Agricultural land use changes - a scenario-based sustainability impact assessment for Brandenburg, Germany

被引:123
作者
Gutzler, C. [1 ]
Helming, K. [1 ]
Balla, D. [2 ]
Dannowski, R. [2 ]
Deumlich, D. [3 ]
Glemnitz, M. [4 ]
Knierim, A. [5 ,7 ]
Mirschel, W. [6 ]
Nendel, C. [6 ]
Paul, C. [5 ]
Sieber, S. [5 ]
Stachow, U. [4 ]
Starick, A. [5 ]
Wieland, R. [6 ]
Wurbs, A. [4 ]
Zander, P. [5 ]
机构
[1] Leibniz Ctr Agr Landscape Res ZALF, Muncheberg, Germany
[2] Leibniz Ctr Agr Landscape Res ZALF, Inst Landscape Hydrol, Muncheberg, Germany
[3] Leibniz Ctr Agr Landscape Res ZALF, Inst Soil Landscape Res, Muncheberg, Germany
[4] Leibniz Ctr Agr Landscape Res ZALF, Inst Land Use Syst, Muncheberg, Germany
[5] Leibniz Ctr Agr Landscape Res ZALF, Inst Socio Econ, Muncheberg, Germany
[6] Leibniz Ctr Agr Landscape Res ZALF, Inst Landscape Syst Anal, Muncheberg, Germany
[7] Univ Hohenheim, Dept Rural Sociol, Stuttgart, Germany
关键词
Scenarios; Impact assessment; Agricultural intensification; Land use change; Irrigation; Bioenergy; Social and environmental indicators; LANDSCAPE; MODEL;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecolind.2014.09.004
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
Decisions for agricultural management are taken at farm scale. However, such decisions may well impact upon regional sustainability. Two of the likely agricultural management responses to future challenges are extended use of irrigation and increased production of energy crops. The drivers for these are high commodity prices and subsidy policies for renewable energy. However, the impacts of these responses upon regional sustainability are unknown. Thus, we conducted integrated impact assessments for agricultural intensification scenarios in the federal state of Brandenburg, Germany, for 2025. One Irrigation scenario and one Energy scenario were contrasted with the Business As Usual (BAU) scenario. We applied nine indicators to analyze the economic, social and environmental effects at the regional, in this case district scale, which is the smallest administrative unit in Brandenburg. Assessment results were discussed in a stakeholder workshop involving 16 experts from the state government. The simulated area shares of silage maize for fodder and energy were 29%, 37% and 49% for the BAU, Irrigation, and Energy scenarios, respectively. The Energy scenario increased bio-electricity production to 41% of the demand of Brandenburg, and it resulted in CO2 savings of up to 3.5 million tons. However, it resulted in loss of biodiversity, loss of landscape scenery, increased soil erosion risk, and increased area demand for water protection requirements. The Irrigation scenario led to yield increases of 7% (rapeseed), 18% (wheat, sugar beet), and 40% (maize) compared to the BAU scenario. It also reduced the year-to-year yield variability. Water demand for irrigation was found to be in conflict with other water uses for two of the 14 districts. Spatial differentiation of scenario impacts showed that districts with medium to low yield potentials were more affected by negative impacts than districts with high yield potentials. In this first comprehensive sustainability impact assessment of agricultural intensification scenarios at regional level, we showed that a considerable potential for agricultural intensification exists. The intensification is accompanied by adverse environmental and socio-economic impacts. The novelty lies in the multiscale integration of comprehensive, agricultural management simulations with regional level impact assessment, which was achieved with the adequate use of indicators. It provided relevant evidence for policy decision making. Stakeholders appreciated the integrative approach of the assessment, which substantiated ongoing discussions among the government bodies. The assessment approach and the Brandenburg case study may stay exemplary for other regions in the world where similar economic and policy driving forces are likely to lead to agricultural intensification. (C) 2014 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:505 / 517
页数:13
相关论文
共 42 条
[1]   Energy from biomass in the UK: Sources, processes and biodiversity implications [J].
Anderson, Guy Q. A. ;
Fergusson, Malcolm J. .
IBIS, 2006, 148 :180-183
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2007, NATL STRATEGY BIOL D
[3]  
Asseng S, 2013, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V3, P827, DOI [10.1038/nclimate1916, 10.1038/NCLIMATE1916]
[4]  
Brandt K., 2013, ENVIRON MONIT ASSESS
[5]  
Collins Kevin, 2009, European Environment, V19, P358, DOI 10.1002/eet.523
[6]  
Deumlich Detlef, 2005, Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science, V51, P447, DOI 10.1080/03650340500186397
[7]   Life cycle assessment of the supply and use of bioenergy: impact of regional factors on biogas production [J].
Dressler, Daniela ;
Loewen, Achim ;
Nelles, Michael .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2012, 17 (09) :1104-1115
[8]  
DWA, 2012, GEW 1
[9]  
Federal Statistical Office Germany, 2011, FACHS FED STAT OFF G
[10]  
FNR, 2010, BIOG MESSPR 2 61 BIO