Machine learning models to predict electroencephalographic seizures in critically ill children

被引:7
|
作者
Hu, Jian [1 ]
Fung, France W. [3 ,4 ,5 ]
Jacobwitz, Marin [3 ]
Parikh, Darshana S. [2 ,8 ]
Vala, Lisa [8 ]
Donnelly, Maureen [8 ]
Topjian, Alexis A. [2 ,6 ]
Abend, Nicholas S. [3 ,4 ,5 ,6 ,7 ,8 ]
Xiao, Rui [1 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Univ Penn, Perelman Sch Med, Dept Biostat Epidemiol & Informat, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[2] Childrens Hosp Philadelphia, Dept Anesthesia & Crit Care Med, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[3] Childrens Hosp Philadelphia, Dept Pediat, Div Neurol, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[4] Univ Penn, Dept Neurol, Perelman Sch Med, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[5] Univ Penn, Dept Pediat, Perelman Sch Med, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[6] Univ Penn, Dept Anesthesia & Crit Care, Perelman Sch Med, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[7] Univ Penn, Ctr Clin Epidemiol & Biostat, Perelman Sch Med, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[8] Childrens Hosp Philadelphia, Dept Neurodiagnost, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
来源
SEIZURE-EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF EPILEPSY | 2021年 / 87卷
关键词
Seizure; Pediatric; Electroencephalogram; EEG monitoring; Machine learning; NONCONVULSIVE STATUS EPILEPTICUS; TRAUMATIC BRAIN-INJURY; CONTINUOUS VIDEO-EEG; ELECTROGRAPHIC SEIZURES; CONSENSUS STATEMENT; COMATOSE CHILDREN; ADULTS; COMMON; TERMINOLOGY; GUIDELINES;
D O I
10.1016/j.seizure.2021.03.001
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: To determine whether machine learning techniques would enhance our ability to incorporate key variables into a parsimonious model with optimized prediction performance for electroencephalographic seizure (ES) prediction in critically ill children. Methods: We analyzed data from a prospective observational cohort study of 719 consecutive critically ill children with encephalopathy who underwent clinically-indicated continuous EEG monitoring (CEEG). We implemented and compared three state-of-the-art machine learning methods for ES prediction: (1) random forest; (2) Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO); and (3) Deep Learning Important FeaTures (DeepLIFT). We developed a ranking algorithm based on the relative importance of each variable derived from the machine learning methods. Results: Based on our ranking algorithm, the top five variables for ES prediction were: (1) epileptiform discharges in the initial 30 minutes, (2) clinical seizures prior to CEEG initiation, (3) sex, (4) age dichotomized at 1 year, and (5) epileptic encephalopathy. Compared to the stepwise selection-based approach in logistic regression, the top variables selected by our ranking algorithm were more informative as models utilizing the top variables achieved better prediction performance evaluated by prediction accuracy, AUROC and F1 score. Adding additional variables did not improve and sometimes worsened model performance. Conclusion: The ranking algorithm was helpful in deriving a parsimonious model for ES prediction with optimal performance. However, application of state-of-the-art machine learning models did not substantially improve model performance compared to prior logistic regression models. Thus, to further improve the ES prediction, we may need to collect more samples and variables that provide additional information.
引用
收藏
页码:61 / 68
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Safety of intravenous lacosamide in critically ill children
    Welsh, Sarah S.
    Lin, Nan
    Topjian, Alexis A.
    Abend, Nicholas S.
    SEIZURE-EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF EPILEPSY, 2017, 52 : 76 - 80
  • [32] A Review of Long-term EEG Monitoring in Critically Ill Children With Hypoxic-Ischemic Encephalopathy, Congenital Heart Disease, ECMO, and Stroke
    Abend, Nicholas S.
    Dlugos, Dennis J.
    Clancy, Robert R.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2013, 30 (02) : 134 - 142
  • [33] Use of EEG in critically ill children and neonates in the United States of America
    Gainza-Lein, Marina
    Sanchez Fernandez, Ivan
    Loddenkemper, Tobias
    JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY, 2017, 264 (06) : 1165 - 1173
  • [34] Epileptic seizures in critically ill patients
    Stasiukyniene, Virginija
    Pilvinis, Vidas
    Reingardiene, Dagmara
    Janauskaite, Liuda
    MEDICINA-LITHUANIA, 2009, 45 (06): : 501 - 507
  • [35] Time-Dependent Risk of Seizures in Critically Ill Patients on Continuous Electroencephalogram
    Struck, Aaron F.
    Osman, Gamaleldin
    Rampal, Nishi
    Biswal, Siddhartha
    Legros, Benjamin
    Hirsch, Lawrence J.
    Westover, M. Brandon
    Gaspard, Nicolas
    ANNALS OF NEUROLOGY, 2017, 82 (02) : 177 - 185
  • [36] Continuous Electroencephalographic Monitoring in Critically Ill Patients: Indications, Limitations, and Strategies
    Sutter, Raoul
    Stevens, Robert D.
    Kaplan, Peter W.
    CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2013, 41 (04) : 1124 - 1132
  • [37] Interobserver Reproducibility of Electroencephalogram Interpretation in Critically Ill Children
    Abend, Nicholas S.
    Gutierrez-Colina, Ana
    Zhao, Huaqing
    Guo, Rong
    Marsh, Eric
    Clancy, Robert R.
    Dlugos, Dennis J.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2011, 28 (01) : 15 - 19
  • [38] Continuous Electroencephalography Monitoring in Critically Ill Infants and Children
    Griffith, Jennifer L.
    Tomko, Stuart T.
    Guerriero, Rejean M.
    PEDIATRIC NEUROLOGY, 2020, 108 : 40 - 46
  • [39] The probability of seizures during EEG monitoring in critically ill adults
    Westover, M. Brandon
    Shafi, Mouhsin M.
    Bianchi, Matt T.
    Moura, Lidia M. V. R.
    O'Rourke, Deirdre
    Rosenthal, Eric S.
    Chu, Catherine J.
    Donovan, Samantha
    Hoch, Daniel B.
    Kilbride, Ronan D.
    Cole, Andrew J.
    Cash, Sydney S.
    CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2015, 126 (03) : 463 - 471
  • [40] Development and validation of the creatinine clearance predictor machine learning models in critically ill adults
    Chao-Yuan Huang
    Fabian Güiza
    Pieter Wouters
    Liese Mebis
    Giorgia Carra
    Jan Gunst
    Philippe Meersseman
    Michael Casaer
    Greet Van den Berghe
    Greet De Vlieger
    Geert Meyfroidt
    Critical Care, 27