Two-stage reimplantation for periprosthetic knee infection involving resistant organisms

被引:152
作者
Mittal, Yogesh
Fehring, Thomas K.
Hanssen, Arlen
Marculescu, Camelia
Odum, Susan M.
Osmon, Douglas
机构
[1] OrthoCarolina Hip & Knee Ctr, Charlotte, NC USA
[2] Mayo Clin, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
关键词
D O I
10.2106/JBJS.E.01192
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Two-stage reimplantation is the most accepted mode of treatment for patients with a periprosthetic infection following total knee arthroplasty. Most studies, however, do not stratify their results on the basis of the type of infecting organism. The purpose of this study was to determine the outcomes for patients who had two-stage reimplantation for the treatment of infection with a resistant organism, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus or methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus epidermidis, at the site of a total knee replacement. Methods: A multicenter study was performed to review the cases of all patients treated between 1987 and 2003 because of an infection with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus or methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus epidermidis organisms at the site of a total knee replacement. The prevalence of reinfection following two-stage reimplantation was determined. Variables that may influence the outcome, such as the duration and type of intravenous antibiotics administered, previous surgery, and comorbidities of the host, were analyzed. Results: We identified thirty-seven patients who had an infection with a resistant organism. All patients had negative cultures at the time of reimplantation. Four of the thirty-seven patients had a reinfection with the same organism, while five had a reinfection with a different organism. None of the variables noted above were found to be significantly associated with reinfection, on the basis of the numbers available. Conclusions: Reports in the literature have discouraged reimplantation for the treatment of an infection with a resistant organism at the site of a total knee replacement. While 24% of the patients in this series had a reinfection, 14% had a reinfection with a different organism. We believe that two-stage reimplantation remains a viable treatment option for patients who have an infection with a resistant organism at the site of a total knee replacement. Level of Evidence: Therapeutic Level IV See Instructions to Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
引用
收藏
页码:1227 / 1231
页数:5
相关论文
共 24 条
  • [1] BLISS DG, 1985, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, P207
  • [2] Borden L S, 1987, J Arthroplasty, V2, P27, DOI 10.1016/S0883-5403(87)80028-1
  • [3] ENGLAND SP, 1990, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, P130
  • [4] Fehring TK, 2000, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, P9
  • [5] FEHRING TK, 1994, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, P229
  • [6] Preoperative serum albumin level as a predictor of operative mortality and morbidity - Results from the national VA surgical risk study
    Gibbs, J
    Cull, W
    Henderson, W
    Daley, J
    Hur, K
    Khuri, SF
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF SURGERY, 1999, 134 (01) : 36 - 42
  • [7] Greene K A, 1991, J Arthroplasty, V6, P321, DOI 10.1016/S0883-5403(06)80183-X
  • [8] The Chitranjan Ranwat Award - Mid-term to long-term Followup of two-stage reimplantation for infected total knee arthroplasty
    Haleem, AA
    Berry, DJ
    Hanssen, AD
    [J]. CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2004, (428) : 35 - 39
  • [9] Evaluation and treatment of infection at the site of a total hip of knee arthroplasty
    Hanssen, AD
    Rand, JA
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 1998, 80A (06) : 910 - 922
  • [10] Results of 2-stage reimplantation for infected total knee arthroplasty
    Hirakawa, K
    Stulberg, BN
    Wilde, AH
    Bauer, TW
    Secic, M
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 1998, 13 (01) : 22 - 28