Advances in the assessment and prediction of interpersonal violence

被引:0
|
作者
Mills, JF [1 ]
机构
[1] Carleton Univ, Ottawa, ON, Canada
关键词
violence; risk assessment; dynamic actuarial;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
DF [法律]; D9 [法律];
学科分类号
0301 ;
摘要
This article underscores the weakness of clinical judgment as a mechanism for prediction with examples from other areas in the psychological literature. Clinical judgment has as its Achilles' heel the reliance on a person to incorporate multiple pieces of information while overcoming human judgment errors-a feat insurmountable thus far The actuarial approach to risk assessment has overcome many of the weaknesses of clinical judgment and has been shown to be a much superior method. Nonetheless, the static/historical nature of the risk factors associated with most actuarial approaches is limiting. Advances in risk prediction will be found in part in the development of dynamic actuarial instruments that will measure both static/historical and changeable risk factors. The dynamic risk factors can be reevaluated on an ongoing basis, and it is proposed that the level of change in dynamic factors necessary to represent a significant change in overall risk will be an interactive function with static risk factors.
引用
收藏
页码:236 / 241
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] The Sandby Borg Massacre: Interpersonal Violence and the Demography of the Dead
    Alfsdotter, Clara
    Kjellstrom, Anna
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ARCHAEOLOGY, 2019, 22 (02) : 210 - 231
  • [32] Interpersonal violence in Mexican young people and prevention opportunities
    Valdez-Santiago, Rosario
    Hidalgo-Solorzano, Elisa
    Mojarro-Iniguez, Mariana
    Rivera-Rivera, Leonor
    Ramos-Lira, Luciana
    SALUD PUBLICA DE MEXICO, 2013, 55 : S259 - S266
  • [33] Interpersonal violence and mental health outcomes following disaster
    Molyneaux, Robyn
    Gibbs, Lisa
    Bryant, Richard A.
    Humphreys, Cathy
    Hegarty, Kelsey
    Kellett, Connie
    Gallagher, H. Colin
    Block, Karen
    Harms, Louise
    Richardson, John F.
    Alkemade, Nathan
    Forbes, David
    BJPSYCH OPEN, 2020, 6 (01):
  • [34] INTERPERSONAL CONFLICT AND PHYSICAL VIOLENCE DURING THE CHILDBEARING YEAR
    GIELEN, AC
    OCAMPO, PJ
    FADEN, RR
    KASS, NE
    XUE, X
    SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 1994, 39 (06) : 781 - 787
  • [35] Interpersonal Violence and Health in Female University Students in Spain
    Martin-Baena, David
    Talavera, Marta
    Montero-Pinar, Isabel
    JOURNAL OF NURSING SCHOLARSHIP, 2016, 48 (06) : 561 - 568
  • [36] Interpersonal Gun Violence Research in the Social Work Literature
    Aspholm, Roberto R.
    St Vil, Christopher
    Carter, Kimberly A. E.
    HEALTH & SOCIAL WORK, 2019, 44 (04) : 224 - 231
  • [37] Prediction of inpatient violence
    Steinert, T
    ACTA PSYCHIATRICA SCANDINAVICA, 2002, 106 : 133 - 141
  • [38] Prediction of violence: Part contagious disease, part unpredictable individual: Is a public health assessment approach an additional option and at what cost?
    Hall, Ryan C. W.
    Iannuzzi, Gregory
    BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES & THE LAW, 2023, 41 (05) : 246 - 261
  • [39] Are violence risk assessment tools clinically useful?
    Carroll, Andrew
    AUSTRALIAN AND NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2007, 41 (04) : 301 - 307
  • [40] Investigation of bias in the automated assessment of school violence
    Kanbar, Lara J.
    Mishra, Anagh
    Osborn, Alexander
    Cifuentes, Andrew
    Combs, Jennifer
    Sorter, Michael
    Barzman, Drew
    Dexheimer, Judith W.
    JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL INFORMATICS, 2024, 157