Higher Stage of Disease Is Associated With Bilateral Mastectomy Among Patients With Breast Cancer: A Population-Based Survey

被引:13
作者
Freedman, Rachel A. [1 ]
Kouri, Elena M. [2 ]
West, Dee W. [3 ]
Rosenberg, Shoshana [1 ]
Partridge, Ann H. [1 ]
Lii, Joyce [4 ]
Keating, Nancy L. [2 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Dana Farber Canc Inst, Dept Med Oncol, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[2] Harvard Univ, Sch Med, Dept Hlth Care Policy, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[3] Canc Registry Greater Calif, Inst Publ Hlth, Sacramento, CA USA
[4] Brigham & Womens Hosp, Dept Med, Div Pharmacoepidemiol & Pharmacoecon, 75 Francis St, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[5] Brigham & Womens Hosp, Dept Med, Div Gen Internal Med, 75 Francis St, Boston, MA 02115 USA
关键词
Bilateral mastectomy; Breast cancer; Contralateral prophylactic mastectomy; Reconstruction; Stage; CONTRALATERAL PROPHYLACTIC MASTECTOMY; CARCINOMA-IN-SITU; YOUNG-WOMEN; FOLLOW-UP; SURGICAL-TREATMENT; FAMILY-HISTORY; INCREASING USE; RECONSTRUCTION; SURGERY; TRENDS;
D O I
10.1016/j.clbc.2015.08.004
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
We examined factors that were associated with bilateral mastectomy and reconstruction in a population-based survey. In addition to other previously described factors, having stage III disease (vs. stage 0) was associated with bilateral mastectomy. Given the lack of clear medical benefit for this procedure, our findings highlight the need for interventions to assure women are making informed surgical decisions. Background: The reasons for increasing rates of bilateral mastectomy for unilateral breast cancer are incompletely understood, and associations of disease stage with bilateral surgery have been inconsistent. We examined associations of clinical and sociodemographic factors, including stage, with surgery type and reconstruction receipt among women with breast cancer. Patients and Methods: We surveyed a diverse population-based sample of women from Northern California cancer registries with stage 0 to III breast cancer diagnosed during 2010-2011 (participation rate, 68.5%). Using multinomial logistic regression, we examined factors associated with bilateral and unilateral mastectomy (vs. breast-conserving surgery), adjusting for tumor and sociodemographic characteristics. In a second model, we examined factors associated with reconstruction for mastectomy-treated patients. Results: Among 487 participants, 58% had breast-conserving surgery, 32% had unilateral mastectomy, and 10% underwent bilateral mastectomy. In adjusted analyses, women with stage III (vs. stage 0) cancers had higher odds of bilateral mastectomy (odds ratio [OR], 8.28; 95% confidence interval, 2.32-29.50); women with stage II and III (vs. stage 0) disease had higher odds of unilateral mastectomy. Higher (vs. lower) income was also associated with bilateral mastectomy, while age >= 60 years (vs. < 50 years) was associated with lower odds of bilateral surgery. Among mastectomy-treated patients (n = 206), bilateral mastectomy, unmarried status, and higher education and income were all associated with reconstruction (P < .05). Conclusion: In this population-based cohort, women with the greatest risk of distant recurrence were most likely to undergo bilateral mastectomy despite a lack of clear medical benefit, raising concern for overtreatment. Our findings highlight the need for interventions to assure women are making informed surgical decisions. (C) 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:105 / 112
页数:8
相关论文
共 51 条
  • [1] American Association for Public Opinion Research, RESP RAT OV
  • [2] [Anonymous], 1990, J NATL CANC I MONOGR, P1
  • [3] [Anonymous], 1998, ONCOLOGY WILLISTON P, V12, P668
  • [4] Conservative treatment versus mastectomy in early breast cancer: Patterns of failure with 15 years of follow-up data
    Arriagada, R
    Le, MG
    Rochard, F
    Contesso, G
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1996, 14 (05) : 1558 - 1564
  • [5] Patient and Surgeon Characteristics Associated with Increased Use of Contralateral Prophylactic Mastectomy in Patients with Breast Cancer
    Arrington, Amanda K.
    Jarosek, Stephanie L.
    Virnig, Beth A.
    Habermann, Elizabeth B.
    Tuttle, Todd M.
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2009, 16 (10) : 2697 - 2704
  • [6] Impact of Breast Reconstruction on the Decision to Undergo Contralateral Prophylactic Mastectomy
    Ashfaq, Awais
    McGhan, Lee J.
    Pockaj, Barbara A.
    Gray, Richard J.
    Bagaria, Sanjay P.
    McLaughlin, Sarah A.
    Casey, William J., III
    Rebecca, Alanna M.
    Kreymerman, Peter
    Wasif, Nabil
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2014, 21 (09) : 2934 - 2940
  • [7] Understanding cancer treatment and outcomes: The Cancer Care Outcomes Research and Surveillance Consortium
    Ayanian, JZ
    Chrischilles, EA
    Wallace, RB
    Fletcher, RH
    Fouad, MN
    Kiefe, CI
    Harrington, DP
    Weeks, JC
    Kahn, KL
    Malin, JL
    Lipscomb, J
    Potosky, AL
    Provenzale, DT
    Sandler, RS
    van Ryn, M
    West, DW
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2004, 22 (15) : 2992 - 2996
  • [8] Current Knowledge on Contralateral Prophylactic Mastectomy Among Women with Sporadic Breast Cancer
    Brewster, Abenaa M.
    Parker, Patricia A.
    [J]. ONCOLOGIST, 2011, 16 (07) : 935 - 941
  • [9] Validation of screening questions for limited health literacy in a large VA outpatient population
    Chew, Lisa D.
    Griffin, Joan M.
    Partin, Melissa R.
    Noorbaloochi, Siamak
    Grill, Joseph P.
    Snyder, Annamay
    Bradley, Katharine A.
    Nugent, Sean M.
    Baines, Alisha D.
    VanRyn, Michelle
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2008, 23 (05) : 561 - 566
  • [10] A multi-institutional analysis of the socioeconomic determinants of breast reconstruction - A study of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network
    Christian, CK
    Niland, J
    Edge, SB
    Ottesen, RA
    Hughes, ME
    Theriault, R
    Wilson, J
    Hergrueter, CA
    Weeks, JC
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2006, 243 (02) : 241 - 249