Quantitative assessment of sample stiffness and sliding friction from force curves in atomic force microscopy

被引:25
|
作者
Pratt, Jon R. [1 ]
Shaw, Gordon A. [1 ]
Kumanchik, Lee [2 ]
Burnham, Nancy A. [3 ]
机构
[1] NIST, Gaithersburg, MD 20899 USA
[2] Univ Florida, Dept Mech Engn, Gainesville, FL 32611 USA
[3] Worcester Polytech Inst, Dept Phys, Worcester, MA 01609 USA
关键词
atomic force microscopy; calibration; cantilevers; elasticity; hysteresis; sliding friction; CANTILEVERS; CONTACT; PROBES;
D O I
10.1063/1.3284957
中图分类号
O59 [应用物理学];
学科分类号
摘要
It has long been recognized that the angular deflection of an atomic force microscope (AFM) cantilever under "normal" loading conditions can be profoundly influenced by the friction between the tip and the surface. It is shown here that a remarkably quantifiable hysteresis occurs in the slope of loading curves whenever the normal flexural stiffness of the AFM cantilever is greater than that of the sample. This situation arises naturally in cantilever-on-cantilever calibration, but also when trying to measure the stiffness of nanomechanical devices or test structures, or when probing any type of surface or structure that is much more compliant along the surface normal than in transverse directions. Expressions and techniques for evaluating the coefficient of sliding friction between the cantilever tip and sample from normal force curves, as well as relations for determining the stiffness of a mechanically compliant specimen are presented. The model is experimentally supported by the results of cantilever-on-cantilever spring constant calibrations. The cantilever spring constants determined here agree with the values determined using the NIST electrostatic force balance within the limits of the largest uncertainty component, which had a relative value of less than 2.5%. This points the way for quantitative testing of micromechanical and nanomechanical components, more accurate calibration of AFM force, and provides nanotribologists access to information about contact friction from normal force curves.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Atomistic study of lateral contact stiffness in friction force microscopy
    Gao, H.
    Dong, Y.
    Martini, A.
    TRIBOLOGY INTERNATIONAL, 2014, 74 : 57 - 61
  • [32] Theoretical simulation of atomic-scale friction in atomic force microscopy
    Sasaki, N
    Kobayashi, K
    Tsukada, M
    SURFACE SCIENCE, 1996, 357 (1-3) : 92 - 95
  • [33] Bidirectional quantitative force gradient microscopy
    Reiche, Christopher F.
    Vock, Silvia
    Neu, Volker
    Schultz, Ludwig
    Buechner, Bernd
    Muehl, Thomas
    NEW JOURNAL OF PHYSICS, 2015, 17
  • [34] FC_analysis: a tool for investigating atomic force microscopy maps of force curves
    Dinarelli, Simone
    Girasole, Marco
    Longo, Giovanni
    BMC BIOINFORMATICS, 2018, 19
  • [35] Why do atomic force microscopy force curves still exhibit jump to contact?
    Rodrigues, Mario S.
    Costa, Luca
    Chevrier, Joel
    Comin, Fabio
    APPLIED PHYSICS LETTERS, 2012, 101 (20)
  • [36] FC_analysis: a tool for investigating atomic force microscopy maps of force curves
    Simone Dinarelli
    Marco Girasole
    Giovanni Longo
    BMC Bioinformatics, 19
  • [37] Atomic force microscopy force-distance curves with small amplitude ultrasonic modulation
    Ma, Chengfu
    Chen, Yuhang
    Wang, Tian
    Chu, Jiaru
    SCANNING, 2015, 37 (04) : 284 - 293
  • [38] Stochastic simulation of tip-sample interactions in atomic force microscopy
    Labuda, Aleksander
    Lysy, Martin
    Gruetter, Peter
    APPLIED PHYSICS LETTERS, 2012, 101 (11)
  • [39] A Novel Harmonic Atomic Force Microscopy With Tip-Sample Couplings
    Feng, Ke
    Lai, Jianhao
    Gao, Jiarui
    Cui, Chaoyu
    Zhu, Benliang
    Zhang, Xianmin
    IEEE-ASME TRANSACTIONS ON MECHATRONICS, 2024, 29 (03) : 2220 - 2229
  • [40] Quantitative characterization of adhesion and stiffness of corneal lens of Drosophila melanogaster using atomic force microscopy
    Devi, A. L. Lavanya
    Nongthomba, Upendra
    Bobji, M. S.
    JOURNAL OF THE MECHANICAL BEHAVIOR OF BIOMEDICAL MATERIALS, 2016, 53 : 161 - 173