Is utility maximization compromised by acute intoxication with THC or MDMA?

被引:1
作者
Bedi, Gillinder [1 ,2 ]
Burghart, Daniel R. [3 ]
机构
[1] Orygen, Natl Ctr Excellence Youth Mental Hlth, 35 Poplar Rd, Parkville, Vic 3052, Australia
[2] Univ Melbourne, 35 Poplar Rd, Parkville, Vic 3052, Australia
[3] Calif State Univ Sacramento, Dept Econ, 6000 J St, Sacramento, CA 95819 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Rationality; Utility maximization; GARP; THC; MDMA; DECISION-MAKING; MARIJUANA; PREFERENCE; USERS; TASK;
D O I
10.1016/j.econlet.2018.06.021
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This report presents results from a within-subject, randomized, placebo-controlled experiment in which healthy participants were orally administered delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC; 10mg/70kg), the main psychoactive component of cannabis, 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA; 1.5mg/70kg), the main psychoactive component of 'ecstasy' and 'molly', and placebo across three sessions. While intoxicated, participants chose between monetary payment and social time, defined as access to their phone and pre-specified social internet sites like Facebook. The design of the experiment made possible an assessment of the acute effects of THC and MDMA on adherence to the generalized axiom of revealed preference (GARP), a necessary and sufficient condition for maximization of a well-behaved utility function. Choices made under the influence of THC, MDMA, and placebo were all GARP compliant. Thus, even when participants were acutely intoxicated with THC or MDMA, their choices remained consistent with the tenets of neoclassical choice theory. (C) 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:128 / 132
页数:5
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]  
Afriat S. N., 1973, International Economic Review, V14, P460, DOI DOI 10.2307/2525934
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2004, DIAGN STAT MAN MENT
[3]   Subjective, cognitive and cardiovascular dose-effect profile of nabilone and dronabinol in marijuana smokers [J].
Bedi, Gillinder ;
Cooper, Ziva D. ;
Haney, Margaret .
ADDICTION BIOLOGY, 2013, 18 (05) :872-881
[4]   Is Ecstasy an "Empathogen"? Effects of ±3,4-Methylenedioxymethamphetamine on Prosocial Feelings and Identification of Emotional States in Others [J].
Bedi, Gillinder ;
Hyman, David ;
de Wit, Harriet .
BIOLOGICAL PSYCHIATRY, 2010, 68 (12) :1134-1140
[5]   Effects of MDMA on sociability and neural response to social threat and social reward [J].
Bedi, Gillinder ;
Phan, K. Luan ;
Angstadt, Mike ;
de Wit, Harriet .
PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2009, 207 (01) :73-83
[6]   THE POWER OF NONPARAMETRIC-TESTS OF PREFERENCE MAXIMIZATION [J].
BRONARS, SG .
ECONOMETRICA, 1987, 55 (03) :693-698
[7]   An expected utility maximizer walks into a bar... [J].
Burghart, Daniel R. ;
Glimcher, Paul W. ;
Lazzaro, Stephanie C. .
JOURNAL OF RISK AND UNCERTAINTY, 2013, 46 (03) :215-246
[8]   Ventromedial Frontal Lobe Damage Disrupts Value Maximization in Humans [J].
Camille, Nathalie ;
Griffiths, Cathryn A. ;
Vo, Khoi ;
Fellows, Lesley K. ;
Kable, Joseph W. .
JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE, 2011, 31 (20) :7527-7532
[9]   Testing data for consistency with revealed preference [J].
Gross, J .
REVIEW OF ECONOMICS AND STATISTICS, 1995, 77 (04) :701-710
[10]   GARP for kids: On the development of rational choice behavior [J].
Harbaugh, WT ;
Krause, K ;
Berry, TR .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2001, 91 (05) :1539-1545