Comparison of the Berg Balance Scale and the Mini-BESTest for Assessing Balance in Ambulatory People With Spinal Cord Injury: Validation Study

被引:35
作者
Jorgensen, Vivien [1 ,2 ]
Opheim, Arve [2 ]
Halvarsson, Alexandra [1 ,3 ]
Franzen, Erika [1 ,3 ]
Roaldsen, Kirsti Skavberg [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Karolinska Inst, Div Physiotherapy, Dept Neurobiol Care Sci & Soc, Stockholm, Sweden
[2] Sunnaas Rehabil Hosp, Dept Res, N-1450 Nesoddtangen, Norway
[3] Karolinska Univ Hosp, Allied Hlth Profess Funct, Stockholm, Sweden
来源
PHYSICAL THERAPY | 2017年 / 97卷 / 06期
关键词
EVALUATION SYSTEMS TEST; VALIDITY; FALLS; INDIVIDUALS; RELIABILITY; RISK; WALKING; LIFE; MULTICENTER; STRENGTH;
D O I
10.1093/ptj/pzx030
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background. The Berg Balance Scale (BBS) has several constraints-ceiling effect, low responsiveness, and uncertain predictability of falls-in neurological populations. The -Mini-BESTest, which has not yet been validated in spinal cord injury (SCI) populations, has shown no ceiling effect, slightly better responsiveness, and could in some neurological populations predict falls. Objective. Validate and compare psychometric performances of the BBS and -Mini-BESTest in individuals with chronic SCI. Design. Cross-sectional validation study. Methods. Forty-six individuals able to walk 10 meters (85% American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale grade D) with mean age of 55 +/- 17 years and median 7 years (range: 1-41) postinjury were included. Floor/ceiling effects were inspected; internal consistency, construct validity, and receiver operating characteristics were analyzed. Results. The Mini-BESTest had no ceiling effect; 28% of participants achieved the maximum score on the BBS. Both scales showed excellent internal consistency (alpha > .93). Strong correlations between both scales (r(s) = 0.90, P < .001) and between both scales and Timed Up and Go (r(s) > .70), Spinal Cord Independence Measure-mobility items (r(s) > .80), and 10-Meter Walk Test (r(s) > .80) support high construct validity. Both scales could differentiate community walkers without walking aids from participants using aids (AUC > .86) and individuals with low/high concerns about falling (AUC > 0.79) but not recurrent (> 2 falls/year) and infrequent fallers (AUC < 0.55). The BBS and Mini-BESTest separated 2 and more than 3 different levels of balance control, respectively. Limitations. Small sample. Conclusions. Both the BBS and Mini-BESTest were found to be valid scales for assessing balance control in individuals with chronic SCI. The Mini-BESTest may be preferable for this group primarily due to the lack of a ceiling effect.
引用
收藏
页码:677 / 687
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] A new balance assessment tool for quantifying balance impairment in patients with motor incomplete spinal cord injury: Pilot study
    Park, Tae Sung
    Shin, Myung-Jun
    Shin, Yong Beom
    Kim, Sang Hun
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SPINAL CORD MEDICINE, 2023, 46 (06) : 941 - 949
  • [32] Characterization of standing balance after incomplete spinal cord injury: Alteration in integration of sensory information in ambulatory individuals
    Noamani, Alireza
    Lemay, Jean-Francois
    Musselman, Kristin E.
    Rouhani, Hossein
    [J]. GAIT & POSTURE, 2021, 83 : 152 - 159
  • [33] Functional balance assessment for predicting future recurrent falls in non-ambulatory individuals with spinal cord injury: a prospective pilot study
    Abou, Libak
    Rice, Laura A.
    [J]. PHYSIOTHERAPY THEORY AND PRACTICE, 2024, 40 (11) : 2530 - 2539
  • [34] Retrospective assessment of the validity and use of the community balance and mobility scale among individuals with subacute spinal cord injury
    Chan, K.
    Guy, K.
    Shah, G.
    Golla, J.
    Flett, H. M.
    Williams, J.
    Musselman, K. E.
    [J]. SPINAL CORD, 2017, 55 (03) : 294 - 299
  • [35] A Multivariate Examination of Temporal Changes in Berg Balance Scale Items for Patients With ASIA Impairment Scale C and D Spinal Cord Injuries
    Datta, Somnath
    Lorenz, Douglas J.
    Morrison, Sarah
    Ardolino, Elizabeth
    Harkema, Susan J.
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 2009, 90 (07): : 1208 - 1217
  • [36] The experiences of people with incomplete spinal cord injury or disease during intensive balance training and the impact of the program: A qualitative study
    Unger, Janelle
    Singh, Hardeep
    Mansfield, Avril
    Masani, Kei
    Mussleman, Kristin E.
    [J]. SPINAL CORD, 2022, 60 (12) : 1062 - 1068
  • [37] Varied movement errors drive learning of dynamic balance control during walking in people with incomplete spinal cord injury: a pilot study
    Lin, Jui-Te
    Hsu, Chao-Jung
    Dee, Weena
    Chen, David
    Rymer, W. Zev
    Wu, Ming
    [J]. EXPERIMENTAL BRAIN RESEARCH, 2020, 238 (04) : 981 - 993
  • [38] Error variability affects the after effects following motor learning of lateral balance control during walking in people with spinal cord injury
    Lin, Jui-Te
    Hsu, Chao-Jung
    Dee, Weena
    Chen, David
    Rymer, William Zev
    Wu, Ming
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE, 2019, 50 (08) : 3221 - 3234
  • [39] Role of Virtual Reality in Balance Training in Patients with Spinal Cord Injury: A Prospective Comparative Pre-Post Study
    Sengupta, Madhusree
    Gupta, Anupam
    Khanna, Meeka
    Krishnan, U. K. Rashmi
    Chakrabarti, Dhritiman
    [J]. ASIAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2020, 14 (01) : 51 - 58
  • [40] Do clinical balance measures have the ability to predict falls among ambulatory individuals with spinal cord injury? A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Abou, Libak
    Ilha, Jocemar
    Romanini, Francielle
    Rice, Laura A.
    [J]. SPINAL CORD, 2019, 57 (12) : 1001 - 1013