Plasma Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Concentrations after Intravitreous Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Therapy for Diabetic Macular Edema

被引:33
|
作者
Jampol, Lee M. [1 ]
Glassman, Adam R. [2 ]
Liu, Danni [2 ]
Aiello, Lloyd Paul [3 ]
Bressler, Neil M. [4 ]
Duh, Elia J. [4 ]
Quaggin, Susan [1 ]
Wells, John A. [5 ]
Wykoff, Charles C. [6 ]
机构
[1] Northwestern Univ, Feinberg Sch Med, Chicago, IL 60611 USA
[2] Jaeb Ctr Hlth Res, 15310 Amberly Dr,Suite 350, Tampa, FL 33647 USA
[3] Harvard Dept Ophthalmol, Beetham Eye Inst, Joslin Diabet Ctr, Boston, MA USA
[4] Johns Hopkins Univ, Sch Med, Wilmer Eye Inst, Baltimore, MD 21205 USA
[5] Palmetto Retina Ctr, Columbia, SC USA
[6] Blanton Eye Inst, Retina Consultants Houston, Houston, TX USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
PHARMACOKINETICS; RANIBIZUMAB; BEVACIZUMAB; PREMATURITY; RETINOPATHY; INJECTION; SERUM; DEGENERATION; METAANALYSIS;
D O I
10.1016/j.ophtha.2018.01.019
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Purpose: To assess systemic vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)-A levels after treatment with intravitreous aflibercept, bevacizumab, or ranibizumab. Design: Comparative-effectiveness trial with participants randomly assigned to 2 mg aflibercept, 1.25 mg bevacizumab, or 0.3 mg ranibizumab after a re-treatment algorithm. Participants: Participants with available plasma samples (N = 436). Methods: Plasma samples were collected before injections at baseline and 4-week, 52-week, and 104-week visits. In a preplanned secondary analysis, systemic-free VEGF levels from an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay were compared across anti-VEGF agents and correlated with systemic side effects. Main Outcome Measures: Changes in the natural log (ln) of plasma VEGF levels. Results: Baseline free VEGF levels were similar across all 3 groups. At 4 weeks, mean ln(VEGF) changes were -0.30 +/- 0.61 pg/ml, -0.31 +/- 0.54 pg/ml, and -0.02 +/- 0.44 pg/ml for the aflibercept, bevacizumab, and ranibizumab groups, respectively. The adjusted differences between treatment groups (adjusted confidence interval [CI]; P value) were -0.01 (-0.12 to +0.10; P =0.89), - 0.31 (- 0.44 to -0.18; P < 0.001), and -0.30 (- 0.43 to -0.18; P < 0.001) for aflibercept-bevacizumab, aflibercept-ranibizumab, and bevacizumab-ranibizumab, respectively. At 52 weeks, a difference in mean VEGF changes between bevacizumab and ranibizumab persisted (-0.23 [-0.38 to -0.09]; P < 0.001); the difference between aflibercept and ranibizumab was -0.12 (P = 0.07) and between aflibercept and bevacizumab was thorn0.11 (P = 0.07). Treatment group differences at 2 years were similar to 1 year. No apparent treatment differences were detected at 52 or 104 weeks in the cohort of participants not receiving injections within 1 or 2 months before plasma collection. Participants with (N =9) and without (N= 251) a heart attack or stroke had VEGF levels that appeared similar. Conclusions: These data suggest that decreases in plasma free-VEGF levels are greater after treatment with aflibercept or bevacizumab compared with ranibizumab at 4 weeks. At 52 and 104 weeks, a greater decrease was observed in bevacizumab versus ranibizumab. Results from 2 subgroups of participants who did not receive injections within at least 1 month and 2 months before collection suggest similar changes in VEGF levels after stopping injections. It is unknown whether VEGF levels return to normal as the drug is cleared from the system or whether the presence of the drug affects the assay's ability to accurately measure free VEGF. No significant associations between VEGF concentration and systemic factors were noted. (C) 2018 by the American Academy of Ophthalmology
引用
收藏
页码:1054 / 1063
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条