Modeling Nonlinear Structural Equation Models: A Comparison of the Two-Stage Generalized Additive Models and the Finite Mixture Structural Equation Model

被引:13
|
作者
Finch, W. Holmes [1 ]
机构
[1] Ball State Univ, Muncie, IN 47304 USA
关键词
finite mixture SEM; generalized additive model; nonlinear SEM; MAXIMUM-LIKELIHOOD-ESTIMATION; LATENT VARIABLE MODELS; LEAST-SQUARES; 2SLS; BAYESIAN-ANALYSIS;
D O I
10.1080/10705511.2014.935749
中图分类号
O1 [数学];
学科分类号
0701 ; 070101 ;
摘要
Researchers have devoted some time and effort to developing methods for fitting nonlinear relationships among latent variables. In particular, most of these have focused on correctly modeling interactions between 2 exogenous latent variables, and quadratic relationships between exogenous and endogenous variables. All of these approaches require prespecification of the nonlinearity by the researcher, and are limited to fairly simple nonlinear relationships. Other work has been done using mixture structural equation models (SEMM) in an attempt to fit more complex nonlinear relationships. This study expands on this earlier work by introducing the 2-stage generalized additive model (2SGAM) approach for fitting regression splines in the context of structural equation models. The model is first described and then investigated through the use of simulated data, in which it was compared with the SEMM approach. Results demonstrate that the 2SGAM is an effective tool for fitting a variety of nonlinear relationships between latent variables, and can be easily and accurately extended to models including multiple latent variables. Implications of these results are discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:60 / 75
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Model comparison of nonlinear structural equation models with fixed covariates
    Sik-Yum Lee
    Xin-Yuan Song
    Psychometrika, 2003, 68 : 27 - 47
  • [2] Model comparison of nonlinear structural equation models with fixed covariates
    Lee, SY
    Song, XY
    PSYCHOMETRIKA, 2003, 68 (01) : 27 - 47
  • [3] A Comparison of Methods for Uncovering Sample Heterogeneity: Structural Equation Model Trees and Finite Mixture Models
    Jacobucci, Ross
    Grimm, Kevin J.
    McArdle, John J.
    STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING-A MULTIDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL, 2017, 24 (02) : 270 - 282
  • [4] Modeling Model Misspecification in Structural Equation Models
    Robitzsch, Alexander
    STATS, 2023, 6 (02): : 689 - 705
  • [5] Two-stage regression quantiles and two-stage trimmed least squares estimators for structural equation models
    Chen, LA
    Portnoy, S
    COMMUNICATIONS IN STATISTICS-THEORY AND METHODS, 1996, 25 (05) : 1005 - 1032
  • [6] A two-stage estimation procedure for non-linear structural equation models
    Holst, Klaus Kaehler
    Budtz-Jorgensen, Esben
    BIOSTATISTICS, 2020, 21 (04) : 676 - 691
  • [7] Generalized spatial structural equation models
    Liu, X
    Wall, MM
    Hodges, JS
    BIOSTATISTICS, 2005, 6 (04) : 539 - 557
  • [8] A Bayesian Modeling Approach for Generalized Semiparametric Structural Equation Models
    Song, Xin-Yuan
    Lu, Zhao-Hua
    Cai, Jing-Heng
    Ip, Edward Hak-Sing
    PSYCHOMETRIKA, 2013, 78 (04) : 624 - 647
  • [9] A Bayesian Modeling Approach for Generalized Semiparametric Structural Equation Models
    Xin-Yuan Song
    Zhao-Hua Lu
    Jing-Heng Cai
    Edward Hak-Sing Ip
    Psychometrika, 2013, 78 : 624 - 647
  • [10] Nonlinear dynamical structural equation models
    Zhang, Wenyang
    Lee, Sik-Yum
    QUANTITATIVE FINANCE, 2009, 9 (03) : 305 - 314