Explosive eversion and functional morphology of the duck penis supports sexual conflict in waterfowl genitalia

被引:82
作者
Brennan, Patricia L. R. [1 ,2 ]
Clark, Christopher J. [1 ,2 ]
Prum, Richard O. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Yale Univ, Dept Ecol & Evolutionary Biol, New Haven, CT 06511 USA
[2] Yale Univ, Peabody Museum Nat Hist, New Haven, CT 06511 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
sexual conflict; penis functional morphology; hydrostatic skeleton; INTROMITTENT ORGAN; FEMALE CHOICE; SELECTION; INSEMINATION; COEVOLUTION; ADAPTATION; EVOLUTION; DESIGNS; SYSTEM;
D O I
10.1098/rspb.2009.2139
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Coevolution of male and female genitalia in waterfowl has been hypothesized to occur through sexual conflict. This hypothesis raises questions about the functional morphology of the waterfowl penis and the mechanics of copulation in waterfowl, which are poorly understood. We used high-speed video of phallus eversion and histology to describe for the first time the functional morphology of the avian penis. Eversion of the 20 cm muscovy duck penis is explosive, taking an average of 0.36 s, and achieving a maximum velocity of 1.6 m s(-1). The collagen matrix of the penis is very thin and not arranged in an axial-orthogonal array, resulting in a penis that is flexible when erect. To test the hypothesis that female genital novelties make intromission difficult during forced copulations, we investigated penile eversion into glass tubes that presented different mechanical challenges to eversion. Eversion occurred successfully in a straight tube and a counterclockwise spiral tube that matched the chirality of the waterfowl penis, but eversion was significantly less successful into glass tubes with a clockwise spiral or a 1358 bend, which mimicked female vaginal geometry. Our results support the hypothesis that duck vaginal complexity functions to exclude the penis during forced copulations, and coevolved with the waterfowl penis via antagonistic sexual conflict.
引用
收藏
页码:1309 / 1314
页数:6
相关论文
共 31 条
  • [1] Antagonistic coevolution between the sexes in a group of insects
    Arnqvist, G
    Rowe, L
    [J]. NATURE, 2002, 415 (6873) : 787 - 789
  • [2] Immunohistochemical analysis of smooth muscle cells and volumetric density of the elastic system fibers of wild boar (Sus scrofa) penis
    Babinski, MA
    deBrito-Gitirana, L
    Chagas, MA
    Abidú-Figueiredo, M
    Costa, WS
    Sampaio, F
    [J]. ANIMAL REPRODUCTION SCIENCE, 2005, 86 (3-4) : 317 - 328
  • [3] Coevolution of Male and Female Genital Morphology in Waterfowl
    Brennan, Patricia L. R.
    Prum, Richard O.
    McCracken, Kevin G.
    Sorenson, Michael D.
    Wilson, Robert E.
    Birkhead, Tim R.
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2007, 2 (05):
  • [4] Sexual selection and the intromittent organ of birds
    Briskie, JV
    Montgomerie, R
    [J]. JOURNAL OF AVIAN BIOLOGY, 1997, 28 (01) : 73 - 86
  • [5] Sexual conflict
    Chapman, T
    Arnqvist, G
    Bangham, J
    Rowe, L
    [J]. TRENDS IN ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION, 2003, 18 (01) : 41 - 47
  • [6] Coker CR, 2002, AUK, V119, P403, DOI 10.1642/0004-8038(2002)119[0403:IOMATS]2.0.CO
  • [7] 2
  • [8] Female choice of sexually antagonistic male adaptations: a critical review of some current research
    Cordero, C
    Eberhard, WG
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY, 2003, 16 (01) : 1 - 6
  • [9] DAVIS J D, 1970, Herpetologica, V26, P238
  • [10] DIVERSITY AND ADAPTATION IN RODENT COPULATORY-BEHAVIOR
    DEWSBURY, DA
    [J]. SCIENCE, 1975, 190 (4218) : 947 - 954