The power and limitations of proportional cutbacks in common-pool resources

被引:13
作者
Gardner, R [1 ]
Herr, A
Ostrom, E
Walker, JA
机构
[1] Indiana Univ, Dept Econ, Bloomington, IN 47405 USA
[2] Indiana Univ, Dept W European Studies, Bloomington, IN 47405 USA
[3] Indiana Univ, Workshop Polit Theory & Policy Anal, Bloomington, IN 47405 USA
[4] St Vincent Coll, Dept Econ, Latrobe, PA 15650 USA
关键词
proportional cutbacks; Nash equilibrium; Kyoto protocol; common-pool resources;
D O I
10.1016/S0304-3878(00)00095-X
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This paper examines the success and limitations of proportional cutbacks as an allocation rule for improving the performance of common-pool resources (CPRs). Two field cases, one success and one failure, motivate the analysis. For symmetric CPRs, we establish the existence of efficiency-enhancing proportional cutbacks. We then introduce complications that arise in the presence of asymmetries, which induce a continuum of proportional cutbacks that raise efficiency above Nash equilibrium. Calibrating a linear-quadratic CPR model to global carbon dioxide emissions, the efficiency and distributional consequences of proportional cutbacks like those embodied in the Kyoto Protocol are derived. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved. JEL classification: Q38; D62.
引用
收藏
页码:515 / 533
页数:19
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1999, COMPREHENSIVE BIBLIO
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1993, SMALLHOLDERS HOUSEHO, DOI DOI 10.1515/9781503622067
[3]  
Baland JM, 1998, OXFORD ECON PAP, V50, P1
[4]   Wealth inequality and efficiency in the commons .1. The unregulated case [J].
Baland, JM ;
Platteau, JP .
OXFORD ECONOMIC PAPERS-NEW SERIES, 1997, 49 (04) :451-482
[5]  
BERKES F, COMMON PROPERTY RESO
[6]  
Blomquist WilliamA., 1992, Dividing the waters: Governing groundwater in southern California
[7]  
BROMLEY DW, MAKING COMMONS WORK
[8]   POLITICAL-ECONOMY OF THE GLOBAL ENVIRONMENT [J].
CHOUCRI, N .
INTERNATIONAL POLITICAL SCIENCE REVIEW, 1993, 14 (01) :103-116
[9]  
DASGUPTA P, 1992, EC TRANSNATIONAL COM
[10]  
DAYTONJOHNSON J, 1998, INEQUALITY CONSERVAT