Development and Validation of a Questionnaire to Assess Social Participation of High Risk-Adults in Germany During the COVID-19 Pandemic

被引:5
作者
Schroeder, Dominik
Heesen, Gloria
Heinemann, Stephanie
Hummers, Eva
Jablonka, Alexandra
Steffens, Sandra
Mikuteit, Marie
Niewolik, Jacqueline
Overbeck, Tobias R.
Kallusky, Jonathan
Mueller, Frank
机构
[1] Department of General Practice, University Medical Center, Göttingen
[2] Department of Rheumatology and Immunology, Hannover Medical School, Hanover
[3] German Center for Infection Research (DZIF), Partner Site Hannover-Braunschweig, Hanover
[4] Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen
关键词
social participation; pandemic questionnaire; COVID-19; SARS-CoV-2; quality of life; questionnaire validation; questionnaire development and validation; INTERNATIONAL CLASSIFICATION; DISABILITY; HEALTH; SCALE;
D O I
10.3389/fpubh.2022.831087
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background:Restrictions to contain the COVID-19 pandemic affect the social participation of people worldwide. Especially those at high risk for a severe disease tend to abstain from social gatherings. While there are a few questionnaires to measure social participation in elderly or chronic patients, a valid survey instrument that includes pandemic-related social participation is needed. MethodsWe developed a social participation questionnaire that aims to assess pandemic-related restrictions in social participation. Items were developed using a theory and literature-based approach and then compiled in a discursive process involving experts and lay people. This was followed by the validation of the questionnaire through a cross-sectional survey on 431 individuals. Items with low item-total correlations and low factor loadings using exploratory factor analysis [EFA] were excluded. Using EFA on the remaining items, the factor structure was retrieved and tested with a confirmatory factor analysis [CFA]. Internal consistency was assessed with Chronbachs alpha. ResultsInitially, 27 items were developed which were used for validation. 13 items were excluded due to low item-total correlations and factors loadings. EFA of the remaining 14 items revealed three factors which were identified as domains "active social participation," "wellbeing," and "restrictions". CFA showed an acceptable model fit using the three-dimensional structure. Chronbachs alpha of 0.81 and McDonalds omega of 0.87 indicate good internal consistency. Correlation analysis showed an association between the developed questionnaire and previously-established participation and mental health scales. ConclusionThis study suggests that our 14 item questionnaire is of high reliability and validity and can be used to measure social participation during a pandemic.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 53 条
  • [1] Alexis D, 2018, PACKAGEPARAN
  • [2] COVID-19 Home Confinement Negatively Impacts Social Participation and Life Satisfaction: A Worldwide Multicenter Study
    Ammar, Achraf
    Chtourou, Hamdi
    Boukhris, Omar
    Trabelsi, Khaled
    Masmoudi, Liwa
    Brach, Michael
    Bouaziz, Bassem
    Bentlage, Ellen
    How, Daniella
    Ahmed, Mona
    Mueller, Patrick
    Mueller, Notger
    Hsouna, Hsen
    Aloui, Asma
    Hammouda, Omar
    Paineiras-Domingos, Laisa Liane
    Braakman-Jansen, Annemarie
    Wrede, Christian
    Bastoni, Sophia
    Pernambuco, Carlos Soares
    Mataruna-Dos-Santos, Leonardo Jose
    Taheri, Morteza
    Irandoust, Khadijeh
    Khacharem, Aimen
    Bragazzi, Nicola L.
    Strahler, Jana
    Washif, Jad Adrian
    Andreeva, Albina
    Khoshnami, Samira C.
    Samara, Evangelia
    Zisi, Vasiliki
    Sankar, Parasanth
    Ahmed, Waseem N.
    Romdhani, Mohamed
    Delhey, Jan
    Bailey, Stephen J.
    Bott, Nicholas T.
    Gargouri, Faiez
    Chaari, Lotfi
    Batatia, Hadj
    Ali, Gamal Mohamed
    Abdelkarim, Osama
    Jarraya, Mohamed
    El Abed, Kais
    Souissi, Nizar
    Van Gemert-Pijnen, Lisette
    Riemann, Bryan L.
    Riemann, Laurel
    Moalla, Wassim
    Gomez-Raja, Jonathan
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2020, 17 (17) : 1 - 17
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2005, EFFECT MODEL MISSPEC
  • [4] Best Practices for Developing and Validating Scales for Health,Social, and Behavioral Research:A Primer
    Boateng, Godfred O.
    Neilands, Torsten B.
    Frongillo, Edward A.
    Melgar-Quinonez, Hugo R.
    Young, Sera L.
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN PUBLIC HEALTH, 2018, 6
  • [5] Validation of the United States' version of the World Health Organization Quality of Life (WHOQOL) instrument
    Bonomi, AE
    Patrick, DL
    Bushnell, DM
    Martin, M
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2000, 53 (01) : 1 - 12
  • [6] Bundesministerium furArbeitundSoziales., 2021, DRITTER TEILHABEBERI
  • [7] Reliability, Population Classification and Weighting in Multidimensional Poverty Measurement: A Monte Carlo Study
    Catalan, Hector E. Najera
    [J]. SOCIAL INDICATORS RESEARCH, 2019, 142 (03) : 887 - 910
  • [8] Cohen J., 1988, STAT POWER ANAL BEHA, P75
  • [9] Darren G., 2003, SPPS WINDOWS STEP ST, V7th
  • [10] Limitations of Social Participation in General Population - Normative Data of the IMET based on a Population-Based Survey in Northern Germany
    Deck, R.
    Walther, A. L.
    Staupendahl, A.
    Katalinic, A.
    [J]. REHABILITATION, 2015, 54 (06) : 402 - 408