Conversion of teaching file cases from film to digital format: A comparison between use of a diagnostic-quality digitizer and use of a flatbed scanner with transparency adapter

被引:14
作者
Bassignani, MJ
Bubash-Faust, L
Ciambotti, J
Moran, R
Mcllhenny, J
机构
[1] Univ Virginia, Hlth Sci Ctr, Dept Radiol, Charlottesville, VA 22908 USA
[2] Univ Michigan Hlth Syst, Dept Radiol, Ann Arbor, MI USA
关键词
computers; educational aid; education; images; digitization; processing;
D O I
10.1016/S1076-6332(03)80064-8
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Rationale and Objectives. The authors' institution had decided to convert its radiology teaching files from film to digital media. This study was performed to determine the simplest method for converting the analog film images to digital images without a subsequent loss in diagnostic accuracy. Materials and Methods. Twenty chest radiographs that demonstrated interstitial lung disease were randomly selected from the departmental teaching files and matched with 20 control radiographs from healthy adults. Analog film images were converted with both a diagnostic-quality film image digitizer (digitized) and a flatbed scanner equipped with a transparency adapter (scanned). Three radiology faculty members reviewed a mixed set of corresponding analog film, digitized, and scanned images. Reviewers judged whether each image depicted interstitial lung disease, indicated their level of confidence in the diagnosis, and rated each image for quality. Image quality was assessed by each reviewer subjectively at the time of viewing the individual image, without regard to other images. A one-way analysis of variance was performed to determine whether there was a statistically significant difference in diagnostic accuracy between the three image formats. Agreement in diagnosis between corresponding images in the three different formats was evaluated for each reviewer with the McNemar test. Results. There was no statistically significant difference in diagnostic accuracy between analog film and scanned images, but there was such a difference between these two groups and digitized images. Accuracy was 97% for analog film, 94% for scanned, and 89% for digitized images. Results of the McNemar test showed no statistically significant difference in agreement between the analog film images and the scanned images for any of the reviewers (P >.05). Conclusion. A high-end flatbed scanner with transparency adapter provided accurate, simple, and inexpensive conversion of analog film teaching files to digital format, with no loss of the ability to detect or diagnose subtle abnormalities such as interstitial lung disease.
引用
收藏
页码:536 / 542
页数:7
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]  
Apicella P L, 1991, J Digit Imaging, V4, P43
[2]   INTRODUCTION TO THE ACR-NEMA DICOM STANDARD [J].
BIDGOOD, WD ;
HORII, SC .
RADIOGRAPHICS, 1992, 12 (02) :345-355
[3]  
BUBASHFAUST LB, 2001, ANN M SOC HLTH SERV
[4]   Primer on computers and information technology .2. An introduction to computer networking [J].
Channin, DS ;
Chang, PJ .
RADIOGRAPHICS, 1997, 17 (04) :988-992
[5]   Cost-effective poster and print production with digital camera and computer technology [J].
Chen, MYM ;
Ott, DJ ;
Rohde, RP ;
Henson, E ;
Gelfand, DW ;
Boehme, JM .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1997, 169 (04) :955-957
[6]   DIGITIZING OF RADIOGRAPHS WITH A FLAT-BED SCANNER [J].
CHEN, SK ;
HOLLENDER, L .
JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY, 1995, 23 (04) :205-208
[7]  
*EASTM KOD, 1999, LUM 50 75 85 OP REF
[8]   Improving the interactivity and functionality of Web-based radiology teaching files with the Java']Java programming language [J].
Eng, J .
RADIOGRAPHICS, 1997, 17 (06) :1567-1574
[9]  
*EPS AM, 1997, EPS EXPR 836XL US MA
[10]   The megapixel digital camera: Value for creating publication-quality illustrations [J].
Frank, MS ;
Dreyer, KJ ;
Mehta, A .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1999, 173 (04) :883-887