Model Performance Indicator of Aging Pipes in a Domestic Water Supply Distribution Network

被引:13
作者
Abd Rahman, Norzaura [1 ,2 ]
Muhammad, Nur Shazwani [1 ]
Abdullah, Jazuri [3 ]
Mohtar, Wan Hanna Melini Wan [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Kebangsaan Malaysia, Fac Engn & Built Environm, Smart & Sustainable Township Res Ctr SUTRA, Bangi 43600, Selangor, Malaysia
[2] Univ Pertahanan Nasl Malaysia, Ctr Def Fdn Studies, Dept Math, Kuala Lumpur 57000, Malaysia
[3] Univ Teknol MARA, Fac Civil Engn, Shah Alam 40450, Selangor, Malaysia
关键词
EPANET; aging pipes; water distribution network; non-revenue water; performance indicator; model accuracy; LONGITUDINAL DISPERSION COEFFICIENT; CALIBRATION; INDEX;
D O I
10.3390/w11112378
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Aging pipes in the domestic water distribution network have the potential to decrease the quality and quantity of the treated water supplied to the consumers. Therefore, a calibrated water distribution model is helpful to monitor and understand the behaviour of a real water distribution network. However, a comprehensive performance indicator and an integrated method to assess the efficiency of model performance have not been well established in the literature. This study developed a methodology for a model calibration exercise, with consideration of two uncertainty parameters, i.e., Hazen-Williams roughness coefficient of the pipes and Non-Revenue Water (NRW) in each nodal demand. Following this, a statistical color-coded performance indicator was established, based on the Nash-Sutcliffe Efficiency Coefficient (NSEC), the coefficient of determination (R-2), the correlation coefficient (r), and the Mean Absolute Error (MAE). The accuracy of the calibrated model was measured by Discrepancy Ratio (DR) analysis. This study concluded that the model performed well when NRW was added to the nodal demand in zone(s) with suspected water loss activities. The suggested Hazen-Williams roughness coefficient for PVC pipes was between 130 and 140 for pipes aged more than 20 years. The threshold error value to determine the accuracy of the simulated model was proposed to be between -0.05 and 0.05.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 44 条
[21]  
Lambert A., 2000, IWA the Blue Pages, P1
[22]   Evaluating the use of "goodness-of-fit" measures in hydrologic and hydroclimatic model validation [J].
Legates, DR ;
McCabe, GJ .
WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 1999, 35 (01) :233-241
[23]  
Malaysian Water Association, 1994, MWA DES GUID WAT SUP
[24]  
Marzouk Mohamed, 2015, HBRC Journal, V11, P114, DOI 10.1016/j.hbrcj.2014.03.002
[25]   Distribution Network Assessment using EPANET for Intermittent and Continuous Water Supply [J].
Mohapatra, Sanjeeb ;
Sargaonkar, Aabha ;
Labhasetwar, Pawan Kumar .
WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT, 2014, 28 (11) :3745-3759
[26]   Model evaluation guidelines for systematic quantification of accuracy in watershed simulations [J].
Moriasi, D. N. ;
Arnold, J. G. ;
Van Liew, M. W. ;
Bingner, R. L. ;
Harmel, R. D. ;
Veith, T. L. .
TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASABE, 2007, 50 (03) :885-900
[27]  
Nash JE., 1970, J HYDROL, V10, P282, DOI DOI 10.1016/0022-1694(70)90255-6
[28]  
National Water Service Commission, NONR WAT YEAR 2016 2
[29]  
Oyelowo A.E. A., 2013, Journal of Engineering Research, V18, P69
[30]   A critical review of statistical calibration/prediction models handling data inconsistency and model inadequacy [J].
Pernot, Pascal ;
Cailliez, Fabien .
AICHE JOURNAL, 2017, 63 (10) :4642-4665