Financial Impact of a Dedicated Orthopaedic Traumatologist on a Private Group Practice

被引:15
作者
Althausen, Peter L. [1 ]
Davis, Lisa [1 ]
Boyden, Eric [1 ]
O'Mara, Timothy J. [1 ]
Uppal, Renny [1 ]
Bray, Timothy J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Reno Orthopaed Clin, Reno, NV 89503 USA
关键词
orthopaedic trauma; economic analysis; group practice; TRAUMA SYSTEM;
D O I
10.1097/BOT.0b013e3181dfc9eb
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: The purpose of the study was to demonstrate the financial impact of the addition of a dedicated orthopaedic traumatologist to a private group practice at a Level II community-based trauma system. Design: Retrospective review of financial records. Setting: Level II trauma center and large group practice. Methods: Office billing and financial data were evaluated for the 12 months before the addition of a dedicated, hospital-based, orthopaedic traumatologist and for a 2-year period after the hiring. Outcomes such as payor mix, collection rates, time to breakeven, days off, call days, evenings worked, durable medical equipment, and x-ray and casting reimbursement were analyzed. Results: The addition of a dedicated traumatologist was financially beneficial for the partnership. Existing practices increased 23% in charges and 32% in collections despite partners taking more vacation days and 14% less call. This was partially the result of increased nontrauma referrals, full clinic templates, and uninterrupted elective operating room schedules. Over a 2-year period, elective arthroplasty cases increased 13.1%, elective arthroscopy cases increased 35.4%, and total patient office visits increased 18.8%. The payor mix for trauma patients was poorer than the group average; however, this was offset by decreased overhead requirements. Collections rate for the trauma partner in evaluation and management, surgery, casting, durable medical equipment, and radiology improved dramatically after the first year to become just slightly less than other clinic-specialized practices. The cost of bringing on a new trauma partner is substantial but regained after 6 months. Conclusions: A dedicated orthopaedic traumatologist can be extremely beneficial to a group practice and to the traumatologist given the appropriate case volume, payor mix, and a relative value unit-based payment system.
引用
收藏
页码:350 / 354
页数:5
相关论文
共 5 条
[1]   Economic Viability of a Community-Based Level-II Orthopedic Trauma System [J].
Althausen, Peter L. ;
Coll, Daniel ;
Cvitash, Michael ;
Herak, Al ;
O'Mara, Timothy J. ;
Bray, Timothy J. .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2009, 91A (01) :227-235
[2]   Growth and development of the northern Nevada orthopaedic trauma system from 1994 to 2008: An update [J].
Bray, Timothy J. ;
Althausen, Peter L. ;
O'Mara, Timothy J. .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2008, 90A (04) :909-914
[3]   Design of the northern Nevada orthopaedic trauma panel: A model, level-II community-hospital system [J].
Bray, TJ .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2001, 83A (02) :283-289
[4]   Orthopaedic traumatology: The hospital side of the ledger, defining the financial relationship between physicians and hospitals [J].
Vallier, Heather A. ;
Patterson, Brendan M. ;
Meehan, Cynthia J. ;
Lombardo, Thomas .
JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC TRAUMA, 2008, 22 (04) :221-226
[5]   Economic value of orthopaedic trauma: The (second to) bottom line [J].
Ziran, Bruce H. ;
Barrette-Grischow, Mary Kate ;
Marucci, Kate .
JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC TRAUMA, 2008, 22 (04) :227-233