Stochastic consequential Life Cycle Assessment of technology substitution in the case of a novel PET chemical recycling technology

被引:18
作者
Cornago, Simone [1 ,2 ]
Rovelli, Davide [3 ]
Brondi, Carlo [3 ]
Crippa, Maurizio [4 ]
Morico, Barbara [5 ]
Ballarino, Andrea [3 ]
Dotelli, Giovanni [6 ]
机构
[1] Singapore Inst Mfg Technol, 2 Fusionopolis Way, Singapore 138634, Singapore
[2] Natl Univ Singapore, 21 Lower Kent Ridge Rd, Singapore 119077, Singapore
[3] CNR, STIIMA, Inst Intelligent Ind Technol & Syst Adv Mfg, Via Alfonso Corti 12, I-20133 Milan, Italy
[4] Gr3n SA, Via Probello 19, CH-6963 Lugano, Switzerland
[5] NextChem, Via Polidoro 1, I-67100 Laquila, Italy
[6] Politecn Milan, Dipartimento Chim Mat & Ingn Chim G Natta, Piazza Leonardo,Vinci 32, I-20133 Milan, Italy
基金
欧盟地平线“2020”;
关键词
Consequential life cycle assessment; Plastic; Paired simulation; Stochastic simulation; Scenario analysis; Sensitivity analysis; LCA;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127406
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The current traditional mechanical recycling of Polyethylene Terephthalate (PET) grinds the waste into granulate, yet the resulting secondary material quality is strongly dependent on the efficiency of the selection processes, leading to the requirement of an integration of fossil PET to assure the bottle-grade quality is reached. Instead, the novel chemical recycling gr3n technology depolymerizes the waste PET back into the constituent monomers with a resulting quality that is comparable to the virgin product, due to a more efficient separation of impurities. In order to estimate the environmental impacts related to the introduction of this technology in the related market, Consequential Life Cycle Assessment (CLCA) is particularly indicated. Among the consequential approaches, we adopt the Stochastic Technology Choice Model, as it is able to model the technological mixes typical of markets based on costs and production capacities, while its stochasticity suits the need to manage the uncertainty of future market conditions. Indeed, the assessment of the expected technological mixes contributing to the same function and the quality of the recycled material are key to evaluate the variation in marginal LCA impacts due to the introduction of the gr3n technology. We assess the marginal LCA impacts of the European bottle-grade PET market in two scenarios: one in which the gr3n technology is not available and one in which this technology is present. To correctly evaluate the difference between these two scenarios, we perform a paired simulation. Here we show that the populations related to this difference show more than 50% negative results in 12 out of 16 impact indicators and more than 75% of negative results in 9 out of 16 impact indicators. In particular, a median 0.13 kg CO2-eq per kg bottle-grade PET could be saved by the introduction of gr3n, equivalent to a 5% reduction. We show that the 5-95 percentiles range of the difference between the two scenarios is only 17.7% of the average range defined by the two separate scenarios distributions, confirming previous findings from the literature. The robustness of the results is tested through three sensitivity analyses. Therefore, policy makers should focus on limiting the increase in marginal demand of PET and on creating fair conditions for this chemical recycling technology to be deployed to complement mechanical recycling in reducing virgin PET production, thus decreasing potential environmental impacts and fostering a more circular economy. The positive performance of the novel technology is strongly related to the increased substitution of waste treatment processes, such as incineration and landfill, and to the increased quality of the recycled product: this environmental profile could further improve as the novel technology will scale up industrially.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 41 条
[1]   Glass vs. Plastic: Life Cycle Assessment of Extra-Virgin Olive Oil Bottles across Global Supply Chains [J].
Accorsi, Riccardo ;
Versari, Lorenzo ;
Manzini, Riccardo .
SUSTAINABILITY, 2015, 7 (03) :2818-2840
[2]   Recycling of PET [J].
Awaja, F ;
Pavel, D .
EUROPEAN POLYMER JOURNAL, 2005, 41 (07) :1453-1477
[3]   Consequential lifecycle modelling of solid waste management systems - Reviewing choices and exploring their consequences [J].
Bernstad Saraiva, A. ;
Souza, R. G. ;
Mahler, C. F. ;
Valle, R. A. B. .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2018, 202 :488-496
[4]   Independent information modules-a powerful approach for life cycle management [J].
Buxmann K. ;
Kistler P. ;
Rebitzer G. .
International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2009, 14 (SUPPL. 1) :S92-S100
[5]   Comparative life cycle assessment of fossil and bio-based polyethylene terephthalate (PET) bottles [J].
Chen, Luyi ;
Pelton, Rylie E. O. ;
Smith, Timothy M. .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2016, 137 :667-676
[6]   A life cycle assessment of the closed-loop recycling and thermal recovery of post-consumer PET [J].
Chilton, Tom ;
Burnley, Stephen ;
Nesaratnam, Suresh .
RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING, 2010, 54 (12) :1241-1249
[7]  
Crippa M., 2019, Studies in surface science and catalysts . s.l.:s.n, P215, DOI DOI 10.1016/B978-0-444-64337-7.00012-4
[8]   Ex-ante LCA of emerging technologies [J].
Cucurachi, Stefano ;
van der Giesena, Coen ;
Guinee, Jeroen .
25TH CIRP LIFE CYCLE ENGINEERING (LCE) CONFERENCE, 2018, 69 :463-468
[9]   Developments in the life cycle assessment of chemical recycling of plastic waste e A review [J].
Davidson, Matthew G. ;
Furlong, Rebecca A. ;
McManus, Marcelle C. .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2021, 293
[10]  
Delft C.E., 2019, CO2 BALANSEN GROENGA