Comparison of the Berg Balance Scale and the Mini-BESTest for Assessing Balance in Ambulatory People With Spinal Cord Injury: Validation Study

被引:33
作者
Jorgensen, Vivien [1 ,2 ]
Opheim, Arve [2 ]
Halvarsson, Alexandra [1 ,3 ]
Franzen, Erika [1 ,3 ]
Roaldsen, Kirsti Skavberg [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Karolinska Inst, Div Physiotherapy, Dept Neurobiol Care Sci & Soc, Stockholm, Sweden
[2] Sunnaas Rehabil Hosp, Dept Res, N-1450 Nesoddtangen, Norway
[3] Karolinska Univ Hosp, Allied Hlth Profess Funct, Stockholm, Sweden
来源
PHYSICAL THERAPY | 2017年 / 97卷 / 06期
关键词
EVALUATION SYSTEMS TEST; VALIDITY; FALLS; INDIVIDUALS; RELIABILITY; RISK; WALKING; LIFE; MULTICENTER; STRENGTH;
D O I
10.1093/ptj/pzx030
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background. The Berg Balance Scale (BBS) has several constraints-ceiling effect, low responsiveness, and uncertain predictability of falls-in neurological populations. The -Mini-BESTest, which has not yet been validated in spinal cord injury (SCI) populations, has shown no ceiling effect, slightly better responsiveness, and could in some neurological populations predict falls. Objective. Validate and compare psychometric performances of the BBS and -Mini-BESTest in individuals with chronic SCI. Design. Cross-sectional validation study. Methods. Forty-six individuals able to walk 10 meters (85% American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale grade D) with mean age of 55 +/- 17 years and median 7 years (range: 1-41) postinjury were included. Floor/ceiling effects were inspected; internal consistency, construct validity, and receiver operating characteristics were analyzed. Results. The Mini-BESTest had no ceiling effect; 28% of participants achieved the maximum score on the BBS. Both scales showed excellent internal consistency (alpha > .93). Strong correlations between both scales (r(s) = 0.90, P < .001) and between both scales and Timed Up and Go (r(s) > .70), Spinal Cord Independence Measure-mobility items (r(s) > .80), and 10-Meter Walk Test (r(s) > .80) support high construct validity. Both scales could differentiate community walkers without walking aids from participants using aids (AUC > .86) and individuals with low/high concerns about falling (AUC > 0.79) but not recurrent (> 2 falls/year) and infrequent fallers (AUC < 0.55). The BBS and Mini-BESTest separated 2 and more than 3 different levels of balance control, respectively. Limitations. Small sample. Conclusions. Both the BBS and Mini-BESTest were found to be valid scales for assessing balance control in individuals with chronic SCI. The Mini-BESTest may be preferable for this group primarily due to the lack of a ceiling effect.
引用
收藏
页码:677 / 687
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Measuring balance confidence after spinal cord injury: the reliability and validity of the Activities-specific Balance Confidence Scale
    Shah, Garima
    Oates, Alison R.
    Arora, Tarun
    Lanovaz, Joel L.
    Musselman, Kristin E.
    JOURNAL OF SPINAL CORD MEDICINE, 2017, 40 (06) : 768 - 776
  • [22] Pay attention: you can fall! The Mini-BESTest scale and the turning duration of the TUG test provide valid balance measures in neurological patients: a prospective study with falls as the balance criterion
    Caronni, Antonio
    Picardi, Michela
    Scarano, Stefano
    Malloggi, Chiara
    Tropea, Peppino
    Gilardone, Giulia
    Aristidou, Evdoxia
    Pintavalle, Giuseppe
    Redaelli, Valentina
    Antoniotti, Paola
    Corbo, Massimo
    FRONTIERS IN NEUROLOGY, 2023, 14
  • [23] Comparison of the Mini-Balance Evaluations Systems Test with the Berg Balance Scale in relationship to walking speed and motor recovery post stroke
    Madhavan, Sangeetha
    Bishnoi, Alka
    TOPICS IN STROKE REHABILITATION, 2017, 24 (08) : 579 - 584
  • [24] Inspiratory Muscle Performance Is Related to Seated Balance Function in People With Spinal Cord Injury: An Observational Study
    Palermo, Anne E.
    Kirk-Sanchez, Neva J.
    Garcia, Kelsey L.
    Nash, Mark S.
    Cahalin, Lawrence P.
    ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 2022, 103 (07): : 1303 - 1310
  • [25] Balance Interventions to Improve Upright Balance Control and Balance Confidence in People With Motor-Incomplete Spinal Cord Injury or Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Benn, Natasha L.
    Jervis-Rademeyer, Hope
    Souza, Wagner H.
    Pakosh, Maureen
    Inness, Elizabeth L.
    Musselman, Kristin E.
    ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 2025, 106 (03): : 444 - 458
  • [26] Development and validation of the Standing Balance Assessment for Individuals with Spinal Cord Injury (SBASCI) -Anew outcome measure
    Singh, Meenakshi
    Sarkar, Aparna
    Kataria, Chitra
    NEUROREHABILITATION, 2020, 47 (02) : 161 - 169
  • [27] Berg Balance Scale: inter-rater and intra-rater reliability of the Spanish version with incomplete spinal cord injured subjects
    Freixes, Orestes
    Passuni, Diego Alejandro
    Buffetti, Eliana
    Elizalde, Milagros
    Lastiri, Francisco
    SPINAL CORD SERIES AND CASES, 2020, 6 (01)
  • [28] Control of center of mass motion during walking correlates with gait and balance in people with incomplete spinal cord injury
    Dusane, Shamali
    Shafer, Anna
    Ochs, Wendy L.
    Cornwell, Tara
    Henderson, Heather
    Kim, Kwang-Youn A.
    Gordon, Keith E.
    FRONTIERS IN NEUROLOGY, 2023, 14
  • [29] Positive effect of balance training with visual feedback on standing balance abilities in people with incomplete spinal cord injury
    Sayenko, D. G.
    Alekhina, M. I.
    Masani, K.
    Vette, A. H.
    Obata, H.
    Popovic, M. R.
    Nakazawa, K.
    SPINAL CORD, 2010, 48 (12) : 886 - 893
  • [30] Exoskeletal-assisted walking may improve seated balance in persons with chronic spinal cord injury: a pilot study
    Tsai, Chung-Ying
    Asselin, Pierre K.
    Hong, Eunkyoung
    Knezevic, Steven
    Kornfeld, Stephen D.
    Harel, Noam Y.
    Spungen, Ann M.
    SPINAL CORD SERIES AND CASES, 2021, 7 (01)