Comparison between Thermophilic and Mesophilic Membrane-Aerated Biofilm Reactors-A Modeling Study

被引:3
作者
Lu, Duowei [1 ,2 ]
Bai, Hao [2 ]
Liao, Baoqiang [1 ]
机构
[1] Lakehead Univ, Dept Chem Engn, 955 Oliver Rd, Thunder Bay, ON P7B 5E1, Canada
[2] Lakehead Univ, Dept Mech Engn, 955 Oliver Rd, Thunder Bay, ON P7B 5E1, Canada
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
membrane-aerated biofilm reactor; thermophilic membrane-aerated biofilm reactor; thermophilic biological treatment; biofilm; mass transfer; modeling; OXYGEN MASS-TRANSFER; WASTE-WATER; COMPARATIVE PERFORMANCE; SIMULTANEOUS REMOVAL; DIFFUSION; SUBSTRATE; NITRIFICATION; BIOREACTORS; NITROGEN;
D O I
10.3390/membranes12040418
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
The concept of thermophilic membrane-aerated biofilm reactor (ThMABR) is studied by modeling. This concept combines the advantages and overcomes the disadvantages of conventional MABR and thermophilic aerobic biological treatment and has great potential to develop a new type of ultra-compact, highly efficient bioreactor for high-strength wastewater and waste gas treatments. Mathematical modeling was conducted to investigate the impact of temperature (mesophilic vs. thermophilic) and oxygen partial pressure on oxygen and substrate concentration profiles, membrane-biofilm interfacial oxygen concentration, oxygen penetration distance, and oxygen and substrate fluxes into biofilms. The general trend of oxygen transfer and substrate flux into biofilm between ThAnMBR and MMABR was verified by the experimental results in the literature. The results from modeling studies indicate that the ThMABR has significant advantages over the conventional mesophilic MABR in terms of improved oxygen and pollutant flux into biofilms and biodegradation rates, and an optimal biofilm thickness exists for maximum oxygen and substrate fluxes into the biofilm.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 56 条
  • [11] The Performance and Microbial Community Identification in Mesophilic and Atmospheric Anaerobic Membrane Bioreactor for Municipal Wastewater Treatment Associated with Different Hydraulic Retention Times
    Ding, Yi
    Liang, Zhenlin
    Guo, Zhansheng
    Li, Zhipeng
    Hou, Xuguang
    Jin, Chao
    [J]. WATER, 2019, 11 (01)
  • [12] Thermophilic membrane bioreactors: A review
    Duncan, Josh
    Bokhary, Alnour
    Fatehi, Pedram
    Kong, Fangong
    Lin, Hongjun
    Liao, Baoqiang
    [J]. BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2017, 243 : 1180 - 1193
  • [13] Essila N.J., 1997, CONTRASTING BEHAV BI
  • [14] Modeling biofilms on gas-permeable supports: Concentration and activity profiles
    Essila, NJ
    Semmens, MJ
    Voller, VR
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING-ASCE, 2000, 126 (03): : 250 - 257
  • [15] Recent progress using membrane aerated biofilm reactors for wastewater treatment
    He, Huanqi
    Wagner, Brett M.
    Carlson, Avery L.
    Yang, Cheng
    Daigger, Glen T.
    [J]. WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2021, 84 (09) : 2131 - 2157
  • [16] Surface modification of PVDF hollow fiber membrane and its application in membrane aerated biofilm reactor (MABR)
    Hou, Feifei
    Li, Baoan
    Xing, Minghao
    Wang, Qin
    Hu, Liang
    Wang, Shichang
    [J]. BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2013, 140 : 1 - 9
  • [17] Simultaneous removal of COD and nitrogen using a novel carbon-membrane aerated biofilm reactor
    Hu Shaowei
    Yang Fenglin
    Sun Cui
    Zhang Jianye
    Wang Tonghua
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES, 2008, 20 (02) : 142 - 148
  • [18] Ismail A.F., 2015, GAS SEPARATION MEMBR, V10, P973
  • [19] Kunetz T E., 2016, Proceedings of the Water Environment Federation, V201614, P2973, DOI DOI 10.2175/193864716819713006
  • [20] LaPara T.M., 1997, P 52 PURD IND WAST C