Impact of packet loss on 4K UHD video for portable devices

被引：8
作者：
Adeyemi-Ejeye, Anthony O. [1 ]
Alreshoodi, Mohammed [2 ]
Al-Jobouri, Laith [3 ]
Fleury, Martin [3 ]
机构：
[1] Univ Surrey, Dept Mus & Media, Innovat Media Lab, Guildford GU2 7XH, Surrey, England
[2] Qassim Univ, Univ Coll, Buraydah, Saudi Arabia
[3] Univ Suffolk, Sch Sci Technol & Engn, Ipswich IP4 1QJ, Suffolk, England
来源：
MULTIMEDIA TOOLS AND APPLICATIONS | 2019年 / 78卷 / 22期
关键词：
4K UHD; H; 264; AVC; HEVC; IEEE; 802; ad; Packet loss visibility; QUALITY ASSESSMENT; EFFICIENCY; HEVC; VISIBILITY; EVOLUTION;
D O I：
10.1007/s11042-019-07996-1
中图分类号：
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号：
0812 ;
摘要：
Ultra High Definition (UHD) video streaming to portable devices has become topical. Two standardized codecs are current, H.264/Advanced Video Coding (AVC) and the more recent High Efficiency Video Coding (HEVC). This paper compares the two codecs' robustness to packet loss, after making allowances for relative coding gain. A significant finding from the comparison is that the H.264/AVC codec is less impacted by packet loss than HEVC, despite their differing coding efficiencies and including at low levels of packet loss. The results will be especially relevant to those designing portable devices with 4K UHD video display capability, allowing them to estimate the level of error concealment necessary. The paper also includes the results of HEVC compressed UHD video streaming over an IEEE 802.11ad wireless link operating at 60 GHz as a pointer to future performance in an error-prone channel.
引用
收藏
页码：31733 / 31755
页数：23
相关论文
共 71 条
  • [61] Stockhammer T., 2007, MULTIMEDIA IP WIRELE, P13, DOI DOI 10.1016/B978-012088480-3/50003-5
  • [62] Ultra-High-Definition Television (Rec. ITU-R BT.2020): A Generational Leap in the Evolution of Television
    Sugawara, Masayuki
    Choi, Seo-Young
    Wood, David
    [J]. IEEE SIGNAL PROCESSING MAGAZINE, 2014, 31 (03) : 170 - 174
  • [63] Sukho Lee, 2016, 2016 IEEE 6th International Conference on Consumer Electronics - Berlin (ICCE-Berlin), P94, DOI 10.1109/ICCE-Berlin.2016.7684727
  • [64] Video Quality Evaluation Methodology and Verification Testing of HEVC Compression Performance
    Tan, Thiow Keng
    Weerakkody, Rajitha
    Mrak, Marta
    Ramzan, Naeem
    Baroncini, Vittorio
    Ohm, Jens-Rainer
    Sullivan, Gary J.
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON CIRCUITS AND SYSTEMS FOR VIDEO TECHNOLOGY, 2016, 26 (01) : 76 - 90
  • [65] Single-Element and Phased-Array Transceiver Chipsets for 60-GHz Gb/s Communications
    Valdes-Garcia, Alberto
    Reynolds, Scott
    Natarajan, Arun
    Kam, Dong
    Liu, Duixian
    Lai, Jie-Wei
    Huang, Yen-Lin Oscar
    Chen, Ping-Yu
    Tsai, Ming-Da
    Zhan, Jing-Hong Conan
    Nicolson, Sean
    Floyd, Brian
    [J]. IEEE COMMUNICATIONS MAGAZINE, 2011, 49 (04) : 120 - 131
  • [66] VQEG, 2014, FIN REP VID QUAL EXP
  • [67] Image quality assessment: From error visibility to structural similarity
    Wang, Z
    Bovik, AC
    Sheikh, HR
    Simoncelli, EP
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON IMAGE PROCESSING, 2004, 13 (04) : 600 - 612
  • [68] Overview of the H.264/AVC video coding standard
    Wiegand, T
    Sullivan, GJ
    Bjontegaard, G
    Luthra, A
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON CIRCUITS AND SYSTEMS FOR VIDEO TECHNOLOGY, 2003, 13 (07) : 560 - 576
  • [69] The evolution of video quality measurement: From PSNR to hybrid metrics
    Winkler, Stefan
    Mohandas, Praveen
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON BROADCASTING, 2008, 54 (03) : 660 - 668
  • [70] Wood D, 2011, HDTV ITU R EBU TECH
12345678