Health, safety and environmental (HSE) regulation and outcomes in the offshore oil and gas industry: Performance review of trends in the United Kingdom Continental Shelf

被引:14
作者
Acheampong, Theophilus [1 ]
Kemp, Alexander G.
机构
[1] Univ Aberdeen, Business Sch, Dept Econ, Aberdeen AB24 3QY, Scotland
关键词
Health; Safety; Environment; Accidents; Hydrocarbon releases; Cost-benefit analysis; COST-BENEFIT-ANALYSIS; WILLINGNESS-TO-PAY; OCCUPATIONAL-SAFETY; HYDROCARBON LEAKS; STATISTICAL LIFE; RISK; MANAGEMENT; FRAMEWORK; LESSONS; WORK;
D O I
10.1016/j.ssci.2021.105634
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
This paper contributes to understanding health, safety and environmental (HSE) regulation and performance in the offshore oil and gas industry. The United Kingdom Continental Shelf (UKCS) is used to explain how both safety investments by oil companies and regulatory initiatives can collectively contribute to enhancing standards, thereby reducing total accident and incident costs. We apply theoretical and analytical dimensions: firstly, by characterising an economic approach for evaluating HSE investments, and secondly, undertaking comparative statistical analysis of UKCS safety performance. Our findings indicate that the cost-benefit approach has been beneficial for evaluating HSE investment decisions to meet stricter regulatory compliance standards. Regarding the comparative analysis, we find that there has been a considerable improvement in safety in the UKCS over the past two decades, indicated by declining hydrocarbon releases (safety indicator) and declining injury rates (health indicator). Nonetheless, while produced water discharges (environment indicator) have also declined, the data also shows that the frequency of oil spill incidents have increased by 62% compared to 2002 baseline levels. This is partly explained by several recent unplanned shutdowns, especially between 2013 and 2016, and consequent reductions in production efficiency due to ageing infrastructure. Overall, the findings suggest that fair, effective, and participatory regulatory regimes can ensure a collective drive by all stakeholders towards improving industry safety performance and promote a better safety environment.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 79 条
  • [41] Kemp AlexanderG., 2012, The Official History of North Sea Oil and Gas
  • [42] Safety challenges in harsh environments: Lessons learned
    Khan, Faisal
    Ahmed, Salim
    Yang, Ming
    Hashemi, Seyed Javad
    Caines, Susan
    Rathnayaka, Samith
    Oldford, Dan
    [J]. PROCESS SAFETY PROGRESS, 2015, 34 (02) : 191 - 195
  • [43] Kniesner T.J., 2019, IN PRESS, P19
  • [44] KOLSTAD CD, 1990, AM ECON REV, V80, P888
  • [45] Safety climate and hydrocarbon leaks: An empirical contribution to the leading-lagging indicator discussion
    Kongsvik, Trond
    Johnsen, Svein Age Kjos
    Sklet, Snorre
    [J]. JOURNAL OF LOSS PREVENTION IN THE PROCESS INDUSTRIES, 2011, 24 (04) : 405 - 411
  • [46] Safety climate as an indicator for major accident risk: Can we use safety climate as an indicator on the plant level?
    Kvalheim, Sverre Andreas
    Antonsen, Stian
    Haugen, Stein
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DISASTER RISK REDUCTION, 2016, 18 : 23 - 31
  • [47] THE NEW ECONOMICS OF REGULATION 10 YEARS AFTER
    LAFFONT, JJ
    [J]. ECONOMETRICA, 1994, 62 (03) : 507 - 537
  • [49] Leautier T.-O., 2019, Imperfect Markets and Imperfect Regulation: An Introduction to the Microeconomics and Political Economy of Power Markets
  • [50] Lindoe PH, 2014, RISK GOVERNANCE OF OFFSHORE OIL AND GAS OPERATIONS, P1