Perineural invasion is a marker for pathologically advanced disease in localized prostate cancer

被引:56
作者
Lee, Irwin H.
Roberts, Rebecca
Shah, Rajal B.
Wojno, Kirk J.
Wei, John T.
Sandler, Howard M.
机构
[1] Univ Michigan, Dept Radiat Oncol, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[2] Univ Michigan, Dept Biostat, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[3] Univ Michigan, Dept Pathol, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[4] Univ Michigan, Dept Urol, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
来源
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS | 2007年 / 68卷 / 04期
关键词
perineural invasion; prostate cancer; risk stratification; Gleason score; pathologic stage; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIAL; EXTERNAL-BEAM RADIOTHERAPY; PHASE-III TRIAL; RADIATION-THERAPY; RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY; ANDROGEN SUPPRESSION; GLEASON SCORE; NEEDLE-BIOPSY; LOW-RISK; BRACHYTHERAPY;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijrobp.2007.01.039
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: To determine if perineural invasion (PNI) should be included in addition to prostate-specific antigen (PSA), biopsy Gleason score, and clinical T-stage for risk-stratification of patients with localized prostate cancer. Methods and Materials: We analyzed prostatectomy findings for 1550 patients, from a prospectively collected institutional database, to determine whether PNI was a significant predictor for upgrading of Gleason score or pathologic T3 disease after patients were stratified into low-, intermediate-, and high-risk groups (on the basis of PSA, biopsy Gleason score, and clinical T-stage). Results: For the overall population, PNI was associated with a significantly increased frequency of upgrading and of pathologic T3 disease. After stratification, PNI was still associated with significantly increased odds of pathologic T3 disease within each risk group. In particular, for low-risk patients, there was a markedly increased risk of extraprostatic extension (23% vs. 7%), comparable to that of intermediate-risk patients. Among high-risk patients, PNI was associated with an increased risk of seminal vesicle invasion and lymph node involvement. Furthermore, over 80% of high-risk patients with PNI were noted to have an indication for postoperative radiation. Conclusions: Perineural invasion may be useful for risk-stratification of prostate cancer. Our data suggest that low-risk patients with PNI on biopsy may benefit from treatment typically reserved for those with intermediate-risk disease. In addition, men with high-risk disease and PNI, who are contemplating surgery, should be informed of the high likelihood of having an indication for postoperative radiation therapy. (C) 2007 Elsevier Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:1059 / 1064
页数:6
相关论文
共 24 条
  • [1] Growth and survival mechanisms associated with perineural invasion in prostate cancer
    Ayala, GE
    Dai, H
    Ittmann, M
    Li, R
    Powell, M
    Frolov, A
    Wheeler, TM
    Thompson, TC
    Rowley, D
    [J]. CANCER RESEARCH, 2004, 64 (17) : 6082 - 6090
  • [2] Perineural invasion is associated with increased relapse after external beam radiotherapy for men with low-risk prostate cancer and may be a marker for occult, high-grade cancer
    Beard, CJ
    Chen, MH
    Cote, K
    Loffredo, M
    Renshaw, AA
    Hurwitz, M
    D'Amico, AV
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2004, 58 (01): : 19 - 24
  • [3] Perineural invasion associated with increased cancer-specific mortality after external beam radiation therapy for men with low- and intermediate-risk prostate cancer
    Beard, Clair
    Schultz, Delray
    Loffredo, Marian
    Cote, Kerri
    Renshaw, Andrew A.
    Hurwitz, Mark D.
    D'Amico, Anthony V.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2006, 66 (02): : 403 - 407
  • [4] Postoperative radiotherapy after radical prostatectomy:: a randomised controlled trial (EORTC trial 22911)
    Bolla, M
    van Poppel, H
    Collette, L
    van Cangh, P
    Vekemans, K
    Da Pozzo, L
    de Reijke, TM
    Verbaeys, A
    Bosset, JF
    van Velthoven, R
    Maréchal, JM
    Scalliet, P
    Haustermans, K
    Piérart, M
    [J]. LANCET, 2005, 366 (9485) : 572 - 578
  • [5] Long-term results with immediate androgen suppression and external irradiation in patients with locally advanced prostate cancer (an EORTC study): a phase III randomised trial
    Bolla, M
    Collette, L
    Blank, L
    Warde, P
    Dubois, JB
    Mirimanoff, RO
    Storme, G
    Bernier, J
    Kuten, A
    Sternberg, C
    Mattelaer, J
    Torecilla, JL
    Pfeffer, JR
    Cutajar, CL
    Zurlo, A
    Pierart, M
    [J]. LANCET, 2002, 360 (9327) : 103 - 108
  • [6] Increasing the number of biopsy cores improves the concordance of biopsy Gleason score to prostatectomy Gleason score
    Coogan, CL
    Latchamsetty, KC
    Greenfield, J
    Corman, JM
    Lynch, B
    Porter, CR
    [J]. BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2005, 96 (03) : 324 - 327
  • [7] Biochemical outcome after radical prostatectomy, external beam radiation therapy, or interstitial radiation therapy for clinically localized prostate cancer
    D'Amico, AV
    Whittington, R
    Malkowicz, SB
    Schultz, D
    Blank, K
    Broderick, GA
    Tomaszewski, JE
    Renshaw, AA
    Kaplan, I
    Beard, CJ
    Wein, A
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1998, 280 (11): : 969 - 974
  • [8] 6-month androgen suppression plus radiation therapy vs radiation therapy alone for patients with clinically localized prostate cancer - A randomized controlled trial
    D'Amico, AV
    Manola, J
    Loffredo, M
    Renshaw, AA
    DellaCroce, A
    Kantoff, PW
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2004, 292 (07): : 821 - 827
  • [9] Perineural invasion on prostate needle biopsy: An independent predictor of final pathologic stage
    de la Taille, A
    Katz, A
    Bagiella, E
    Olsson, CA
    O'Toole, KM
    Rubin, MA
    [J]. UROLOGY, 1999, 54 (06) : 1039 - 1043
  • [10] The value of multiple core biopsies for predicting the Gleason score of prostate cancer
    Egevad, L
    Norlén, BJ
    Norberg, M
    [J]. BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2001, 88 (07) : 716 - 721