Statistical Literacy in Obstetricians and Gynecologists

被引:25
作者
Anderson, Britta L. [1 ]
Gigerenzer, Gerd [2 ,3 ]
Parker, Scott [4 ,5 ]
Schulkin, Jay [1 ,6 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Amer Coll Obstetricians & Gynecologists, Washington, DC 20024 USA
[2] Max Planck Inst Human Dev, Berlin, Germany
[3] Harding Ctr Risk Literacy, Berlin, Germany
[4] Amer Univ, Washington, DC 20016 USA
[5] Amer Univ, Affiliated Fac, Dept Math & Stat, Washington, DC 20016 USA
[6] Georgetown Univ, Dept Neurosci, Washington, DC 20057 USA
[7] NIMH, Behav Endocrinol Branch, Washington, DC USA
关键词
academic; evidence-based practice/guidelines; practice setting/focus; research; research-evaluation; topics; NUMERACY; COMMUNICATION;
D O I
10.1111/j.1945-1474.2011.00194.x
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
The Obstetrician-Gynecologist Statistical Literacy Questionnaire (OGSLQ) was designed to examine physicians' understanding of various number tasks that are relevant to obstetrician-gynecologists (ob-gyns) practice. Forty-seven percent of the nationally representative, practicing ob-gyns responded. Physicians did poorly on the questions about numerical facts (e.g., number of women living with HIV/AIDS), better on questions about statistical concepts (e.g., incidence, prevalence), and best on questions about numerical relationships (e.g., convert frequency to percentage) with 0%, 7%, 36%, answering all correctly, respectively. Only 19% correctly estimated the number of U.S. women with cancer. Sixty-six percent were able to use sensitivity and specificity to choose a test option. Around 90% could translate between frequency and probability formats. Forty-nine percent of respondents were able to calculate the positive predictive value of a mammography screening test. Physicians lack some understanding of statistical literacy. It is important that we monitor physicians' statistical literacy and provide training to students and physicians.
引用
收藏
页码:5 / 17
页数:13
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]  
Anderson B., 2008, Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, V57, P65
[2]   Physicians' communication of Down syndrome screening test results: The influence of physician numeracy [J].
Anderson, Britta L. ;
Obrecht, Natalie A. ;
Chapman, Gretchen B. ;
Driscoll, Deborah A. ;
Schulkin, Jay .
GENETICS IN MEDICINE, 2011, 13 (08) :744-749
[3]   Factors Associated With Physicians' Reliance on Pharmaceutical Sales Representatives [J].
Anderson, Britta L. ;
Silverman, Gabriel K. ;
Loewenstein, George F. ;
Zinberg, Stanley ;
Schulkin, Jay .
ACADEMIC MEDICINE, 2009, 84 (08) :994-1002
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2007, Psychological science in the public interest, DOI DOI 10.1111/J.1539-6053.2008.00033.X
[5]   Numeracy and Communication with Patients: They Are Counting on Us [J].
Apter, Andrea J. ;
Paasche-Orlow, Michael K. ;
Remillard, Janine T. ;
Bennett, Ian M. ;
Ben-Joseph, Elana Pearl ;
Batista, Rosanna M. ;
Hyde, James ;
Rudd, Rima E. .
JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2008, 23 (12) :2117-2124
[6]   A meta-analysis of the effects of presenting treatment benefits in different formats [J].
Covey, Judith .
MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 2007, 27 (05) :638-654
[7]   Health literacy and numeracy [J].
Estrada, C ;
Barnes, V ;
Collins, C .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1999, 282 (06) :527-527
[8]   Measuring numeracy without a Math test: Development of the subjective numeracy scale [J].
Fagerlin, Angela ;
Zikmund-Fisher, Brian J. ;
Ubel, Peter A. ;
Jankovic, Aleksandra ;
Derry, Holly A. ;
Smith, Dylan M. .
MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 2007, 27 (05) :672-680
[9]   ABSOLUTELY RELATIVE - HOW RESEARCH RESULTS ARE SUMMARIZED CAN AFFECT TREATMENT DECISIONS [J].
FORROW, L ;
TAYLOR, WC ;
ARNOLD, RM .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1992, 92 (02) :121-124
[10]   Statistical Numeracy for Health A Cross-cultural Comparison With Probabilistic National Samples [J].
Galesic, Mirta ;
Garcia-Retamero, Rocio .
ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2010, 170 (05) :462-468