Intensity-modulated pelvic radiation therapy and simultaneous integrated boost to the prostate area in patients with high-risk prostate cancer: a preliminary report of disease control

被引:10
作者
Saracino, Biancamaria [1 ]
Petrongari, Maria Grazia [1 ]
Marzi, Simona [2 ]
Bruzzaniti, Vicente [2 ]
Sara, Gomellini [1 ]
Arcangeli, Stefano [1 ]
Arcangeli, Giorgio [1 ]
Pinnaro, Paola [1 ]
Giordano, Carolina [1 ]
Ferraro, Anna Maria [1 ]
Strigari, Lidia [2 ]
机构
[1] Regina Elena Inst Canc Res, Dept Radiotherapy, I-00144 Rome, Italy
[2] Regina Elena Inst Canc Res, Med Phys Lab, I-00144 Rome, Italy
来源
CANCER MEDICINE | 2014年 / 3卷 / 05期
关键词
Disease control; IMRT; late toxicity; whole pelvic radiotherapy; LYMPH-NODE METASTASES; ANDROGEN SUPPRESSION; DOSE-ESCALATION; RADIOTHERAPY; IRRADIATION; TRIAL; LYMPHADENECTOMY; NEOADJUVANT; TOXICITY; MEN;
D O I
10.1002/cam4.278
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
The aim of the study was to report the clinical results in patients with high-risk prostate cancer treated with pelvic intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) to the prostate area. A total of 110 patients entered our study, 37 patients presented with localized prostate cancer and radiological evidence of node metastases or >= 15% estimated risk of lymph node (LN) involvement, while 73 patients underwent postoperative adjuvant or salvage irradiation for biochemical or residual/recurrent disease, LN metastases, or high risk of harboring nodal metastases. All patients received androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) for 2 years. The median follow-up was 56.5 months. For the whole patient group, the 3- and 5-year freedom from biochemical failure were 82.6% and 74.6%, respectively, with a better outcome in patients treated with radical approach. The 3- and 5-year freedom from local failure were 94.4% and 90.2%, respectively, while the 3- and 5-year distant metastasis-free survival were 87.8% and 81.7%, respectively. For all study patients, the rate of freedom from G2 acute rectal, intestinal, and urinary toxicities was 60%, 77%, and 61%, respectively. There was no G3 acute toxicity, >= G2 late intestinal toxicity, or G3 late urinary or rectal toxicity. The 3- and 5-year >= G2 freedom from late rectal toxicity rate were 98% and 95%, respectively, while the 3- and 5-year >= G2 freedom from late urinary toxicity rate were 95% and 88%, respectively. The study concludes that pelvic IMRT and SIB to the prostatic area in association with 2-year ADT was a well-tolerated technique, providing high disease control in patients with prostate cancer requiring LN treatment.
引用
收藏
页码:1313 / 1321
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Biochemical Control and Toxicity after Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy for Prostate Cancer
    Liauw, Stanley L.
    Weichselbaum, Ralph R.
    Rash, Carla
    Correa, David
    Al-Hallaq, Hania A.
    Pelizzari, Charles A.
    Jani, Ashesh B.
    TECHNOLOGY IN CANCER RESEARCH & TREATMENT, 2009, 8 (03) : 201 - 206
  • [42] Efficacy and toxicity of conventionally fractionated pelvic radiation with a hypofractionated simultaneous versus conventionally fractionated sequential boost for patients with high-risk prostate cancer
    McDonald, Andrew M.
    Jacob, Rojymon
    Dobelbower, Michael C.
    Kim, Robert Y.
    Fiveash, John B.
    ACTA ONCOLOGICA, 2013, 52 (06) : 1181 - 1188
  • [43] A Dosimetric Comparison of Tomotherapy and Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy in the Treatment of High-Risk Prostate Cancer With Pelvic Nodal Radiation Therapy
    Pasquier, David
    Cavillon, Fabrice
    Lacornerie, Thomas
    Touzeau, Claire
    Tresch, Emmanuelle
    Lartigau, Eric
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2013, 85 (02): : 549 - 554
  • [44] SIMULTANEOUS INTEGRATED BOOST INTENSITY-MODULATED RADIOTHERAPY IN PATIENTS WITH HIGH-GRADE GLIOMAS
    Cho, Kwan Ho
    Kim, Joo-Young
    Lee, Seung Hoon
    Yoo, Heon
    Shin, Sang Hoon
    Moon, Sung Ho
    Kim, Tae Hyun
    Shin, Kyung Hwan
    Yoon, Myonggeun
    Lee, Doo-Hyun
    Pyo, Hong Ryull
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2010, 78 (02): : 390 - 397
  • [45] Ten-Year Results From a Phase II Study on Image Guided, Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy With Simultaneous Integrated Boost in High-Risk Prostate Cancer
    Ekanger, Christian
    Helle, Svein Inge
    Heinrich, Daniel
    Johannessen, Dag Clement
    Karlsdottir, Asa
    Nygard, Yngve
    Halvorsen, Ole Johan
    Reisaeter, Lars
    Kvale, Rune
    Hysing, Liv Bolstad
    Dahl, Olav
    ADVANCES IN RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2020, 5 (03) : 396 - 403
  • [46] Helical intensity-modulated radiotherapy of the pelvic lymph nodes with a simultaneous integrated boost to the prostate - first results of the PLATIN 1 trial
    Gregor Habl
    Sonja Katayama
    Matthias Uhl
    Kerstin A. Kessel
    Lutz Edler
    Juergen Debus
    Klaus Herfarth
    Florian Sterzing
    BMC Cancer, 15
  • [47] Monte Carlo dose verification of prostate patients treated with simultaneous integrated boost intensity modulated radiation therapy
    Dogan, Nesrin
    Mihaylov, Ivaylo
    Wu, Yan
    Keall, Paul J.
    Siebers, Jeffrey V.
    Hagan, Michael P.
    RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2009, 4
  • [48] Reimbursement and use of intensity-modulated radiation therapy for prostate cancer
    Shahinian, Vahakn B.
    Kaufman, Samuel R.
    Yan, Phyllis
    Herrel, Lindsey A.
    Borza, Tudor
    Hollenbeck, Brent K.
    MEDICINE, 2017, 96 (25)
  • [49] Is Proton-beam Therapy Better Than Intensity-modulated Radiation Therapy for Prostate Cancer?
    Kagan, Arthur R.
    Yeh, Jekwon
    Schulz, Robert J.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY-CANCER CLINICAL TRIALS, 2014, 37 (06): : 525 - 527
  • [50] Ten-year outcomes of whole-pelvic intensity-modulated radiation therapy for prostate cancer with regional lymph node metastasis
    Nakamura, Kiyonao
    Norihisa, Yoshiki
    Ikeda, Itaru
    Inokuchi, Haruo
    Aizawa, Rihito
    Kamoto, Toshiyuki
    Kamba, Tomomi
    Inoue, Takahiro
    Yamasaki, Toshinari
    Akamatsu, Shusuke
    Kobayashi, Takashi
    Ogawa, Osamu
    Mizowaki, Takashi
    CANCER MEDICINE, 2023, 12 (07): : 7859 - 7867