Mutations of ousA alter the virulence of Erwinia chrysanthemi

被引:12
作者
Gloux, K
Touze, T
Pagot, Y
Jouan, B
Blanco, C
机构
[1] INRA, UMR Rech Organismes & Populat Appl Protect Plante, F-35653 Le Rheu, France
[2] Univ Rennes 1, CNRS, UMR 6026, F-35042 Rennes, France
[3] INRA 1238, CNRS 2585, INA PG, UMR, F-78850 Thiverval Grignon, France
关键词
D O I
10.1094/MPMI-18-0150
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
A negative correlation was observed between the aggressiveness of several Erwinia chrysanthemi strains on potato tuber and their osmotic tolerance. The disruption of the ousA gene encoding the major osmoprotectant uptake system highly enhanced bacterial virulence on potato tubers. The ousA disruption also increased the maceration efficiency on potato tubers under anaerobic conditions. In the absence of oxygen, pectate lyase (Pel) production was significantly higher in the tissue macerated with the ousA(-) strain than with the wild type. Oxygen content is significantly different between infected and healthy tissues; therefore, ousA may be a contributory factor in the infection progression within the host. In minimal medium, ousA disruption enhanced Pel production and pelE expression only under micro-aerobiosis conditions. The effect on Pel was reversed by reintroduction of the ousA gene. The osmoprotectectants glycine betaine, proline betaine, and pipecolic acid are known to be taken up via OusA and to have an inhibitory effect on Pel production. However, their effects on Pel activity were not (glycine betaine) or only weakly (proline and pipecolic acid) affected by ousA disruption. Furthermore, no correlation was observed between their effects on Pel activities and their osmoprotection efficacies. The results demonstrate a relationship between E. chrysanthemi pathogenicity factors and the activity of ousA under low oxygen status. The evidence indicates that ousA and osmoprotectant effects on Pel are not linked to osmoregulation and that complex regulations exist between Pel production, ousA, and osmoprotection via compounds liberated during the plant infection.
引用
收藏
页码:150 / 157
页数:8
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]   Factors affecting potato soft-rot resistance to pectolytic Erwinia species in a tuber-slice assay [J].
Allefs, JJHM ;
vanDooijeweert, W ;
deJong, ER ;
Prummel, W ;
Hoogendoorn, J .
JOURNAL OF PHYTOPATHOLOGY-PHYTOPATHOLOGISCHE ZEITSCHRIFT, 1995, 143 (11-12) :705-711
[2]   Repression of formate dehydrogenase in Solanum tuberosum increases steady-state levels of formate and accelerates the accumulation of proline in response to osmotic stress [J].
Ambard-Bretteville, F ;
Sorin, C ;
Rébeillé, F ;
Hourton-Cabassa, C ;
des Francs-Small, CC .
PLANT MOLECULAR BIOLOGY, 2003, 52 (06) :1153-1168
[3]  
BARDONNET N, 1992, FEMS MICROBIOL LETT, V93, P243, DOI 10.1016/0378-1097(92)90469-5
[4]   Impact of the high-affinity proline permease gene (putP) on the virulence of Staphylococcus aureus in experimental endocarditis [J].
Bayer, AS ;
Coulter, SN ;
Stover, CK ;
Schwan, WR .
INFECTION AND IMMUNITY, 1999, 67 (02) :740-744
[5]   THE ISOLATION AND CHARACTERIZATION OF THE ESCHERICHIA-COLI DNA ADENINE METHYLASE (DAM) GENE [J].
BROOKS, JE ;
BLUMENTHAL, RM ;
GINGERAS, TR .
NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH, 1983, 11 (03) :837-851
[6]   Betaines and urinary tract infections [J].
Chambers, ST ;
Lever, M .
NEPHRON, 1996, 74 (01) :1-10
[7]   THE ROLE OF PECTIC ENZYMES IN PLANT PATHOGENESIS [J].
COLLMER, A ;
KEEN, NT .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF PHYTOPATHOLOGY, 1986, 24 :383-409
[8]   PROKARYOTIC OSMOREGULATION - GENETICS AND PHYSIOLOGY [J].
CSONKA, LN ;
HANSON, AD .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF MICROBIOLOGY, 1991, 45 :569-606
[9]   The osmotic stress response and virulence in pyelonephritis isolates of Escherichia coli:: contributions of RpoS, Prop, ProU and other systems [J].
Culham, DE ;
Lu, A ;
Jishage, M ;
Krogfelt, KA ;
Ishihama, A ;
Wood, JM .
MICROBIOLOGY-SGM, 2001, 147 :1657-1670
[10]   THE ENZYMIC DEGRADATION OF PECTIN AND OTHER POLYSACCHARIDES .2. APPLICATION OF THE CUP-PLATE ASSAY TO THE ESTIMATION OF ENZYMES [J].
DINGLE, J ;
REID, WW ;
SOLOMONS, GL .
JOURNAL OF THE SCIENCE OF FOOD AND AGRICULTURE, 1953, 4 (03) :149-155