Screening for myopia and refractive errors using LogMAR visual acuity by optometrists and a simplified visual acuity chart by nurses

被引:18
|
作者
Tong, L
Saw, SM
Chan, ESY
Yap, M
Lee, HY
Kwang, YP
Tan, D
机构
[1] Singapore Natl Eye Ctr, Singapore 168751, Singapore
[2] Singapore Eye Res Inst, Singapore, Singapore
[3] Natl Univ Singapore, Singapore 117548, Singapore
[4] Minist Hlth Singapore, Natl Med Res Council, Clin Trials & Epidemiol Res, Singapore, Singapore
[5] Minist Hlth Singapore, Hlth Promot Board, Singapore, Singapore
关键词
epidemiology; human; clinical study; cross-sectional study; refractive errors; myopia; visual acuity;
D O I
10.1097/01.opx.0000144747.88341.b2
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Purpose. To compare the sensitivity and specificity of a widespread method of screening for refractive errors in Singapore schoolchildren using a simplified acuity screening chart with a more rigorous method using the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) chart. A secondary aim is to estimate the best cutoff values for the detection of refractive errors using these two methods. Methods. This is a population-based study, involving 1779 schoolchildren from three schools in Singapore. Logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) visual acuity was recorded using a modified Bailey-Lovie chart by trained optometrists, and visual acuity measurement was also undertaken using a simplified 7-line visual acuity screening chart by school health nurses. The main outcome measures were the receiver-operating characteristics (ROC's) of logMAR and the simplified screening visual acuity to detect myopia or any refractive errors. The difference between measurements, simplified screening visual acuity - logMAR visual acuity, was calculated. Results. The optimal threshold using the simplified screening visual acuity chart for the detection of myopia or any refractive error was 6/12 or worse. Using logMAR visual acuity, the most efficient threshold for the detection of myopia was 0.26, but this was 0.18 for the detection of any refractive error. The area under the ROC curves was significantly greater in the case of the logMAR visual acuity measurement compared with the simplified screening visual acuity measurement for the detection of myopia or any refractive errors. The 95% limits of agreement for the two methods (simplified screening - logMAR acuity) was -0.219 to +0.339. Conclusions. Bearing in mind that the visual acuity measurements were performed by two different groups of professionals, visual acuity screening using the ETDRS method appears to be more accurate than the simplified charts for the detection of myopia or any refractive errors in children.
引用
收藏
页码:684 / 691
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Sensitivity and specificity of visual acuity screening for refractive errors in school children
    Tong, L
    Saw, SM
    Tan, D
    Chia, KS
    Chan, WY
    Carkeet, A
    Chua, WH
    Hong, CY
    OPTOMETRY AND VISION SCIENCE, 2002, 79 (10) : 650 - 657
  • [2] Screening for Significant Refractive Error Using a Combination of Distance Visual Acuity and Near Visual Acuity
    Jin, Peiyao
    Zhu, Jianfeng
    Zou, Haidong
    Lu, Lina
    Zhao, Huijuan
    Li, Qiangqiang
    He, Xiangui
    PLOS ONE, 2015, 10 (02):
  • [3] A new Gujarati language logMAR visual acuity chart: Development and validation
    Sailoganathan, Ananth
    Siderov, John
    Osuobeni, Ebi
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2013, 61 (10) : 557 - 561
  • [4] SPHEROCYLINDRICAL REFRACTIVE ERRORS AND VISUAL-ACUITY
    RAASCH, TW
    OPTOMETRY AND VISION SCIENCE, 1995, 72 (04) : 272 - 275
  • [5] Myopia Screening: Combining Visual Acuity and Noncycloplegic Autorefraction
    Ma, Yingyan
    He, Xiangui
    Zou, Haidong
    Lu, Lina
    Qu, Xiaomei
    Zhu, Jianfeng
    OPTOMETRY AND VISION SCIENCE, 2013, 90 (12) : 1479 - 1485
  • [6] Estimating visual acuity by character counting using the Snellen visual acuity chart
    Levy, AH
    McCulley, TJ
    Lam, BL
    Feuer, WJ
    EYE, 2005, 19 (06) : 622 - 624
  • [7] Estimating visual acuity by character counting using the Snellen visual acuity chart
    A H Levy
    T J McCulley
    B L Lam
    W J Feuer
    Eye, 2005, 19 : 622 - 624
  • [8] Calculating the mean visual acuity and the change in visual acuity with a decimal acuity chart
    Touzeau, O
    JOURNAL FRANCAIS D OPHTALMOLOGIE, 2003, 26 (06): : 586 - 590
  • [9] Treatment of myopia through operant training in visual acuity: changes in visual discrimination and refractive error
    Gismera-Neuberger, S
    Santacreu, J
    PSICOLOGIA CONDUCTUAL, 1997, 5 (03): : 409 - 432
  • [10] Measuring the impact of suppression on visual acuity in children with amblyopia using a dichoptic visual acuity chart
    Zhu, Bixia
    Liao, Meng
    Liu, Longqian
    FRONTIERS IN NEUROSCIENCE, 2022, 16