Assessment of rapidly advancing bone age during puberty on elbow radiographs using a deep neural network model

被引:12
作者
Ahn, Kyung-Sik [1 ]
Bae, Byeonguk [2 ]
Jang, Woo Young [3 ]
Lee, Jin Hyuck [4 ]
Oh, Saelin [1 ]
Kim, Baek Hyun [5 ]
Lee, Si Wook [6 ]
Jung, Hae Woon [7 ]
Lee, Jae Won [2 ]
Sung, Jinkyeong [2 ]
Jung, Kyu-Hwan [2 ]
Kang, Chang Ho [1 ]
Lee, Soon Hyuck [3 ]
机构
[1] Korea Univ, Dept Radiol, Anam Hosp, Seoul, South Korea
[2] VUNO Inc, Seoul, South Korea
[3] Korea Univ, Dept Orthoped Surg, Anam Hosp, 73 Goryeodae Ro, Seoul 02841, South Korea
[4] Korea Univ, Anam Hosp, Dept Sports Med, Coll Med, Seoul, South Korea
[5] Korea Univ, Dept Radiol, Ansan Hosp, Gyeonggi Do, South Korea
[6] Keimyung Univ, Dongsan Med Ctr, Sch Med, Dept Orthoped Surg, Daegu, South Korea
[7] Kyung Hee Univ Hosp, Dept Pediat, Seoul, South Korea
基金
新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词
Puberty; Elbow; Artificial intelligence; PEAK HEIGHT VELOCITY; IDIOPATHIC SCOLIOSIS; SAUVEGRAIN METHOD; SKELETAL AGE; ACCURACY; MATURITY;
D O I
10.1007/s00330-021-08096-1
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Objectives Bone age is considered an indicator for the diagnosis of precocious or delayed puberty and a predictor of adult height. We aimed to evaluate the performance of a deep neural network model in assessing rapidly advancing bone age during puberty using elbow radiographs. Methods In all, 4437 anteroposterior and lateral pairs of elbow radiographs were obtained from pubertal individuals from two institutions to implement and validate a deep neural network model. The reference standard bone age was established by five trained researchers using the Sauvegrain method, a scoring system based on the shapes of the lateral condyle, trochlea, olecranon apophysis, and proximal radial epiphysis. A test set (n = 141) was obtained from an external institution. The differences between the assessment of the model and that of reviewers were compared. Results The mean absolute difference (MAD) in bone age estimation between the model and reviewers was 0.15 years on internal validation. In the test set, the MAD between the model and the five experts ranged from 0.19 to 0.30 years. Compared with the reference standard, the MAD was 0.22 years. Interobserver agreement was excellent among reviewers (ICC: 0.99) and between the model and the reviewers (ICC: 0.98). In the subpart analysis, the olecranon apophysis exhibited the highest accuracy (74.5%), followed by the trochlea (73.7%), lateral condyle (73.7%), and radial epiphysis (63.1%). Conclusions Assessment of rapidly advancing bone age during puberty on elbow radiographs using our deep neural network model was similar to that of experts.
引用
收藏
页码:8947 / 8955
页数:9
相关论文
共 25 条
  • [1] Skeletal age assessment from the olecranon for idiopathic scoliosis at risser grade 0
    Charles, Yann Philippe
    Dimeglio, Alain
    Canavese, Federico
    Daures, Jean-Pierre
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2007, 89A (12) : 2737 - 2744
  • [2] Significance of peak height velocity as a predictive factor for curve progression in patients with idiopathic scoliosis
    Chazono, Masaaki
    Tanaka, Takaaki
    Marumo, Keishi
    Kono, Katsuki
    Suzuki, Nobumasa
    [J]. SCOLIOSIS AND SPINAL DISORDERS, 2015, 10
  • [3] Bone age assessment with various machine learning techniques: A systematic literature review and meta-analysis
    Dallora, Ana Luiza
    Anderberg, Peter
    Kvist, Ola
    Mendes, Emilia
    Ruiz, Sandra Diaz
    Berglund, Johan Sanmartin
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2019, 14 (07):
  • [4] Accuracy of the sauvegrain method in determining skeletal age during puberty
    Diméglio, A
    Charles, YP
    Daures, JP
    De Rosa, V
    Kaboré, B
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2005, 87A (08) : 1689 - 1696
  • [5] Hand Pose Estimation for Pediatric Bone Age Assessment
    Escobar, Maria
    Gonzalez, Cristina
    Torres, Felipe
    Daza, Laura
    Triana, Gustavo
    Arbelaez, Pablo
    [J]. MEDICAL IMAGE COMPUTING AND COMPUTER ASSISTED INTERVENTION - MICCAI 2019, PT VI, 2019, 11769 : 531 - 539
  • [6] The RSNA Pediatric Bone Age Machine Learning Challenge
    Halabi, Safwan S.
    Prevedello, Luciano M.
    Kalpathy-Cramer, Jayashree
    Mamonov, Artem B.
    Bilbily, Alexander
    Cicero, Mark
    Pan, Ian
    Pereira, Lucas Araujo
    Sousa, Rafael Teixeira
    Abdala, Nitamar
    Kitamura, Felipe Campos
    Thodberg, Hans H.
    Chen, Leon
    Shih, George
    Andriole, Katherine
    Kohli, Marc D.
    Erickson, Bradleyj
    Flanders, Adam E.
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2019, 290 (02) : 498 - 503
  • [7] Using the Sauvegrain Method to Predict Peak Height Velocity in Boys and Girls
    Hans, Sarah D.
    Sanders, James O.
    Cooperman, Daniel R.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC ORTHOPAEDICS, 2008, 28 (08) : 836 - 839
  • [8] Lower-limb growth: how predictable are predictions?
    Kelly, Paula M.
    Dimeglio, Alain
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CHILDRENS ORTHOPAEDICS, 2008, 2 (06) : 407 - 415
  • [9] Computerized Bone Age Estimation Using Deep Learning-Based Program: Evaluation of the Accuracy and Efficiency
    Kim, Jeong Rye
    Shim, Woo Hyun
    Yoon, Hee Mang
    Hong, Sang Hyup
    Lee, Jin Seong
    Cho, Young Ah
    Kim, Sangki
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2017, 209 (06) : 1374 - 1380
  • [10] Performance of a Deep-Learning Neural Network Model in Assessing Skeletal Maturity on Pediatric Hand Radiographs
    Larson, David B.
    Chen, Matthew C.
    Lungren, Matthew P.
    Halabi, Safwan S.
    Stence, Nicholas V.
    Langlotz, Curtis P.
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2018, 287 (01) : 313 - 322