Saturation of a turbulent mixing layer over a cavity: response to harmonic forcing around mean flows

被引:17
作者
Boujo, E. [1 ]
Bauerheim, M. [1 ]
Noiray, N. [1 ]
机构
[1] Swiss Fed Inst Technol, CAPS Lab, Mech & Proc Engn Dept, CH-8092 Zurich, Switzerland
关键词
acoustics; instability; turbulent flows; BACKWARD-FACING STEP; LINEAR-STABILITY ANALYSIS; CYLINDER WAKE; SENSITIVITY-ANALYSIS; COHERENT STRUCTURES; REYNOLDS-NUMBER; SHEAR LAYERS; LOOP CONTROL; INSTABILITIES; OSCILLATIONS;
D O I
10.1017/jfm.2018.568
中图分类号
O3 [力学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0801 ;
摘要
Turbulent mixing layers over cavities can couple with acoustic waves and lead to undesired oscillations. To understand the nonlinear aspects of this phenomenon, a turbulent mixing layer over a deep cavity is considered and its response to harmonic forcing is analysed with large-eddy simulations (LES) and linearised Navier-Stokes equations (LNSE). The Reynolds number is Re = 150 000. As a model of incoming acoustic perturbations, spatially uniform time-harmonic velocity forcing is applied at the cavity end, with amplitudes spanning the wide range 0.045-8.9 % of the main channel bulk velocity. Compressible LES provide reference nonlinear responses of the shear layer, and the associated mean flows. Linear responses are calculated with the incompressible LNSE around the LES mean flows; they predict well the amplification (both measured with kinetic energy and with a proxy for vortex sound production in the mixing layer) and capture the nonlinear saturation observed as the forcing amplitude increases and the mixing layer thickens. Perhaps surprisingly, LNSE calculations based on a monochromatic (single-frequency) assumption yield a good agreement even though higher harmonics and their nonlinear interaction (Reynolds stresses) are not negligible. However, it is found that the leading Reynolds stresses do not force the mixing layer efficiently, as shown by a comparison with the optimal volume forcing obtained from a resolvent analysis. Therefore they cannot fully benefit from the potential for amplification available in the flow. Finally, the sensitivity of the optimal harmonic forcing at the cavity end is computed with an adjoint method. The sensitivities to mean flow modification and to a localised feedback (structural sensitivity) both identify the upstream cavity corner as the region where a small-amplitude modification has the strongest effect. This can guide in a systematic way the design of strategies aiming at controlling the amplification and saturation mechanisms.
引用
收藏
页码:386 / 418
页数:33
相关论文
共 60 条
  • [1] Alvarez J. O., 2004, 10 AIAA CEAS AER C A
  • [2] Closed-loop control of an open cavity flow using reduced-order models
    Barbagallo, Alexandre
    Sipp, Denis
    Schmid, Peter J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FLUID MECHANICS, 2009, 641 : 1 - 50
  • [3] Linear analysis of the cylinder wake mean flow
    Barkley, D.
    [J]. EUROPHYSICS LETTERS, 2006, 75 (05): : 750 - 756
  • [4] Conditions for validity of mean flow stability analysis
    Beneddine, Samir
    Sipp, Denis
    Arnault, Anthony
    Dandois, Julien
    Lesshafft, Lutz
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FLUID MECHANICS, 2016, 798 : 485 - 504
  • [5] The effect of base flow variation on flow stability
    Bottaro, A
    Corbett, P
    Luchini, P
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FLUID MECHANICS, 2003, 476 : 293 - 302
  • [6] Sensitivity and open-loop control of stochastic response in a noise amplifier flow: the backward-facing step
    Boujo, E.
    Gallaire, F.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FLUID MECHANICS, 2015, 762 : 361 - 392
  • [7] Open-loop control of noise amplification in a separated boundary layer flow
    Boujo, E.
    Ehrenstein, U.
    Gallaire, F.
    [J]. PHYSICS OF FLUIDS, 2013, 25 (12)
  • [8] Effect of base-flow variation in noise amplifiers: the flat-plate boundary layer
    Brandt, Luca
    Sipp, Denis
    Pralits, Jan O.
    Marquet, Olivier
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FLUID MECHANICS, 2011, 687 : 503 - 528
  • [9] Cain A. B., MODELING PREDICTION
  • [10] Global instabilities in spatially developing flows: Non-normality and nonlinearity
    Chomaz, JM
    [J]. ANNUAL REVIEW OF FLUID MECHANICS, 2005, 37 (37) : 357 - 392