Research priorities for young people with cancer: a UK priority setting partnership with the James Lind Alliance

被引:51
作者
Aldiss, Susie [1 ]
Fern, Lorna A. [2 ,3 ]
Phillips, Robert S. [4 ]
Callaghan, Amy [5 ]
Dyker, Karen [6 ]
Gravestock, Helen [7 ]
Groszmann, Michael [8 ]
Hamrang, Leila [5 ]
Hough, Rachael [9 ]
McGeachy, Demi [5 ]
Morgan, Sue [10 ]
Smith, Sam [11 ]
Upadhyaya, Sheela [12 ]
Veitch, Helen [11 ]
Veitch, Lara [3 ,5 ]
Williamson, Max [3 ,5 ]
Whelan, Jeremy S. [2 ]
Gibson, Faith [1 ,13 ]
机构
[1] Univ Surrey, Sch Hlth Sci, Guildford, Surrey, England
[2] Univ Coll London Hosp NHS Fdn Trust, Oncol Div, London, England
[3] Natl Canc Res Inst, Teenage Young Adult & Germ Cell Clin Studies Grp, London, England
[4] Univ York, Ctr Reviews & Disseminat, York, N Yorkshire, England
[5] Teenage & Young Adult Canc Prior Setting Partners, London, England
[6] St James Univ Hosp, Oncol, Level 4,Bexley Wing, Leeds, W Yorkshire, England
[7] CLIC Sargent, Policy & Campaigning, London, England
[8] Univ Coll London Hosp NHS Fdn Trust, Paediat & Adolescent Div, London, England
[9] Univ Coll London Hosp NHS Fdn Trust, Children & Young Peoples Canc Serv, London, England
[10] Leeds Gen Infirm, Teenage & Young Adult Canc Serv, Leeds, W Yorkshire, England
[11] Teenage Canc Trust, Serv Delivery, London, England
[12] Natl Inst Hlth Res Evaluat, James Lind Alliance, Southampton, Hants, England
[13] Great Ormond St Hosp Children NHS Fdn Trust, Ctr Outcomes & Experience Res Childrens Hlth Illn, London, England
关键词
teenage; cancer; young aduly; adolescent; james lind alliance; research priorities; ADULTS; ADOLESCENTS; APPROPRIATE; TEENAGERS; CHILDREN;
D O I
10.1136/bmjopen-2018-028119
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives To conduct a UK-wide survey of young people who have experienced cancer, carers and professionals, to identify and prioritise research questions to inform decisions of research funders and support the case for research with this unique cancer population. Design James Lind Alliance Priority Setting Partnership. Setting UK health service and community. Methods A steering group oversaw the initiative and partner organisations were recruited. Unanswered questions were collected in an online survey. Evidence searching verified uncertainties. An interim survey was used to rank questions prior to a final prioritisation workshop. Participants Young people aged 13-24 years with a current or previous cancer diagnosis, their families, friends, partners and professionals who work with this population. Results Two hundred and ninety-two respondents submitted 855 potential questions. Following a refining process and removal of 'out of scope' questions, 208 unique questions remained. Systematic evidence checking identified seven answered questions and 16 were the subject of ongoing studies. The interim survey was completed by 174 participants. The top 30 questions were prioritised at a workshop attended by 25 young people, parents and multidisciplinary professionals. The top three priorities are: (1) What psychological support package improves psychological well-being, social functioning and mental health during and after treatment? (2) What interventions, including self-care, can reduce or reverse adverse short-term and long-term effects of cancer treatment? (3) What are the best strategies to improve access to clinical trials? The remaining questions reflect the complete cancer pathway: new therapies, life after cancer, support, education/employment, relapse and end-of-life care. Conclusions We have identified shared research priorities for young people with cancer using a rigorous, person-centred approach involving stakeholders typically not involved in setting the research agenda. The breadth of priorities suggest future research should focus on holistic and psychosocial care delivery as well as traditional drug/biology research.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]  
All Party Parliamentary Group on Children TaYAwC, 2018, LIST WHAT MATT YOUNG
[2]  
Alliance JL, 2018, J LIND ALL GUID
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2017, HIDDEN COSTS MENTAL
[4]   Classification and incidence of cancers in adolescents and young adults in England 1979-1997 [J].
Birch, JM ;
Alston, RD ;
Kelsey, AM ;
Quinn, MJ ;
Babb, P ;
McNally, RJQ .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2002, 87 (11) :1267-1274
[5]   The distinctive biology of cancer in adolescents and young adults [J].
Bleyer, Archie ;
Barr, Ronald ;
Hayes-Lattin, Brandon ;
Thomas, David ;
Ellis, Chad ;
Anderson, Barry .
NATURE REVIEWS CANCER, 2008, 8 (04) :288-298
[6]   Role of clinical trials in survival progress of American adolescents and young adults with cancerand lack thereof [J].
Bleyer, Archie ;
Tai, Eric ;
Siegel, Stuart .
PEDIATRIC BLOOD & CANCER, 2018, 65 (08)
[7]   Should adolescents with acute lymphoblastic leukemia be treated as old children or young adults?: Comparison of the French FRALLE-93 and LALA-94 trials [J].
Boissel, N ;
Auclerc, MF ;
Lhéritier, V ;
Perel, Y ;
Thomas, X ;
Leblanc, T ;
Rousselot, P ;
Cayuela, JM ;
Gabert, J ;
Fegueux, N ;
Piguet, C ;
Huguet-Rigal, F ;
Berthou, C ;
Boiron, JM ;
Poutos, C ;
Michel, G ;
Fière, D ;
Leverger, G ;
Dombret, H ;
Baruchel, A .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2003, 21 (05) :774-780
[8]   Tackling treatment uncertainties together: the evolution of the James Lind Initiative, 2003-2013 [J].
Chalmers, Iain ;
Atkinson, Patricia ;
Fenton, Mark ;
Firkins, Lester ;
Crowe, Sally ;
Cowan, Katherine .
JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY OF MEDICINE, 2013, 106 (12) :482-491
[9]  
CR UK, 2018, YOUNG PEOPL CANC STA
[10]   Patients’, clinicians’ and the research communities’ priorities for treatment research: There is an important mismatch [J].
Crowe S. ;
Fenton M. ;
Hall M. ;
Cowan K. ;
Chalmers I. .
Research Involvement and Engagement, 1 (1)