Venture capital investment, intellectual property rights protection and firm innovation: evidence from China

被引:11
作者
Guo, Di [1 ]
Jiang, Kun [2 ]
机构
[1] Brunel Univ London, Business Sch, Kingson Lane, Uxbridge UB8 3PH, Middx, England
[2] Univ Nottingham, Business Sch, N Bldg,Jubilee Campus Wollaton Rd, Nottingham, England
关键词
Venture capital; innovation; intellectual property rights protection; VCFs' characteristics; PRODUCTIVITY GROWTH; POLITICAL-ECONOMY; PROPENSITY SCORE; PRIVATE FIRMS; GOVERNMENT; PERFORMANCE; PATENTS; FINANCE; INSTITUTIONS; REPUTATION;
D O I
10.1080/08985626.2022.2062618
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
We examine the heterogeneous effects of venture capital (VC) investment on firm innovation. Using a panel dataset of Chinese manufacturing firms, we find that VC-backed firms outperform non-VC-backed ones in patenting activities, new product sales, and exports because of the ex-ante selection and ex-post value-added effects of VC investment. Firms with better performance in innovation are more likely to get VC support, and such outperformance is magnified after the VC investment is made. Moreover, the impact of VC investment on firm innovation is greater when the protection of IPR is stronger. In addition, firms backed by more experienced VC firms (VCFs) generate more commercialized innovation but are less productive in patenting activities than firms backed by less experienced VCFs. Finally, firms backed by state-owned VCFs outperform in patenting activities but underperform in commercialized innovation those backed by other types of VCFs. Identification and selection issues are addressed by the propensity score matching approach and two-stage estimations.
引用
收藏
页码:434 / 470
页数:37
相关论文
共 101 条
[21]   Venture capital, innovation, and growth: evidence from Chinese metropolitan data [J].
Cheng, Cheng ;
Sun, Yangbin ;
Su, Yaqin ;
Yang, Shenggang .
APPLIED ECONOMICS LETTERS, 2019, 26 (07) :549-553
[22]   SOCIAL INSTITUTIONS AND SOCIAL-THEORY - COMMENTARY [J].
COLEMAN, JS .
AMERICAN SOCIOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1990, 55 (03) :333-339
[23]   Venture Capital Investments in Europe and Portfolio Firms' Economic Performance: Independent Versus Corporate Investors [J].
Colombo, Massimo G. ;
Murtinu, Samuele .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS & MANAGEMENT STRATEGY, 2017, 26 (01) :35-66
[24]   Governmental venture capital for innovative young firms [J].
Colombo, Massimo G. ;
Cumming, Douglas J. ;
Vismara, Silvio .
JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER, 2016, 41 (01) :10-24
[25]   The impact of venture capital on the productivity growth of European entrepreneurial firms: 'Screening' or 'value added' effect? [J].
Croce, Annalisa ;
Marti, Jose ;
Murtinu, Samuele .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS VENTURING, 2013, 28 (04) :489-510
[26]   Government policy towards entrepreneurial finance: Innovation investment funds [J].
Cumming, Douglas .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS VENTURING, 2007, 22 (02) :193-235
[27]   Boulevard of broken dreams: Why public efforts to boost entrepreneurship and venture capital have failed - and what to do about it [J].
Cumming, Douglas .
VENTURE CAPITAL, 2011, 13 (01) :75-94
[28]   Crowding out private equity: Canadian evidence [J].
Cumming, Douglas J. ;
MacIntosh, Jeffrey G. .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS VENTURING, 2006, 21 (05) :569-609
[29]   Governmental and independent venture capital investments in Europe: A firm-level performance analysis [J].
Cumming, Douglas J. ;
Grilli, Luca ;
Murtinu, Samuele .
JOURNAL OF CORPORATE FINANCE, 2017, 42 :439-459
[30]   Public policy and the creation of active venture capital markets [J].
Da Rin, Marco ;
Nicodano, Giovanna ;
Sembenelli, Alessandro .
JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ECONOMICS, 2006, 90 (8-9) :1699-1723