Comparative Efficacy of Targeted Systemic Therapies for Moderate to Severe Atopic Dermatitis without Topical Corticosteroids: Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis

被引:35
作者
Silverberg, Jonathan I. [1 ]
Hong, H. Chih-ho [2 ,7 ]
Thyssen, Jacob P. [3 ]
Calimlim, Brian M. [4 ]
Joshi, Avani [4 ]
Teixeira, Henrique D. [4 ]
Collins, Eric B. [5 ]
Crowell, Marjorie M. [5 ]
Johnson, Scott J. [5 ]
Armstrong, April W. [6 ]
机构
[1] George Washington Univ, Sch Med & Hlth Sci, Dept Dermatol, 2150 Penn Ave NW,Ste 2B-425, Washington, DC 20037 USA
[2] Univ British Columbia, Dept Dermatol & Skin Sci, Vancouver, BC, Canada
[3] Univ Copenhagen, Bispebjerg Hosp, Dept Dermatol, Copenhagen, Denmark
[4] AbbVie Inc, N Chicago, IL USA
[5] Medicus Econ LLC, Boston, MA USA
[6] Univ Southern Calif, Keck Sch Med, Dept Dermatol, Los Angeles, CA 90007 USA
[7] Prob Med Res, Surrey, BC, Canada
关键词
Atopic dermatitis; EASI; IGA; Network meta-analysis; Pruritus NRS; Systematic literature review; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; PATIENT BURDEN; DOUBLE-BLIND; ECZEMA; ADULTS; DUPILUMAB; PLACEBO; SAFETY; ADOLESCENTS; CHILDREN;
D O I
10.1007/s13555-022-00721-1
中图分类号
R75 [皮肤病学与性病学];
学科分类号
100206 ;
摘要
Introduction The comparative efficacy of targeted systemic therapies for moderate to severe atopic dermatitis (AD) has not been systematically assessed using recent phase 3 data. This network meta-analysis assesses the comparative efficacy of targeted systemic therapies without the addition of topical corticosteroids (TCS) and/or topical calcineurin inhibitors (TCI) in adults with moderate to severe AD. Methods The systematic literature review searched through 17 May 2021 for phase 3/4 trials with upadacitinib, interleukin-4 (IL-4), interleukin-13 (IL-13), or JAK inhibitors compared with placebo or active intervention for adults and adolescents with moderate to severe AD with inadequate response to TCS/TCI or for whom TCS/TCI was medically inadvisable, without restrictions on year or region. Researchers assessed data using PRISMA guidelines. The proportion of patients achieving trial co-primary endpoints [Investigator Global Assessment (IGA) score of 0 or 1 (clear or almost clear) and reduction of >= 2 points from baseline; proportion of patients achieving Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) improvement >= 75% from baseline (EASI-75)]; EASI improvement >= 90% from baseline (EASI-90); and >= 4-point improvement on Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale from baseline (Delta NRS >= 4) were evaluated using Bayesian network meta-analysis. Results Of 3415 initially identified records, network meta-analysis (NMA) ultimately included 6 records representing 9 unique studies. Two upadacitinib trials were also included. Eleven clinical trials including 6254 patients were analyzed. Upadacitinib 30 mg daily was the most efficacious therapy across all endpoints at the primary endpoint (week 12 or 16) and at earlier timepoints, followed by upadacitinib 15 mg daily and abrocitinib 200 mg daily. Discussion Many factors need to be considered for treatment selection for AD. These findings can help healthcare providers when personalizing a patient's treatment. Conclusion Upadacitinib 30 mg daily, upadacitinib 15 mg daily, and abrocitinib 200 mg daily may be the most efficacious targeted systemic therapies over 12-16 weeks of therapy in AD.
引用
收藏
页码:1181 / 1196
页数:16
相关论文
共 48 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2013, Guide to the Methods for Technology Appraisal
  • [2] Bormann, 2001, DIGITIZEIT VERSION 2
  • [3] TREatment of ATopic eczema (TREAT) Registry Taskforce: protocol for a European safety study of dupilumab and other systemic therapies in patients with atopic eczema
    Bosma, A. L.
    Spuls, P. I.
    Garcia-Doval, I.
    Naldi, L.
    Prieto-Merino, D.
    Tesch, F.
    Apfelbacher, C. J.
    Arents, B. W. M.
    Barbarot, S.
    Baselga, E.
    Deleuran, M.
    Eichenfield, L. F.
    Gerbens, L. A. A.
    Irvine, A. D.
    Manca, A.
    Mendes-Bastos, P.
    Middelkamp-Hup, M. A.
    Roberts, A.
    Seneschal, J.
    Svensson, A.
    Thyssen, J. P.
    Torres, T.
    Vermeulen, F. M.
    Vestergaard, C.
    von Kobyletzki, L. B.
    Wall, D.
    Weidinger, S.
    Schmitt, J.
    Flohr, C.
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGY, 2020, 182 (06) : 1423 - 1429
  • [4] Long-term effectiveness and safety of treatment with dupilumab in patients with atopic dermatitis: Results of the TREAT NL (TREatment of ATopic eczema, the Netherlands) registry
    Bosma, Angela L.
    de Wijs, Linde E. M.
    Hof, Michel H.
    van Nieuwenhuizen, Beau R.
    Gerbens, Louise A. A.
    Middelkamp-Hup, Maritza A.
    Hijnen, DirkJan
    Spuls, Phyllis, I
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF DERMATOLOGY, 2020, 83 (05) : 1375 - 1384
  • [5] Network meta-analysis for comparing treatment effects of multiple interventions: an introduction
    Catala-Lopez, Ferran
    Tobias, Aurelio
    Cameron, Chris
    Moher, David
    Hutton, Brian
    [J]. RHEUMATOLOGY INTERNATIONAL, 2014, 34 (11) : 1489 - 1496
  • [6] Centre for Reviews and Dissemination (CRD), 2009, SYSTEMATIC REV GUIDA
  • [7] Predictors of clinical success in a multidisciplinary model of atopic dermatitis treatment
    Chou, Janet S.
    LeBovidge, Jennifer
    Timmons, Karol
    Elverson, Wendy
    Morrill, Jaclyn
    Schneider, Lynda C.
    [J]. ALLERGY AND ASTHMA PROCEEDINGS, 2011, 32 (05) : 377 - 383
  • [8] Conceptual and Technical Challenges in Network Meta-analysis
    Cipriani, Andrea
    Higgins, Julian P. T.
    Geddes, John R.
    Salanti, Georgia
    [J]. ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2013, 159 (02) : 130 - W54
  • [9] ClinicalTrials.gov, A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of ABBV-8E12 in Subjects with Early Alzheimer's Disease
  • [10] ClinicalTrials.gov. Bethesda (MD): National Library of Medicine (US), 2021, IDENTIFIER NCT037383