Primary percutaneous coronary intervention compared with fibrinolysis for myocardial infarction in diabetes mellitus - Results from the primary coronary angioplasty vs thrombolysis-2 trial

被引:67
作者
Timmer, Jorik R.
Ottervanger, Jan Paul
de Boer, Menko-Jan
Boersma, Eric
Grines, Cindy L.
Westerhout, Cynthia M.
Simes, John
Granger, Christopher B.
Zijlstra, Felix
机构
[1] Isala Klin, Dept Cardiol, NL-8011 JW Zwolle, Netherlands
[2] Erasmus MC, Clin Epidemiol Unit, Thoraxctr, Rotterdam, Netherlands
[3] William Beaumont Hosp, Royal Oak, MI 48072 USA
[4] Univ Alberta, Dept Med, Edmonton, AB, Canada
[5] Univ Sydney, Natl Hlth & Med Res Counsel, Clin Trials Ctr, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
[6] Duke Clin Res Inst, Durham, NC USA
[7] Univ Groningen, Med Ctr, Thoraxctr, Dept Cardiol, Groningen, Netherlands
关键词
D O I
10.1001/archinte.167.13.1353
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: There is growing evidence for a clinical benefit of primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) compared with fibrinolysis; however, whether the treatment effect is consistent among patients with diabetes mellitus is unclear. We compared PCI with fibrinolysis for treatment of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction in patients with diabetes mellitus. Methods: A pooled analysis of individual patient data from 19 trials comparing primary PCI with fibrinolysis for treatment of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction was performed. Trials that enrolled at least 50 patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and randomized patients to receive either primary PCI or fibrinolysis were considered for inclusion in our study. Clinical end points were total deaths, recurrent infarction, death or nonfatal recurrent infarction, and stroke, measured 30 days after randomization. Results: Of 6315 patients, 877 (14%) had diabetes. Thirty-day mortality (9.4% vs 5.9%; P < .001) was higher in patients with diabetes. Mortality was lower after primary PCI compared with fibrinolysis in both patients with diabetes (unadjusted odds ratio, 0.49; 95% confidence interval, 0.31-0.79; P = .004) and without diabetes (unadjusted odds ratio, 0.69; 95% confidence interval, 0.54-0.86, P = .001), with no evidence of heterogeneity of treatment effect (P = .24 for interaction). Recurrent infarction and stroke were also reduced after primary PCI in both patient groups. After multivariable analysis, primary PCI was associated with decreased 30-day mortality in patients with and without diabetes, with a point estimate of greater benefit in diabetic patients. Conclusions: Diabetic patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction treated with reperfusion therapy have increased mortality compared with patients without diabetes. The beneficial effects of primary PCI compared with fibrinolysis in diabetic patients are consistent with effects in nondiabetic patients.
引用
收藏
页码:1353 / 1359
页数:7
相关论文
共 56 条
[1]   Tissue-type plasminogen activator therapy versus primary coronary angioplasty: Impact on myocardial tissue perfusion and regional function 1 month after uncomplicated myocardial infarction [J].
Agati, L ;
Voci, P ;
Hickle, P ;
Vizza, DC ;
Autore, C ;
Fedele, F ;
Feinstein, SB ;
Dagianti, A .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 1998, 31 (02) :338-343
[2]  
Akhras F., 1997, Journal of the American College of Cardiology, V29, p235A
[3]   A comparison of coronary angioplasty with fibrinolytic therapy in acute myocardial infarction [J].
Andersen, HR ;
Nielsen, TT ;
Rasmussen, K ;
Thuesen, L ;
Kelbaek, H ;
Thayssen, P ;
Abildgaard, U ;
Pedersen, F ;
Madsen, JK ;
Grande, P ;
Villadsen, AB ;
Krusell, LR ;
Haghfelt, T ;
Lomholt, P ;
Husted, SE ;
Vigholt, E ;
Kjaergard, HK ;
Mortensen, LS .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2003, 349 (08) :733-742
[4]   Impact of diabetes mellitus on epicardial and microvascular flow after fibrinolytic therapy [J].
Angeja, BG ;
de Lemos, J ;
Murphy, SA ;
Marble, SJ ;
Antman, EM ;
Cannon, CP ;
Braunwald, E ;
Gibson, CM .
AMERICAN HEART JOURNAL, 2002, 144 (04) :649-656
[5]  
Aoki H, 1997, CIRCULATION, V96, P3003
[6]   Thrombolytic therapy vs primary percutaneous coronary intervention for myocardial infarction in patients presenting to hospitals without on-site cardiac surgery - A randomized controlled trial [J].
Aversano, T ;
Aversano, LT ;
Passamani, E ;
Knatterud, GL ;
Terrin, ML ;
Williams, DO ;
Forman, SA .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2002, 287 (15) :1943-1951
[7]  
Aversano T, 2002, JAMA-J AM MED ASSOC, V287, P3212
[8]  
Betriu A, 1997, NEW ENGL J MED, V336, P1621
[9]  
Betriu A, 1997, NEW ENGL J MED, V337, P287
[10]   Does time matter? A pooled analysis of randomized clinical trials comparing primary percutaneous coronary intervention and in-hospital fibrinolysis in acute myocardial infarction patients [J].
Boersma, E .
EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2006, 27 (07) :779-788