Fatigue resistance of an aluminium one-component polyurethane adhesive joint for the automotive industry: Effect of surface roughness and adhesive thickness

被引:54
作者
Boutar, Y. [1 ]
Naimi, S. [1 ]
Mezlini, S. [1 ]
Carbas, R. J. C. [2 ]
da Silva, L. F. M. [2 ]
Ali, M. Ben Sik [3 ]
机构
[1] Monastir Univ, Natl Engn Sch Monastir, Mech Engn Lab, Monastir, Tunisia
[2] Univ Porto, Fac Engn, Dept Engn Mecan, Porto, Portugal
[3] Automot Ind, ICAR, Sousse, Tunisia
关键词
Single lap joint; Polyurethane adhesive; Surface roughness; Adhesive thickness; Fatigue life; SINGLE-LAP JOINTS; BONDED ALUMINUM; BEHAVIOR; LIFE; PRETREATMENT; PERFORMANCE; COMPOSITES; STRENGTH; FRACTURE; GROWTH;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2018.02.012
中图分类号
TQ [化学工业];
学科分类号
0817 ;
摘要
Fatigue is a crucial type of loading for many structural components that contain adhesive bonding systems such as the automotive industry. One of the main advantages of adhesives is their weight-reduction aptitudes. Furthermore, adhesively bonded joints allow a good damping to the fatigue's solicitation with fewer sources of stress concentration. In addition, a suitable surface treatment allows a great joint interface adhesion under cyclic loading. Hence, the mechanical preparation of the bonded surface influences directly the bonded joint performance. Therefore, a careful consideration should be given to the choice of the bonded adhesive thickness. The aim of this paper is to investigate the influence of surface roughness of an aluminium alloy and the adhesive thickness of a one-component polyurethane adhesive, to be used in several parts for buses structure, on the fatigue behaviour of single lap joints. To achieve this purpose, four different surface roughnesses were prepared on aluminium specimens, with an arithmetic average height from Ra approximate to 0.6 mu m to Ra approximate to 1.5 mu m. Bonded specimens with four adhesive thicknesses from 0.3 mm to 2 mm were manufactured and tested in dynamic tests. The results confirm that there is an optimum combination of surface roughness and adhesive thickness providing the maximum fatigue life. Moreover, good agreement was found between this investigation and a previous work using the same parameters under static loading.
引用
收藏
页码:143 / 152
页数:10
相关论文
共 26 条
[21]   Methods for the prediction of fatigue delamination growth in composites and adhesive bonds - A critical review [J].
Pascoe, J. A. ;
Alderliesten, R. C. ;
Benedictus, R. .
ENGINEERING FRACTURE MECHANICS, 2013, 112 :72-96
[22]   Study on the fatigue strength of AA 6082-T6 adhesive lap joints [J].
Pereira, A. M. ;
Ferreira, J. M. ;
Antunes, F. V. ;
Bartolo, P. J. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADHESION AND ADHESIVES, 2009, 29 (06) :633-638
[23]   The effect of surface pretreatment and moisture on the fatigue performance of adhesively-bonded aluminium [J].
Rushforth, MW ;
Bowen, P ;
McAlpine, E ;
Zhou, X ;
Thompson, GE .
JOURNAL OF MATERIALS PROCESSING TECHNOLOGY, 2004, 153 :359-365
[24]   Strength wearout of adhesively bonded joints under constant amplitude fatigue [J].
Shenoy, V. ;
Ashcroft, I. A. ;
CritchloW, G. W. ;
Crocombe, A. D. ;
Wahab, M. M. Abdel .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FATIGUE, 2009, 31 (05) :820-830
[25]   An investigation into the crack initiation and propagation behaviour of bonded single-lap joints using backface strain [J].
Shenoy, V. ;
Ashcroft, I. A. ;
Critchlow, G. W. ;
Crocombe, A. D. ;
Wahab, M. M. Abdel .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADHESION AND ADHESIVES, 2009, 29 (04) :361-371
[26]   The effect of warm water surface treatments on the fatigue life in shear of aluminum joints [J].
Underhill, PR ;
Rider, AN ;
DuQuesnay, DL .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADHESION AND ADHESIVES, 2006, 26 (04) :199-205