Verapamil increases the survival of patients with anthracycline-resistant metastatic breast carcinoma

被引:111
作者
Belpomme, D
Gauthier, S
Pujade-Lauraine, E
Facchini, T
Goudier, MJ
Krakowski, I
Netter-Pinon, G
Frenay, M
Gousset, C
Marié, FN
Benmiloud, M
Sturtz, F
机构
[1] Hop Boucicaut, Dept Oncol, F-75015 Paris, France
[2] Hotel Dieu, Paris, France
[3] Polyclin Courlancy, Reims, France
[4] Hop Bodelio, Lorient, France
[5] Ctr Alexis Vautrin, Vandoeuvre Nancy, France
[6] Hop Gen, Meaux, France
[7] Ctr Antoine Lacassagne, F-06054 Nice, France
关键词
5-FU continuous infusion; metastatic breast carcinoma; multidrug resistance; verapamil;
D O I
10.1023/A:1026556119020
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: Verapamil (VER), a potent calcium channel blocker, has been found to overcome P-gp-mediated multi-drug resistance (MDR) and to increase sensitivity to cytotoxic anticancer drugs in refractory myeloma and non-Hodgkin lymphoma. The value of VER for treating solid tumors is still a matter for debate. Patients and methods: We performed a prospective study in 99 patients with anthracycline-resistant metastatic breast carcinoma (MBC), to assess the clinical effect of oral VER given in association with chemotherapy. Instead of retreating patients with anthracycline, we used a partially noncross-resistant regimen (VF), combining vindesine (VDS) and 5-fluorouracil given as a continuous infusion (5-FU CI). Patients were randomly assigned to two cohorts. One cohort (47 patients) was treated in 28-day cycles, each involving the administration of VDS (3 mg/m(2) i.v. bolus on days 1 and 10) and 5-FU CI, (400 mg/m(2)/day i.v. from day 1 to day 10). The other cohort (52 patients) received the same VDS and 5-FU treatment and an additional oral VER treatment (240 mg/day divided in 2 doses), from day 1 to day 28 of each cycle. Patients were treated until progression. Results: The treatment was well tolerated and no side effects that could be attributed to VER were detected. Patients treated with VER had longer overall survival (OS) (median OS: 323 vs. 209 days, P = 0.036) and a higher response rate (27% vs. 11%, P = 0.04) than those not given VER. Progression-free survival (PFS) was also longer but the difference was not statistically significant (median PFS: 4.6 and 2.7 months for the VER and non-VER groups respectively, P = 0.6). Conclusions: This clinical trial demonstrates that a chemosensitizer, such as VER, can increase the survival of MBC patients with acquired anthracycline resistance.
引用
收藏
页码:1471 / 1476
页数:6
相关论文
共 48 条
[1]   Biochemical, cellular, and pharmacological aspects of the multidrug transporter [J].
Ambudkar, SV ;
Dey, S ;
Hrycyna, CA ;
Ramachandra, M ;
Pastan, I ;
Gottesman, MM .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF PHARMACOLOGY AND TOXICOLOGY, 1999, 39 :361-398
[2]   EXPRESSION OF P-GLYCOPROTEIN IN HIGH-GRADE OSTEOSARCOMAS IN RELATION TO CLINICAL OUTCOME [J].
BALDINI, N ;
SCOTLANDI, K ;
BARBANTIBRODANO, G ;
MANARA, MC ;
MAURICI, D ;
BACCI, G ;
BERTONI, F ;
PICCI, P ;
SOTTILI, S ;
CAMPANACCI, M ;
SERRA, M .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1995, 333 (21) :1380-1385
[3]  
Beck WT, 1996, CANCER RES, V56, P3010
[4]  
BIEDLER JL, 1994, CANCER RES, V54, P666
[5]  
Breier A, 1998, NEOPLASMA, V45, P248
[6]  
CAIRO MS, 1989, CANCER RES, V49, P1063
[7]  
CANTWELL B, 1985, P AM SOC CLIN ONCOL, P4
[8]  
DALTON WS, 1989, BLOOD, V73, P747
[9]  
DALTON WS, 1995, CANCER, V75, P815, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(19950201)75:3<815::AID-CNCR2820750311>3.0.CO
[10]  
2-R