Quality of Life After Open Radical Prostatectomy Compared with Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy

被引:39
作者
Wallerstedt, Anna [1 ]
Nyberg, Tommy [1 ,2 ]
Carlsson, Stefan [1 ]
Thorsteinsdottir, Thordis [3 ]
Stranne, Johan [4 ]
Tyritzis, Stavros I. [1 ]
Kollberg, Karin Stinesen [5 ]
Hugosson, Jonas [6 ]
Bjartell, Anders [7 ]
Wilderang, Ulrica [8 ]
Wiklund, Peter [1 ]
Steineck, Gunnar [8 ,9 ]
Haglind, Eva [10 ]
机构
[1] Karolinska Inst, Dept Mol Med & Surg, Sect Urol, Solnavagen 1, S-17177 Solna, Sweden
[2] Univ Cambridge, Ctr Canc Genet Epidemiol, Dept Publ Hlth & Primary Care, Cambridge, England
[3] Univ Iceland, Sch Hlth Sci, Fac Nursing, Reykjavik, Iceland
[4] Univ Gothenburg, Sahlgrenska Acad, Inst Clin Sci, Dept Urol, Gothenburg, Sweden
[5] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Jonsson Comprehens Canc Ctr, Fielding Sch Publ Hlth, UCLA Ctr Canc Prevent & Control Res CPCR, Los Angeles, CA USA
[6] Univ Gothenburg, Sahlgrenska Univ Hosp, Sahlgrenska Acad, Dept Urol,Inst Clin Sci, Gothenburg, Sweden
[7] Lund Univ, Skane Univ Hosp, Dept Urol, Lund, Sweden
[8] Univ Gothenburg, Sahlgrenska Acad, Inst Clin Sci, Div Clin Canc Epidemiol,Dept Oncol, Gothenburg, Sweden
[9] Karolinska Inst, Div Clin Canc Epidemiol, Dept Oncol & Pathol, Solna, Sweden
[10] Univ Gothenburg, Sahlgrenska Acad, Inst Clin Sci, Dept Surg, Gothenburg, Sweden
来源
EUROPEAN UROLOGY FOCUS | 2019年 / 5卷 / 03期
基金
瑞典研究理事会;
关键词
Prostate cancer; Radical prostatectomy; Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy; Quality of life; CANCER; MEN; INCONTINENCE; SATISFACTION; METAANALYSIS; CONTINENCE; BOTHER; RATES; STEP;
D O I
10.1016/j.euf.2017.12.010
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Surgery for prostate cancer has a large impact on quality of life (QoL). Objective: To evaluate predictors for the level of self-assessed QoL at 3 mo, 12 mo, and 24 mo after robot-assisted laparoscopic (RALP) and open radical prostatectomy (ORP). Design, setting, and participants: The LAParoscopic Prostatectomy Robot Open study, a prospective, controlled, nonrandomised trial of more than 4000 men who underwent radical prostatectomy at 14 centres. Here we report on QoL issues after RALP and ORP. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis: The primary outcome was self-assessed QoL preoperatively and at 3 mo, 12 mo, and 24 mo postoperatively. A direct validated question of self-assessed QoL on a seven-digit visual scale was used. Differences in QoL were analysed using logistic regression, with adjustment for confounders. Results and limitations: QoL did not differ between RALP and ORP postoperatively. Men undergoing ORP had a preoperatively significantly lower level of self-assessed QoL in a multivariable analysis compared with men undergoing RALP (odds ratio: 1.21, 95% confidence interval: 1.02-1.43), that disappeared when adjusted for preoperative preparedness for incontinence, erectile dysfunction, and certainty of being cured (odds ratio: 1.18, 95% confidence interval: 0.99-1.40). Incontinence and erectile dysfunction increased the risk for poor QoL at 3 mo, 12 mo, and 24 mo postoperatively. Biochemical recurrence did not affect QoL. A limitation of the study is the nonrandomised design. Conclusions: QoL at 3 mo, 12 mo, and 24 mo after RALP or ORP did not differ significantly between the two techniques. Poor QoL was associated with postoperative incontinence and erectile dysfunction but not with early cancer relapse, which was related to thoughts of death and waking up at night with worry. Patient summary: We did not find any difference in quality of life at 3 mo, 12 mo, and 24 mo when open and robot-assisted surgery for prostate cancer were compared. Postoperative incontinence and erectile dysfunction were associated with poor quality of life. (c) 2017 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:389 / 398
