Hayekian welfare states: explaining the coexistence of economic freedom and big government

被引:25
作者
Bergh, Andreas [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Lund Univ, Dept Econ, Lund, Sweden
[2] Res Inst Ind Econ IFN, Stockholm, Sweden
基金
瑞典研究理事会;
关键词
Welfare state; Hayek; economic freedom; economic reforms; state capacity; SIZE; INSTITUTIONS; INEQUALITY; REGIMES; GROWTH;
D O I
10.1017/S1744137419000432
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
To explain the coexistence of economic freedom and big government, this paper distinguishes between big government in the fiscal sense of requiring high taxes, and big government in the Hayekian sense of requiring knowledge that is difficult to acquire from a central authority. The indicators of government size in measures of economic freedom capture the fiscal size but ignore the Hayekian knowledge problem. Thinking about government size in both the fiscal and Hayekian dimensions suggests the possibility of Hayekian welfare states where trust and state capacity facilitate experimentation and learning, resulting in a public sector that is big in a fiscal sense but not necessarily more vulnerable to the Hayekian knowledge problem. Pensions in Sweden are used as a case to illustrate the empirical relevance of the argument. The new pension system represents big government in a fiscal sense, but by relying on decentralized choice it requires relatively little central knowledge.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 12
页数:12
相关论文
共 60 条
[21]   Does social trust speed up reforms? The case of central-bank independence [J].
Berggren, Niclas ;
Daunfeldt, Sven-Olov ;
Hellstrom, Jorgen .
JOURNAL OF INSTITUTIONAL ECONOMICS, 2016, 12 (02) :395-415
[22]   The universal welfare state: Theory and the case of Sweden [J].
Bergh, A .
POLITICAL STUDIES, 2004, 52 (04) :745-766
[23]  
Bergh A, 2015, ECON J WATCH, V12, P22
[24]   GOVERNMENT SIZE AND GROWTH: A SURVEY AND INTERPRETATION OF THE EVIDENCE [J].
Bergh, Andreas ;
Henrekson, Magnus .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC SURVEYS, 2011, 25 (05) :872-897
[25]   Historical Trust Levels Predict the Current Size of the Welfare State [J].
Bergh, Andreas ;
Bjornskov, Christian .
KYKLOS, 2011, 64 (01) :1-19
[26]   Liberalization without Retrenchment: Understanding the Consensus on Swedish Welfare State Reforms [J].
Bergh, Andreas ;
Erlingsson, Gissur O. .
SCANDINAVIAN POLITICAL STUDIES, 2009, 32 (01) :71-93
[27]   How does social trust lead to better governance? An attempt to separate electoral and bureaucratic mechanisms [J].
Bjornskov, Christian .
PUBLIC CHOICE, 2010, 144 (1-2) :323-346
[28]  
Breyer F., 1997, EUR J POLIT ECON, V13, P705
[29]   WHY SOCIAL INSURANCE BUDGET IS TOO LARGE IN A DEMOCRACY [J].
BROWNING, EK .
ECONOMIC INQUIRY, 1975, 13 (03) :373-388
[30]   Political sustainability and the design of social insurance [J].
Casamatta, G ;
Cremer, H ;
Pestieau, P .
JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ECONOMICS, 2000, 75 (03) :341-364