Weightbearing ankle dorsiflexion range of motion and sagittal plane kinematics during single leg drop jump landing in healthy male athletes

被引:17
作者
Dowling, Brittany [1 ]
Mcpherson, April L. [2 ]
Paci, James M. [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Motus Global, 200 Sunrise Highway, Rockville Ctr, NY 11570 USA
[2] Mayo Clin, Grad Sch Biomed Sci, Rochester, MN USA
[3] SUNY Stony Brook, Sch Med, Dept Orthoped, Stony Brook, NY 11794 USA
关键词
Ankle joint; Lower extremity; Range of motion; articular; Simmetry; limb-dominance; LOWER-EXTREMITY KINEMATICS; STEP-DOWN TEST; VERTICAL JUMP; KNEE; BIOMECHANICS; STIFFNESS; KINETICS; INJURY; RISK; ASSOCIATION;
D O I
10.23736/S0022-4707.17.07348-0
中图分类号
G8 [体育];
学科分类号
04 ; 0403 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND: Passive ankle dorsiflexion range of motion (DROM) measures have been identified as a risk factor for injury during landings. However, passive measurements might not be indicative of dynamic ankle movement, whereas a weightbearing ROM might be a better tool when evaluating movement. The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between weightbearing DROM and sagittal plane landing mechanics in a single leg drop jump task. METHODS: Seventy-three male athletes (22.1 +/- 3.9 years old, height 186.2 +/- 11 cm, and weight 100.2 +/- 21.8 kg) performed bilateral modified-lunge tasks and bilateral single leg drop jump landings while 3D kinematic data were collected. Hip, knee, and ankle joint angles were calculated at initial contact (IC) maximum knee flexion (MKF), and total excursion (TE) during a single leg drop jump landing. RESULTS: No bilateral differences in DROM and single leg landing mechanics existed. Decreased ankle DROM was correlated to decreased ankle dorsiflexion at MKF (P=0.00) and TE (P=0.00) for both dominant and non-dominant limbs. Decreased ankle DROM was also correlated to decreased knee flexion at IC (P=0.00), MKF (P=0.00), and TE (P=0.1), for both dominant and non-dominant limbs. Ankle DROM correlated to hip flexion at MKF (r=0.25) and TE (r=0.30) in the dominant limb. CONCLUSIONS: Restrictions in DROM may contribute to a stiff landing with less flexion at the ankle and knee. These findings may be useful in designing training programs aimed at increasing DROM in order to improve an athlete's landing mechanics and decrease risk of injury.
引用
收藏
页码:867 / 874
页数:8
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]  
Aerts I, 2013, J SPORT MED PHYS FIT, V53, P509
[2]  
Ambegaonkar J, 2014, BRIT J SPORT MED, V48, P561, DOI DOI 10.1136/bjsports-2014-093494.5
[3]   Impact differences in ground reaction force and center of mass between the first and second landing phases of a drop vertical jump and their implications for injury risk assessment [J].
Bates, Nathaniel A. ;
Ford, Kevin R. ;
Myer, Gregory D. ;
Hewett, Timothy E. .
JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICS, 2013, 46 (07) :1237-1241
[4]   Ankle Dorsiflexion Displacement During Landing is Associated With Initial Contact Kinematics but not Joint Displacement [J].
Begalle, Rebecca L. ;
Walsh, Meghan C. ;
McGrath, Melanie L. ;
Boling, Michelle C. ;
Blackburn, J. Troy ;
Padua, Darin A. .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED BIOMECHANICS, 2015, 31 (04) :205-210
[5]   The association between loss of ankle dorsiflexion range of movement, and hip adduction and internal rotation during a step down test [J].
Bell-Jenje, T. ;
Olivier, B. ;
Wood, W. ;
Rogers, S. ;
Green, A. ;
McKinon, W. .
MANUAL THERAPY, 2016, 21 :256-261
[6]   Influence of trunk flexion on hip and knee joint kinematics during a controlled drop landing [J].
Blackburn, J. Troy ;
Padua, Darin A. .
CLINICAL BIOMECHANICS, 2008, 23 (03) :313-319
[7]   Lower extremity stiffness: implications for performance and injury [J].
Butler, RJ ;
Crowell, HP ;
Davis, IM .
CLINICAL BIOMECHANICS, 2003, 18 (06) :511-517
[8]   Reliability and Validity of a Weight-Bearing Measure of Ankle Dorsiflexion Range of Motion [J].
Chisholm, Martin D. ;
Birmingham, Trevor B. ;
Brown, Janet ;
MacDermid, Joy ;
Chesworth, Bert M. .
PHYSIOTHERAPY CANADA, 2012, 64 (04) :347-355
[9]  
Cosby NL., 2011, ATHL TRAIN SPORTS HL, V3, P76, DOI DOI 10.3928/19425864-20100930-02
[10]  
Denegar CR., 1993, J SPORT REHABIL, V2, P35, DOI [10.1123/jsr.2.1.35, DOI 10.1123/JSR.2.1.35]