Effectiveness of a Mailed Colorectal Cancer Screening Outreach Program in Community Health Clinics The STOP CRC Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial

被引:99
作者
Coronado, Gloria D. [1 ]
Petrik, Amanda F. [1 ]
Vollmer, William M. [1 ]
Taplin, Stephen H. [2 ]
Keast, Erin M. [1 ]
Fields, Scott [3 ]
Green, Beverly B. [4 ]
机构
[1] Kaiser Permanente Ctr Hlth Res, 3800 N Interstate Ave, Portland, OR 97227 USA
[2] NCI, Ctr Global Hlth, Rockville, MD USA
[3] OCHIN, Portland, OR USA
[4] Kaiser Permanente Washington Hlth Res Inst, Seattle, WA USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
FECAL OCCULT BLOOD; COLON-CANCER; CENTERS; RATES; STRATEGIES; MORTALITY;
D O I
10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.3629
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
IMPORTANCE Approximately 24 million US individuals receive care at federally qualified health centers, which historically have low rates of colorectal cancer screening. The US Preventive Services Task Force recommends routine colorectal cancer screening for individuals aged 50 to 75 years. OBJECTIVE To determine the effectiveness of an electronic health record (EHR)-embedded mailed fecal immunochemical test (FIT) outreach program implemented in health centers as part of standard care. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This cluster randomized pragmatic clinical trial was conducted in 26 federally qualified health center clinics, representing 8 health centers in Oregon and California, randomized to intervention (n = 13) or usual care (n = 13). All participants were overdue for colorectal cancer screening during the accrual interval (February 4, 2014 to February 3, 2015). INTERVENTIONS Electronic health record-embedded tools to identify eligible adults and to facilitate implementation of a stepwise mailed intervention involving (1) an introductory letter, (2) a mailed FIT, and (3) a reminder letter; training, collaborative learning, and facilitation through a practice improvement process. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Effectiveness was measured as clinic-level proportions of adults who completed a FIT, and secondarily, any colorectal cancer screening within 12 months of accrual or by August 3, 2015. Implementation was measured as clinic-level proportions of adults who were mailed an introductory letter and ordered a FIT. RESULTS Twenty-six clinics with 41193 adults (mean [SD] age, 58.5 [6.3] years; 22 994 women) were randomized to receive the direct mail colorectal screening intervention (13 clinics; 21134 patients) or usual care (13 clinics; 20 059 patients). Compared with usual care clinics, intervention clinics had significantly higher adjusted clinic-level proportion of participants who completed a FIT (13.9% vs 10.4%; difference, 3.4 percentage points; 95% CI, 0.1%-6.8%) and any colorectal cancer screening (18.3% vs 14.5%; difference, 3.8 percentage points; 95% CI, 0.6%-7.0%). We observed large variation across health centers in effectiveness (FIT completion differences range, -7.4 percentage points to 17.6 percentage points) and implementation (proportion who were mailed a FIT range, 6.5% to 68.2%). The number needed to mail to achieve a completed FIT was 4.8 overall, and 4.0 in clinics that mailed a FIT reminder. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE An EHR-embedded mailed FIT outreach intervention significantly improved rates of FIT completion and rates of any colorectal cancer screening. Higher rates of colorectal cancer screening occurred in clinics that successfully implemented the mailed outreach program.
引用
收藏
页码:1174 / 1181
页数:8
相关论文
共 25 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2008, US PREVENTIVE SERVIC
  • [2] Comparative Effectiveness of a Multifaceted Intervention to Improve Adherence to Annual Colorectal Cancer Screening in Community Health Centers A Randomized Clinical Trial
    Baker, David W.
    Brown, Tiffany
    Buchanan, David R.
    Weil, Jordan
    Balsley, Kate
    Ranalli, Lauren
    Lee, Ji Young
    Cameron, Kenzie A.
    Ferreira, M. Rosario
    Stephens, Quinn
    Goldman, Shira N.
    Rademaker, Alred
    Wolf, Michael S.
    [J]. JAMA INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2014, 174 (08) : 1235 - 1241
  • [3] Coronado GD, 2014, J GEN PRACT LOS ANGE, V2, P2
  • [4] Implementation successes and challenges in participating in a pragmatic study to improve colon cancer screening: perspectives of health center leaders
    Coronado, Gloria D.
    Schneider, Jennifer L.
    Petrik, Amanda
    Rivelli, Jennifer
    Taplin, Stephen
    Green, Beverly B.
    [J]. TRANSLATIONAL BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE, 2017, 7 (03) : 557 - 566
  • [5] Recruiting community health centers into pragmatic research: Findings from STOP CRC
    Coronado, Gloria D.
    Retecki, Sally
    Schneider, Jennifer
    Taplin, Stephen H.
    Burdick, Tim
    Green, Beverly B.
    [J]. CLINICAL TRIALS, 2016, 13 (02) : 214 - 222
  • [6] Strategies and Opportunities to STOP Colon Cancer in Priority Populations: Design of a cluster-randomized pragmatic trial
    Coronado, Gloria D.
    Vollmer, William M.
    Petrik, Amanda
    Taplin, Stephen H.
    Burdick, Timothy E.
    Meenan, Richard T.
    Green, Beverly B.
    [J]. CONTEMPORARY CLINICAL TRIALS, 2014, 38 (02) : 344 - 349
  • [7] Strategies and opportunities to STOP colon cancer in priority populations: pragmatic pilot study design and outcomes
    Coronado, Gloria D.
    Vollmer, William M.
    Petrik, Amanda
    Aguirre, Josue
    Kapka, Tanya
    DeVoe, Jennifer
    Puro, Jon
    Tran Miers
    Lembach, Jennifer
    Turner, Ann
    Sanchez, Jennifer
    Retecki, Sally
    Nelson, Christine
    Green, Beverly
    [J]. BMC CANCER, 2014, 14
  • [8] Advantages of Wordless Instructions on How to Complete a Fecal Immunochemical Test: Lessons from Patient Advisory Council Members of a Federally Qualified Health Center
    Coronado, Gloria D.
    Sanchez, Jen
    Petrik, Amanda
    Kapka, Tanya
    DeVoe, Jen
    Green, Beverly
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CANCER EDUCATION, 2014, 29 (01) : 86 - 90
  • [9] Effectiveness of a Clinic-Based Colorectal Cancer Screening Promotion Program for Underserved Hispanics
    Coronado, Gloria D.
    Golovaty, Ilya
    Longton, Gary
    Levy, Lisa
    Jimenez, Ricardo
    [J]. CANCER, 2011, 117 (08) : 1745 - 1754
  • [10] Applying the Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) approach to a large pragmatic study involving safety net clinics
    Coury, Jennifer
    Schneider, Jennifer L.
    Rivelli, Jennifer S.
    Petrik, Amanda F.
    Seibel, Evelyn
    D'Agostini, Brieshon
    Taplin, Stephen H.
    Green, Beverly B.
    Coronado, Gloria D.
    [J]. BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2017, 17