Implementation of district-based clinical specialist teams in South Africa: Analysing a new role in a transforming system

被引:14
作者
Oboirien, Kafayat [1 ]
Harris, Bronwyn [1 ]
Goudge, Jane [1 ]
Eyles, John [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Witwatersrand, Fac Hlth Sci, Ctr Hlth Policy, Sch Publ Hlth, ZA-2193 Johannesburg, South Africa
基金
新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词
South Africa; DCST(s); Clinical governance; Implementation; Quality improvement teams; Role; Adaptation; GOVERNANCE;
D O I
10.1186/s12913-018-3377-2
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Improving the quality of health care is a national priority in many countries to help reduce unacceptable levels of variation in health system practices, performance and outcomes. In 2012, South Africa introduced district-based clinical specialist teams (DCSTs) to enhance clinical governance at the lowest level of the health system. This paper examines the expectations and responses of local health system actors in the introduction and early implementation of this new DCST role. Methods: Between 2013 and 2015, we carried out 258 in-depth interviews and three focus group discussions with managers, implementers and intended beneficiaries of the DCST innovation. Data were collected in three districts using a theory of change approach for programme evaluation. We also embarked on role charting through policy document review. Guided by role theory, we analysed data thematically and compared findings across the three districts. Results: We found role ambiguity and conflict in the implementation of the new DCST role. Individual, organisational and systemic factors influenced actors' expectations, behaviours, and adjustments to the new clinical governance role. Local contextual factors affected the composition and scope of DCSTs in each site, while leadership and accountability pathways shaped system adaptiveness across all three. Two key contributions emerge; firstly, the responsiveness of the system to an innovation requires time in planning, roll-out, phasing, and monitoring. Secondly, the interconnectedness of quality improvement processes adds complexity to innovation in clinical governance and may influence the (in) effectiveness of service delivery. Conclusion: Role ambiguity and conflict in the DCST role at a system-wide level suggests the need for effective management of implementation systems. Additionally, improving quality requires anticipating and addressing a shortage of inputs, including financing for additional staff and skills for health care delivery and careful integration of health care policy guidelines.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 49 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], DISTRICT HLTH SYSTEM
  • [2] [Anonymous], CLIN GOVERNANCE INT
  • [3] [Anonymous], MILL DEV GOALS COUNT
  • [4] Begun J.W., 2003, Advances in health care organization theory, V253, P288, DOI DOI 10.1177/009430610403300325
  • [5] RECENT DEVELOPMENTS IN ROLE-THEORY
    BIDDLE, BJ
    [J]. ANNUAL REVIEW OF SOCIOLOGY, 1986, 12 : 67 - 92
  • [6] Boles J.S., 2003, J PERSONAL SELLING S, V23, P99, DOI DOI 10.1080/08853134.2003.10748991
  • [7] Brennan Niamh M., 2013, Clinical Governance, V18, P114, DOI DOI 10.1108/14777271311317909
  • [8] Campbell SM, 2002, BRIT J GEN PRACT, V52, pS12
  • [9] Implementing clinical governance in English primary care groups/trusts: reconciling quality improvement and quality assurance
    Campbell, SM
    Sheaff, R
    Sibbald, B
    Marshall, MN
    Pickard, S
    Gask, L
    Halliwell, S
    Rogers, A
    Roland, MO
    [J]. QUALITY & SAFETY IN HEALTH CARE, 2002, 11 (01): : 9 - 14
  • [10] Role-meanings as a critical factor in understanding doctor managers' identity work and different role identities
    Cascon-Pereira, Rosalia
    Chillas, Shiona
    Hallier, Jerry
    [J]. SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 2016, 170 : 18 - 25