Validation of a comorbidity index for use in obstetric patients: A nationwide cohort study

被引:21
作者
Bliddal, Mette [1 ,2 ]
Moller, Soren [1 ,2 ]
Vinter, Christina A. [1 ,3 ]
Rubin, Katrine H. [1 ,2 ]
Gagne, Joshua J. [4 ,5 ]
Pottegard, Anton [6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Southern Denmark, Dept Clin Res, Odense, Denmark
[2] Odense Univ Hosp, OPEN Open Patient Data Explorat Network, JB Winslow Vej 9a, DK-5000 Odense C, Denmark
[3] Odense Univ Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Odense, Denmark
[4] Brigham & Womens Hosp, Dept Med, Div Pharmacoepidemiol & Pharmacoecon, 75 Francis St, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[5] Harvard Med Sch, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[6] Univ Southern Denmark, Dept Publ Hlth, Clin Pharmacol, Odense, Denmark
关键词
adverse maternal outcomes; comorbidity; obstetric comorbidity index; prediction; reproduction; validation; DANISH; DIAGNOSES; REGISTRY; RISK;
D O I
10.1111/aogs.13749
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Introduction A previously developed Obstetric Comorbidity Index has been validated in highly selected cohorts. Validation of the index in an unselected population as well as in other health registers is, however, of high importance to determine external validity. Material and methods Using nationwide registers, we formed a nationwide cohort including completed pregnancies (both live- and stillborn) in Denmark from 2000 through 2014. Maternal age and 20 comorbid conditions were assessed and weighted. Outcomes were maternal end-organ injury or death within 30 days postpartum. The index's predictive and discriminative ability was estimated by Brier score and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), respectively. Logistic regression analysis was used to estimate odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence interval (CI). Results In 876 496 completed pregnancies by 527 079 women, 1.40% (n = 12 314) experienced an outcome. The majority of women (64.1%) did not have any record of a condition included in the index and only 0.3% (n = 3044) had a score >6. The incidence of an outcome increased with increasing comorbidity score from 0.9% (95% CI 0.8-0.9) in women scoring 0% to 10.4% (95% CI 7.6-13.9) in women scoring 9-10. Compared with women scoring 0, a score of 1-2 yielded an OR of 2.34 (95% CI 2.25-2.44), 3-4 an OR of 5.16 (95% CI 4.81-5.54), 5-6 an OR of 4.84 (95% CI 4.31-5.44), and 8-9 an OR of 7.97 (95% CI 6.54-9.72) for experiencing the outcome. The index had a Brier score of 0.01 and an AUC of 0.64. Conclusions Despite potential weaknesses in the outcome definition, the Obstetric Comorbidity Index showed a moderate ability to discriminate and predict end-organ injury and death in a nationwide cohort in Denmark, in accordance with previous findings. These results suggest that the index may be a useful tool to control for confounding in health research and clinically to identify women at high risk for adverse maternal outcomes.
引用
收藏
页码:399 / 405
页数:7
相关论文
共 19 条
  • [1] Development of a Comorbidity Index for Use in Obstetric Patients
    不详
    [J]. OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2013, 122 (05) : 957 - 965
  • [2] Measurement properties of comorbidity indices in maternal health research: a systematic review
    Aoyama, Kazuyoshi
    D'Souza, Rohan
    Inada, Eiichi
    Lapinsky, Stephen E.
    Fowler, Robert A.
    [J]. BMC PREGNANCY AND CHILDBIRTH, 2017, 17
  • [3] The Obstetric Comorbidity Index predicts severe maternal morbidity
    Bateman, B. T.
    Gagne, J. J.
    [J]. BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2015, 122 (13) : 1756 - 1756
  • [4] The Danish Medical Birth Register
    Bliddal, Mette
    Broe, Anne
    Pottegard, Anton
    Olsen, Jorn
    Langhoff-Roos, Jens
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2018, 33 (01) : 27 - 36
  • [5] Advances in Measuring the Effect of Individual Predictors of Cardiovascular Risk: The Role of Reclassification Measures
    Cook, Nancy R.
    Ridker, Paul M.
    [J]. ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2009, 150 (11) : 795 - W143
  • [6] Putting the "M" back in maternal-fetal medicine
    D'Alton, Mary E.
    Bonanno, Clarissa A.
    Berkowitz, Richard L.
    Brown, Haywood L.
    Copel, Joshua A.
    Cunningham, F. Gary
    Garite, Thomas J.
    Gilstrap, Larry C., III
    Grobman, William A.
    Hankins, Gary D. V.
    Hauth, John C.
    Iriye, Brian K.
    Macones, George A.
    Martin, James N., Jr.
    Martin, Stephanie R.
    Menard, Kathryn
    O'Keefe, Daniel F.
    Pacheco, Luis D.
    Riley, Laura E.
    Saade, George R.
    Spong, Catherine Y.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2013, 208 (06) : 442 - 448
  • [7] The performance of risk prediction models
    Gerds, Thomas A.
    Cai, Tianxi
    Schumacher, Martin
    [J]. BIOMETRICAL JOURNAL, 2008, 50 (04) : 457 - 479
  • [8] Diversity and divergence: the dynamic burden of poor maternal health
    Graham, Wendy
    Woodd, Susannah
    Byass, Peter
    Filippi, Veronique
    Gon, Giorgia
    Virgo, Sandra
    Chou, Doris
    Hounton, Sennen
    Lozano, Rafael
    Pattinson, Robert
    Singh, Susheela
    [J]. LANCET, 2016, 388 (10056) : 2164 - 2175
  • [9] Validity of preeclampsia-related diagnoses recorded in a national hospital registry and in a postpartum interview of the women
    Klemmensen, Ase K.
    Olsen, Sjurdur F.
    Osterdal, Marie Louise
    Tabor, Ann
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2007, 166 (02) : 117 - 124
  • [10] Validation of the Danish birth registration
    Kristensen, J
    LanghoffRoos, J
    Skovgaard, LT
    Kristensen, FB
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1996, 49 (08) : 893 - 897