 314 - 319
  • [29] Comparison of the Snellen and Spectrum LogMAR visual acuity charts in schoolgoing children
    Metsing, Thokozile, I
    Hansraj, Rekha
    Jacobs, Wanda
    [J]. AFRICAN VISION AND EYE HEALTH JOURNAL, 2020, 79 (01):
  • [30] Visual acuity in the early course following photorefractive keratectomy for myopia
    Nguyen, NX
    Langenbucher, A
    Walter, A
    Küchle, M
    Seitz, B
    [J]. KLINISCHE MONATSBLATTER FUR AUGENHEILKUNDE, 1999, 215 (04) : 233 - 236