Attribution of climate forcing to economic sectors

被引:195
作者
Unger, Nadine [1 ,2 ]
Bond, Tami C. [3 ]
Wang, James S. [4 ]
Koch, Dorothy M. [1 ,2 ]
Menon, Surabi [5 ]
Shindell, Drew T. [1 ]
Bauer, Susanne [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] NASA, Goddard Inst Space Studies, New York, NY 10025 USA
[2] Columbia Univ, Ctr Climate Syst Res, New York, NY 10025 USA
[3] Univ Illinois, Urbana, IL 61801 USA
[4] Environm Def Fund, New York, NY 10010 USA
[5] Univ Calif Berkeley, Lawrence Berkeley Lab, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
关键词
global warming; mitigation; air pollution; ozone; aerosols; EMISSIONS; AEROSOLS; CARBON; SIMULATIONS; CLOUDS; OZONE; RADIATION; IMPACT; MATTER;
D O I
10.1073/pnas.0906548107
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
A much-cited bar chart provided by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change displays the climate impact, as expressed by radiative forcing in watts per meter squared, of individual chemical species. The organization of the chart reflects the history of atmospheric chemistry, in which investigators typically focused on a single species of interest. However, changes in pollutant emissions and concentrations are a symptom, not a cause, of the primary driver of anthropogenic climate change: human activity. In this paper, we suggest organizing the bar chart according to drivers of change-that is, by economic sector. Climate impacts of tropospheric ozone, fine aerosols, aerosol-cloud interactions, methane, and long-lived greenhouse gases are considered. We quantify the future evolution of the total radiative forcing due to perpetual constant year 2000 emissions by sector, most relevant for the development of climate policy now, and focus on two specific time points, near-term at 2020 and long-term at 2100. Because sector profiles differ greatly, this approach fosters the development of smart climate policy and is useful to identify effective opportunities for rapid mitigation of anthropogenic radiative forcing.
引用
收藏
页码:3382 / 3387
页数:6
相关论文
共 39 条
[11]   Health effects of airborne particulate matter: Do we know enough to consider regulating specific particle types or sources? [J].
Grahame, Thomas J. ;
Schlesinger, Richard B. .
INHALATION TOXICOLOGY, 2007, 19 (6-7) :457-481
[12]   Radiative forcing and climate response [J].
Hansen, J ;
Sato, M ;
Ruedy, R .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 1997, 102 (D6) :6831-6864
[13]  
Hansen J., 2008, Open Atmosphere Science Journal, V2, P217, DOI 10.2174/1874282300802010217
[14]  
Jacobson MZ, 2004, J CLIMATE, V17, P2909, DOI 10.1175/1520-0442(2004)017<2909:TSCBLG>2.0.CO
[15]  
2
[16]   Analysis of aerosol interactions with numerical techniques for solving coagulation, nucleation, condensation, dissolution, and reversible chemistry among multiple size distributions [J].
Jacobson, MZ .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 2002, 107 (D19) :AAC2-1
[17]  
KLOSTER S, 2009, CLIM DYNAM, DOI DOI 10.1007/S00382
[18]   Linking future aerosol radiative forcing to shifts in source activities [J].
Koch, Dorothy ;
Bond, Tami C. ;
Streets, David ;
Unger, Nadine .
GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2007, 34 (05)
[19]   Distinguishing Aerosol Impacts on Climate over the Past Century [J].
Koch, Dorothy ;
Menon, Surabi ;
Del Genio, Anthony ;
Ruedy, Reto ;
Alienov, Igor ;
Schmidt, Gavin A. .
JOURNAL OF CLIMATE, 2009, 22 (10) :2659-2677
[20]   Global model simulations of the impact of ocean-going ships on aerosols, clouds, and the radiation budget [J].
Lauer, A. ;
Eyring, V. ;
Hendricks, J. ;
Joeckel, P. ;
Lohmann, U. .
ATMOSPHERIC CHEMISTRY AND PHYSICS, 2007, 7 (19) :5061-5079