No Body Is Expendable: Medical Rationing and Disability Justice During the COVID-19 Pandemic

被引:92
作者
Andrews, Erin E. [1 ,2 ]
Ayers, Kara B. [3 ,4 ]
Brown, Kathleen S.
Dunn, Dana S. [5 ]
Pilarski, Carrie R. [6 ]
机构
[1] VA Texas Valley Coastal Bend Hlth Care Syst, 2601 Vet Dr 116B, Harlingen, TX 78550 USA
[2] Univ Texas, Austin Med Sch, Dept Psychiat, Harlingen, TX USA
[3] Cincinnati Childrens Hosp Med Ctr, Div Dev & Behav Pediat, Cincinnati, OH USA
[4] Univ Cincinnati, Coll Med, Dept Pediat, Cincinnati, OH USA
[5] Moravian Coll, Dept Psychol, Bethlehem, PA USA
[6] Univ Michigan, Div Rehabil Psychol Neuropsychol, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
关键词
disability justice; medical rationing; COVID-19; pandemic; ableism; advocacy; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; STAFF PERCEPTIONS; HEALTH; ATTITUDES; PEOPLE; CARE; PERSONNEL; DISTRESS; PARADOX; WOMEN;
D O I
10.1037/amp0000709
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
The health threat posed by the novel coronavirus that caused the COVID-19 pandemic has particular implications for people with disabilities, including vulnerability to exposure and complications, and concerns about the role of ableism in access to treatment and medical rationing decisions. Shortages of necessary medical equipment to treat COVID-19 have prompted triage guidelines outlining the ways in which lifesaving equipment, such as mechanical ventilators and intensive care unit beds, may need to be rationed among affected individuals. In this article, we explore the realities of medical rationing, and various approaches to triage and prioritization. We discuss the psychology of ableism, perceptions about quality of life, social determinants of health, and how attitudes toward disability can affect rationing decisions and access to care. In addition to the grassroots advocacy and activism undertaken by the disability community, psychology is rich in its contributions to the role of attitudes, prejudice, and discriminatory behavior on the social fabric of society. We call on psychologists to advocate for social justice in pandemic preparedness, promote disability justice in health care settings, call for transparency and accountability in rationing approaches, and support policy changes for macro- and microallocation strategies to proactively reduce the need for rationing.
引用
收藏
页码:451 / 461
页数:11
相关论文
共 90 条
  • [1] Review of gynecologic and reproductive care for women with developmental disabilities
    Abells, Dara
    Kirkham, Yolanda A.
    Ornstein, Melanie P.
    [J]. CURRENT OPINION IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2016, 28 (05) : 350 - 358
  • [2] Staff perceptions of emotional distress in patients with burn trauma
    Adcock, RJ
    Goldberg, ML
    Patterson, DR
    Brown, PB
    [J]. REHABILITATION PSYCHOLOGY, 2000, 45 (02) : 179 - 192
  • [3] The disability paradox: high quality of life against all odds
    Albrecht, GL
    Devlieger, PJ
    [J]. SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 1999, 48 (08) : 977 - 988
  • [4] Amundson R., 2005, Quality of Life and Human Difference: Genetic Testing, Health Care, and Disability, P101, DOI DOI 10.1017/CBO9780511614590.005
  • [5] Quality of Life, Disability, and Hedonic Psychology
    Amundson, Ron
    [J]. JOURNAL FOR THE THEORY OF SOCIAL BEHAVIOUR, 2010, 40 (04) : 374 - +
  • [6] TOWARD UNDERSTANDING THE ASSOCIATION OF SOCIOECONOMIC-STATUS AND HEALTH - A NEW CHALLENGE FOR THE BIOPSYCHOSOCIAL APPROACH
    ANDERSON, NB
    ARMSTEAD, CA
    [J]. PSYCHOSOMATIC MEDICINE, 1995, 57 (03): : 213 - 225
  • [7] [Anonymous], 2018, HLTH PEOPL 2020
  • [8] [Anonymous], 1990, AMERICANS DISABILITI
  • [9] [Anonymous], 2021, Commission on social determinants of health, 2005-2008
  • [10] [Anonymous], 2010, Disability health data and statistics in the United States