Comparison of the Berg Balance Scale and the Mini-BESTest for Assessing Balance in Ambulatory People With Spinal Cord Injury: Validation Study

被引:33
|
作者
Jorgensen, Vivien [1 ,2 ]
Opheim, Arve [2 ]
Halvarsson, Alexandra [1 ,3 ]
Franzen, Erika [1 ,3 ]
Roaldsen, Kirsti Skavberg [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Karolinska Inst, Div Physiotherapy, Dept Neurobiol Care Sci & Soc, Stockholm, Sweden
[2] Sunnaas Rehabil Hosp, Dept Res, N-1450 Nesoddtangen, Norway
[3] Karolinska Univ Hosp, Allied Hlth Profess Funct, Stockholm, Sweden
来源
PHYSICAL THERAPY | 2017年 / 97卷 / 06期
关键词
EVALUATION SYSTEMS TEST; VALIDITY; FALLS; INDIVIDUALS; RELIABILITY; RISK; WALKING; LIFE; MULTICENTER; STRENGTH;
D O I
10.1093/ptj/pzx030
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background. The Berg Balance Scale (BBS) has several constraints-ceiling effect, low responsiveness, and uncertain predictability of falls-in neurological populations. The -Mini-BESTest, which has not yet been validated in spinal cord injury (SCI) populations, has shown no ceiling effect, slightly better responsiveness, and could in some neurological populations predict falls. Objective. Validate and compare psychometric performances of the BBS and -Mini-BESTest in individuals with chronic SCI. Design. Cross-sectional validation study. Methods. Forty-six individuals able to walk 10 meters (85% American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale grade D) with mean age of 55 +/- 17 years and median 7 years (range: 1-41) postinjury were included. Floor/ceiling effects were inspected; internal consistency, construct validity, and receiver operating characteristics were analyzed. Results. The Mini-BESTest had no ceiling effect; 28% of participants achieved the maximum score on the BBS. Both scales showed excellent internal consistency (alpha > .93). Strong correlations between both scales (r(s) = 0.90, P < .001) and between both scales and Timed Up and Go (r(s) > .70), Spinal Cord Independence Measure-mobility items (r(s) > .80), and 10-Meter Walk Test (r(s) > .80) support high construct validity. Both scales could differentiate community walkers without walking aids from participants using aids (AUC > .86) and individuals with low/high concerns about falling (AUC > 0.79) but not recurrent (> 2 falls/year) and infrequent fallers (AUC < 0.55). The BBS and Mini-BESTest separated 2 and more than 3 different levels of balance control, respectively. Limitations. Small sample. Conclusions. Both the BBS and Mini-BESTest were found to be valid scales for assessing balance control in individuals with chronic SCI. The Mini-BESTest may be preferable for this group primarily due to the lack of a ceiling effect.
引用
收藏
页码:677 / 687
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Cohort Study Comparing the Berg Balance Scale and the Mini-BESTest in People Who Have Multiple Sclerosis and Are Ambulatory
    Ross, Elaine
    Purtill, Helen
    Uszynski, Marcin
    Hayes, Sara
    Casey, Blathin
    Browne, Catherine
    Coote, Susan
    PHYSICAL THERAPY, 2016, 96 (09): : 1448 - 1455
  • [2] Comparison of the Fullerton Advanced Balance Scale, Mini-BESTest, and Berg Balance Scale to Predict Falls in Parkinson Disease
    Schlenstedt, Christian
    Brombacher, Stephanie
    Hartwigsen, Gesa
    Weisser, Burkhard
    Moeller, Bettina
    Deuschl, Guenther
    PHYSICAL THERAPY, 2016, 96 (04): : 494 - 501
  • [3] Quantifying balance control after spinal cord injury: Reliability and validity of the mini-BESTest
    Chan, Katherine
    Unger, Janelle
    Lee, Jae Woung
    Johnston, Gillian
    Constand, Marissa
    Masani, Kei
    Musselman, Kristin E.
    JOURNAL OF SPINAL CORD MEDICINE, 2019, 42 : S141 - S148
  • [4] Comparing the Mini-BESTest with the Berg Balance Scale to Evaluate Balance Disorders in Parkinson's Disease
    King, Laurie A.
    Priest, Kelsey C.
    Salarian, Arash
    Pierce, Don
    Horak, Fay B.
    PARKINSONS DISEASE, 2012, 2012
  • [5] Comparing the Fullerton Advanced Balance Scale With the Mini-BESTest and Berg Balance Scale to Assess Postural Control in Patients With Parkinson Disease
    Schlenstedt, Christian
    Brombacher, Stephanie
    Hartwigsen, Gesa
    Weisser, Burkhard
    Moeller, Bettina
    Deuschl, Guenther
    ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 2015, 96 (02): : 218 - 225
  • [6] Reliability of the Mini-BESTest and Brief-BESTest for assessing patients with incomplete spinal cord injury
    Morooka, Yusuke
    Takakura, Yasuyuki
    Kunisawa, Yosuke
    Okubo, Yuya
    Araki, Shinta
    Obayashi, Shigeru
    SPINAL CORD, 2024, 62 (12) : 676 - 682
  • [7] Assessing balance in people with bilateral vestibulopathy using the Mini-Balance Evaluation Systems Test (Mini-BESTest): feasibility and comparison with healthy control data
    Zhu, Meichan
    van Stiphout, Lisa
    Karabulut, Mustafa
    Fornos, Angelica Perez
    Guinand, Nils
    Meijer, Kenneth
    van de Berg, Raymond
    McCrum, Christopher
    JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY, 2023, 270 (09) : 4423 - 4433
  • [8] Reliability and Validity of the Turkish Version of the Mini-BESTest Balance Scale in Patients with Stroke
    Goktas, Ayse
    Colak, Fulya Damla
    Kar, Irem
    Ekici, Gamze
    TURKISH JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY, 2020, 26 (04) : 303 - 310
  • [9] Validity, Reliability, and Ability to Identify Fall Status of the Berg Balance Scale, BESTest, Mini-BESTest, and Brief-BESTest in Patients With COPD
    Jacome, Cristina
    Cruz, Joana
    Oliveira, Ana
    Marques, Alda
    PHYSICAL THERAPY, 2016, 96 (11): : 1807 - 1815
  • [10] Enhancing the usefulness of the Mini-BESTest for measuring dynamic balance: a Rasch validation study
    Franchignoni, F.
    Godi, M.
    Guglielmetti, S.
    Nardone, A.
    Giordano, A.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL AND REHABILITATION MEDICINE, 2015, 51 (04) : 429 - 437