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Retrospective evaluation of the improvement in the urinary status-related quality of life after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy
    Kohada, Yuki
    Hieda, Keisuke
    Miyamoto, Shunsuke
    Tasaka, Ryo
    Asami, Akihiro
    Akiyama, Kosuke
    Sakamoto, Yuki
    Kirishima, Fumiaki
    Saito, Kohei
    Fukushima, Takafumi
    Takemoto, Kenshiro
    Babasaki, Takashi
    Kobatake, Kohei
    Kitano, Hiroyuki
    Goto, Keisuke
    Ikeda, Kenichiro
    Hayashi, Tetsutaro
    Hinata, Nobuyuki
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2023, 30 (11) : 1020 - 1027
  • [22] Improvement of quality of life and symptom burden after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in patients with moderate to severe LUTS
    Leyh-Bannurah, Sami-Ramzi
    Wagner, Christian
    Schuette, Andreas
    Liakos, Nikolaos
    Karagiotis, Theodoros
    Mendrek, Mikolaj
    Rachubinski, Pawel
    Urbanova, Katarina
    Oelke, Matthias
    Witt, Jorn H.
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2021, 11 (01)
  • [23] Robot-Assisted radical Prostatectomy
    Wagner, Christian
    Addali, Mustapha
    Witt, Joern H.
    AKTUELLE UROLOGIE, 2020, 51 (05) : 483 - 497
  • [24] Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy After Previous Prostate Surgery
    Tugcu, Volkan
    Atar, Arda
    Sahin, Selcuk
    Kargi, Taner
    Seker, Kamil Gokhan
    IlkerComez, Yusuf
    IhsanTasci, Ali
    JSLS-JOURNAL OF THE SOCIETY OF LAPAROENDOSCOPIC SURGEONS, 2015, 19 (04)
  • [25] Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy vs laparoscopic and open retropubic radical prostatectomy: functional outcomes 18 months after diagnosis from a national cohort study in England
    Nossiter, Julie
    Sujenthiran, Arunan
    Charman, Susan C.
    Cathcart, Paul J.
    Aggarwal, Ajay
    Payne, Heather
    Clarke, Noel W.
    van der Meulen, Jan
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2018, 118 (04) : 489 - 494
  • [26] Comparative Effectiveness of Robot-assisted Versus Open Radical Prostatectomy Cancer Control
    Hu, Jim C.
    Gandaglia, Giorgio
    Karakiewicz, Pierre I.
    Nguyen, Paul L.
    Trinh, Quoc-Dien
    Shih, Ya-Chen Tina
    Abdollah, Firas
    Chamie, Karim
    Wright, Jonathan L.
    Ganz, Patricia A.
    Sun, Maxine
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2014, 66 (04) : 666 - 672
  • [27] EVOLUTION OF ROBOT-ASSISTED RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY
    Orvieto, M. A.
    Patel, V. R.
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2009, 98 (02) : 76 - 88
  • [28] Can Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy Improve Functional Outcomes Compared to Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy? Experience at a Laparoscopic Center
    Lu, Cheng-Hsin
    Wu, Chun-Hsien
    Chen, Yu-Chi
    Chen, Chung-Hsien
    Wu, Richard Chen-Yu
    Lee, Yeh-Hsi
    Huang, Ching-Yu
    Yu, Tsan-Jung
    Lin, Victor C.
    UROLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2019, 30 (03) : 124 - 130
  • [29] Oncologic and quality-of-life outcomes with wide resection in robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy
    Yang, David Y.
    Monn, M. Francesca
    Kaimakliotis, Hristos Z.
    Cary, K. Clint
    Cheng, Liang
    Koch, Michael O.
    UROLOGIC ONCOLOGY-SEMINARS AND ORIGINAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2015, 33 (02) : 70.e9 - 70.e14
  • [30] Outcomes after robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy
    Murphy, Declan G.
    Challacombe, Benjamin J.
    Costello, Anthony J.
    ASIAN JOURNAL OF ANDROLOGY, 2009, 11 (01) : 94 - 99