Electric vehicle charging station accessibility and land use clustering: A case study of the Chicago region

被引:23
作者
Carlton, Gregory J. [1 ]
Sultana, Selima [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ North Carolina Greensboro, Dept Geog Environm Sustainabil, 237 Graham Bldg 1009 Spring Garden St, Greensboro, NC 27412 USA
来源
JOURNAL OF URBAN MOBILITY | 2022年 / 2卷
关键词
Charging stations; Mobility justice; Land use; Geographic accessibility; Spatial clustering; Splintered urbanism; ACCESS; DISPARITIES; ADOPTION; INFRASTRUCTURE; COMMUNITIES; JUSTICE;
D O I
10.1016/j.urbmob.2022.100019
中图分类号
P9 [自然地理学]; K9 [地理];
学科分类号
0705 ; 070501 ;
摘要
Land use mixing, balanced land uses, and transportation accessibility have previously been indicated as significant impactors of travel behavior, yet this relationship has not been examined in the EVSE accessibility literature. Using an application of the unsupervised machine learning (ML) clustering algorithm Density-based spatial clustering of applications with noise (DBSCAN), this research identifies 34 areas of spatially clustered level-1, level-2, and DC Fast EVSE charging infrastructure in the Chicago Metropolitan Area. Results indicate that charging access is imbalanced across suburban and urban communities and much of this disparity can be tied to EVSE clustering and its associated land use regimes in the metropolitan area. The majority of EVSE clusters are comprised primarily of level-2 charging and exist in isolated commercial developments to the affluent north and west of the city. Only 26% of clusters are associated with mixed land uses that occur in higher-income dense neighborhoods such as Evanston. Level-3 charging forms a smaller proportion of clustered charging across the region but is primarily unclustered. From a travel behavior perspective, this research highlights a need for a wider abundance of public fast charging options for lower socioeconomic communities and not merely utilitarian charging allocations that perpetuate accessibility for the wealthy.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 75 条
[1]   Why is electric vehicle uptake low in Atlantic Canada? A comparison to leading adoption provinces [J].
Abotalebi, Elnaz ;
Scott, Darren M. ;
Ferguson, Mark R. .
JOURNAL OF TRANSPORT GEOGRAPHY, 2019, 74 :289-298
[2]   Electric vehicle park-charge-ride programs: A planning framework and case study in Chicago [J].
Ai, Ning ;
Zheng, Junjun ;
Chen, Xiaochen .
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART D-TRANSPORT AND ENVIRONMENT, 2018, 59 :433-450
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2014, NREL/TP-5400-61777.
[4]   How might potential future plug-in electric vehicle buyers differ from current "Pioneer" owners? [J].
Axsen, Jonn ;
Goldberg, Suzanne ;
Bailey, Joseph .
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART D-TRANSPORT AND ENVIRONMENT, 2016, 47 :357-370
[5]  
Bauer G., 2021, WHITE PAPER
[6]  
Bernardo Valeria., 2013, Fast charging stations: Network planning versus free entry
[7]  
Brown A, 2020, EVOLUTION PLUG IN EL
[8]  
Brown Abby, 2021, NREL/TP-5400-79536.
[9]   The effect of electric vehicles on urban noise maps [J].
Campello-Vicente, Hector ;
Peral-Orts, Ramon ;
Campillo-Davo, Nuria ;
Velasco-Sanchez, Emilio .
APPLIED ACOUSTICS, 2017, 116 :59-64
[10]   An early look at plug-in electric vehicle adoption in disadvantaged communities in California [J].
Canepa, Kathryn ;
Hardman, Scott ;
Tal, Gil .
TRANSPORT POLICY, 2019, 78 :19-30