Sexual dimorphism and natural variation within and among species in the Drosophila retinal mosaic

被引:25
作者
Hilbrant, Maarten [1 ]
Almudi, Isabel [1 ]
Leite, Daniel J. [1 ]
Kuncheria, Linta [1 ]
Posnien, Nico [2 ]
Nunes, Maria D. S. [1 ]
McGregor, Alistair P. [1 ]
机构
[1] Oxford Brookes Univ, Dept Biol & Med Sci, Oxford OX3 0BP, England
[2] Univ Gottingen, Johann Friedrich Blumenbach Inst Zool & Anthropol, Dept Dev Biol, D-37077 Gottingen, Germany
基金
欧洲研究理事会;
关键词
Sexual dimorphism; Insect vision; Eye morphology; Evolution; Rhodopsins; Drosophila; PHOTORECEPTOR CELLS; COMPOUND EYE; MELANOGASTER; SIMULANS; EXPRESSION; AFRICAN; COLOR; GENE; ORGANIZATION; POPULATIONS;
D O I
10.1186/s12862-014-0240-x
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Background: Insect compound eyes are composed of ommatidia, which contain photoreceptor cells that are sensitive to different wavelengths of light defined by the specific rhodopsin proteins that they express. The fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster has several different ommatidium types that can be localised to specific retinal regions, such as the dorsal rim area (DRA), or distributed stochastically in a mosaic across the retina, like the 'pale' and 'yellow' types. Variation in these ommatidia patterns very likely has important implications for the vision of insects and could underlie behavioural and environmental adaptations. However, despite the detailed understanding of ommatidia specification in D. melanogaster, the extent to which the frequency and distribution of the different ommatidium types vary between sexes, strains and species of Drosophila is not known. Results: We investigated the frequency and distribution of ommatidium types based on rhodopsin protein expression, and the expression levels of rhodopsin transcripts in the eyes of both sexes of different strains of D. melanogaster, D. simulans and D. mauritiana. We found that while the number of DRA ommatidia was invariant, Rh3 expressing ommatidia were more frequent in the larger eyes of females compared to the males of all species analysed. The frequency and distribution of ommatidium types also differed between strains and species. The D. simulans strain ZOM4 has the highest frequency of Rh3 expressing ommatidia, which is associated with a non-stochastic patch of pale and odd-coupled ommatidia in the dorsal-posterior of their eyes. Conclusions: Our results show that there is striking variation in the frequency and distribution of ommatidium types between sexes, strains and species of Drosophila. This suggests that evolutionary changes in the underlying regulatory mechanisms can alter the distribution of ommatidium types to promote or restrict their expression in specific regions of the eye within and between species, and that this could cause differences in vision among these flies.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 56 条
[1]   Global signatures of protein and mRNA expression levels [J].
Abreu, Raquel de Sousa ;
Penalva, Luiz O. ;
Marcotte, Edward M. ;
Vogel, Christine .
MOLECULAR BIOSYSTEMS, 2009, 5 (12) :1512-1526
[2]   Genetic and developmental analysis of differences in eye and face morphology between Drosophila simulans and Drosophila mauritiana [J].
Arif, Saad ;
Hilbrant, Maarten ;
Hopfen, Corinna ;
Almudi, Isabel ;
Nunes, Maria D. S. ;
Posnien, Nico ;
Kuncheria, Linta ;
Tanaka, Kentaro ;
Mitteroecker, Philipp ;
Schloetterer, Christian ;
McGregor, Alistair P. .
EVOLUTION & DEVELOPMENT, 2013, 15 (04) :257-267
[3]   spatstat: An R package for analyzing spatial point patterns [J].
Baddeley, A ;
Turner, R .
JOURNAL OF STATISTICAL SOFTWARE, 2005, 12 (06) :1-42
[4]  
Ballard JWO, 2004, MOL BIOL EVOL, V21, P428, DOI 10.1093/molbev/msh028
[5]  
Bates D., lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using Eigen and S4
[6]   AFRICAN AND NORTH-AMERICAN POPULATIONS OF DROSOPHILA-MELANOGASTER ARE VERY DIFFERENT AT THE DNA LEVEL [J].
BEGUN, DJ ;
AQUADRO, CF .
NATURE, 1993, 365 (6446) :548-550
[7]   Two types of Drosophila R7 photoreceptor cells are arranged randomly:: A model for stochastic cell-fate determination [J].
Bell, Melanie L. ;
Earl, James B. ;
Britt, Steven G. .
JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE NEUROLOGY, 2007, 502 (01) :75-85
[8]  
Bivand R., 2013, Applied Spatial Data Analysis with R, Vsecond, DOI 10.1007/978-1-4614-7618-4
[9]  
Bivand R., SPDEP SPATIAL DEPEND
[10]  
Carleton KL, 2011, METHODS MOL BIOL, V772, P279, DOI 10.1007/978-1-61779-228-1_17