Effect of Pain Neuroscience Education Combined With Cognition-Targeted Motor Control Training on Chronic Spinal Pain A Randomized Clinical Trial

被引:198
作者
Malfliet, Anneleen [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Kregel, Jeroen [3 ,5 ]
Coppieters, Iris [3 ,5 ]
De Pauw, Robby [5 ]
Meeus, Mira [3 ,5 ,6 ]
Roussel, Nathalie [6 ]
Cagnie, Barbara [5 ]
Danneels, Lieven [5 ]
Nijs, Jo [1 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Vrije Univ Brussel, Dept Physiotherapy Human Physiol & Anat, Fac Phys Educ & Physiotherapy, Brussels Hlth Campus,Bldg F Kine,Laarbeeklaan 103, BE-1090 Brussels, Jette, Belgium
[2] Res Fdn Flanders, Brussels, Belgium
[3] Pain Mot Int Res Grp, Brussels, Belgium
[4] Univ Hosp Brussels, Dept Phys Med & Physiotherapy, Brussels, Belgium
[5] Univ Ghent, Dept Rehabil Sci & Physiotherapy, Fac Med & Hlth Sci, Campus Heymans, Ghent, Belgium
[6] Univ Antwerp, Fac Med & Hlth Sci, Dept Rehabil Sci & Physiotherapy, Campus Drie Eiken, Antwerp, Belgium
关键词
LOW-BACK-PAIN; CENTRAL SENSITIZATION; CHRONIC WHIPLASH; TAMPA SCALE; GRAY-MATTER; MODULATION; DISABILITY; BRAIN; HYPERSENSITIVITY; RESPONSIVENESS;
D O I
10.1001/jamaneurol.2018.0492
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
IMPORTANCE Effective treatments for chronic spinal pain are essential to reduce the related high personal and socioeconomic costs. OBJECTIVE To compare pain neuroscience education combined with cognition-targeted motor control training with current best-evidence physiotherapy for reducing pain and improving functionality, gray matter morphologic features, and pain cognitions in individuals with chronic spinal pain. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Multicenter randomized clinical trial conducted from January 1, 2014, to January 30, 2017, among 120 patients with chronic nonspecific spinal pain in 2 outpatient hospitals with follow-up at 3, 6, and 12 months. INTERVENTIONS Participants were randomized into an experimental group (combined pain neuroscience education and cognition-targeted motor control training) and a control group (combining education on back and neck pain and general exercise therapy). MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Primary outcomes were pain (pressure pain thresholds, numeric rating scale, and central sensitization inventory) and function (pain disability index and mental health and physical health). RESULTS There were 22 men and 38 women in the experimental group (mean [SD] age, 39.9 [12.0] years) and 25 men and 35 women in the control group (mean [SD] age, 40.5 [12.9] years). Participants in the experimental group experienced reduced pain (small to medium effect sizes): higher pressure pain thresholds at primary test site at 3 months (estimated marginal [EM] mean, 0.971; 95% CI, -0.028 to 1.970) and reduced central sensitization inventory scores at 6 months (EM mean, -5.684; 95% CI, -10.589 to -0.780) and 12 months (EM mean, -6.053; 95% CI, -10.781 to -1.324). They also experienced improved function (small to medium effect sizes): significant and clinically relevant reduction of disability at 3 months (EM mean, -5.113; 95% CI, -9.994 to -0.232), 6 months (EM mean, -6.351; 95% CI, -11.153 to -1.550), and 12 months (EM mean, -5.779; 95% CI, -10.340 to -1.217); better mental health at 6 months (EM mean, 36.496; 95% CI, 7.998-64.995); and better physical health at 3 months (EM mean, 39.263; 95% CI, 9.644-66.882), 6 months (EM mean, 53.007; 95% CI, 23.805-82.209), and 12 months (EM mean, 32.208; 95% CI, 2.402-62.014). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Pain neuroscience education combined with cognition-targeted motor control training appears to be more effective than current best-evidence physiotherapy for improving pain, symptoms of central sensitization, disability, mental and physical functioning, and pain cognitions in individuals with chronic spinal pain. Significant clinical improvements without detectable changes in brain gray matter morphologic features calls into question the relevance of brain gray matter alterations in this population.
引用
收藏
页码:808 / 817
页数:10
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]   Translation, validation, and norming of the Dutch language version of the SF-36 Health Survey in community and chronic disease populations [J].
Aaronson, NK ;
Muller, M ;
Cohen, PDA ;
Essink-Bot, ML ;
Fekkes, M ;
Sanderman, R ;
Sprangers, MAG ;
Velde, AT ;
Verrips, E .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1998, 51 (11) :1055-1068
[2]  
Butler D., 2003, EXPLAIN PAIN, V1
[3]   Central sensitization and changes in conditioned pain modulation in people with chronic nonspecific low back pain: a case-control study [J].
Correa, Juliana Barbosa ;
Pena Costa, Leonardo Oliveira ;
Bastos de Oliveira, Naiane Teixeira ;
Sluka, Kathleen A. ;
Liebano, Richard Eloin .
EXPERIMENTAL BRAIN RESEARCH, 2015, 233 (08) :2391-2399
[4]   Pain-related fear is more disabling than pain itself: evidence on the role of pain-related fear in chronic back pain disability [J].
Crombez, G ;
Vlaeyen, JWS ;
Heuts, PHTG ;
Lysens, R .
PAIN, 1999, 80 (1-2) :329-339
[5]   An automated labeling system for subdividing the human cerebral cortex on MRI scans into gyral based regions of interest [J].
Desikan, Rahul S. ;
Segonne, Florent ;
Fischl, Bruce ;
Quinn, Brian T. ;
Dickerson, Bradford C. ;
Blacker, Deborah ;
Buckner, Randy L. ;
Dale, Anders M. ;
Maguire, R. Paul ;
Hyman, Bradley T. ;
Albert, Marilyn S. ;
Killiany, Ronald J. .
NEUROIMAGE, 2006, 31 (03) :968-980
[6]   Efficacy of a modern neuroscience approach versus usual care evidence-based physiotherapy on pain, disability and brain characteristics in chronic spinal pain patients: protocol of a randomized clinical trial [J].
Dolphens, Mieke ;
Nijs, Jo ;
Cagnie, Barbara ;
Meeus, Mira ;
Roussel, Nathalie ;
Kregel, Jeroen ;
Malfliet, Anneleen ;
Vanderstraeten, Guy ;
Danneels, Lieven .
BMC MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS, 2014, 15
[7]   Validity, reliability, and clinical importance of change in a 0-10 numeric rating scale measure of spasticity: A post hoc analysis of a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial [J].
Farrar, John T. ;
Troxel, Andrea B. ;
Stott, Colin ;
Duncombe, Paul ;
Jensen, Mark P. .
CLINICAL THERAPEUTICS, 2008, 30 (05) :974-985
[8]  
Fischer A.A., 1990, Journal of Managed Care Medicine, V5, P145
[9]   Whole brain segmentation: Automated labeling of neuroanatomical structures in the human brain [J].
Fischl, B ;
Salat, DH ;
Busa, E ;
Albert, M ;
Dieterich, M ;
Haselgrove, C ;
van der Kouwe, A ;
Killiany, R ;
Kennedy, D ;
Klaveness, S ;
Montillo, A ;
Makris, N ;
Rosen, B ;
Dale, AM .
NEURON, 2002, 33 (03) :341-355
[10]  
Glomsrod B, 2001, J REHABIL MED, V33, P26