Impact of FDG-PET/CT imaging on nodal staging for head-and-neck squamous cell carcinoma

被引:126
作者
Murakami, Ryuji
Uozumi, Hideaki
Hirai, Toshinori
Nishimura, Ryuichi
Tomiguchi, Seiji
Oya, Natsuo
Katsuragawa, Shigehiko
Yamashita, Yasuyuki
机构
[1] Kumamoto Univ Hosp, Dept Radiat Oncol, Kumamoto 8608556, Japan
[2] Kumamoto Univ Hosp, Dept Diagnost Radiol, Kumamoto 8608556, Japan
[3] Kumamoto Univ Hosp, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, Kumamoto 8608556, Japan
[4] Kumamoto Univ Hosp, Dept Otolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, Kumamoto 8608556, Japan
[5] Kumamoto Univ, Sch Hlth Sci, Dept Med Informat Syst, Kumamoto, Japan
[6] Kumamoto City Hosp, Dept Radiol, Kumamoto, Japan
[7] Uozumi Clin, Kumamoto, Japan
来源
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS | 2007年 / 68卷 / 02期
关键词
PET/CT imaging; head-and-neck cancer; nodal staging; GTV;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijrobp.2006.12.032
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: To evaluate the impact of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (FDG-PET/CT) imaging on nodal staging for head-and-neck squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). Methods and Materials: The study population consisted of 23 patients with head-and-neck SCC who were evaluated with FDG-PET/CT and went on to neck dissection. Two observers consensually determined the lesion size and maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) and compared the results with pathologic findings on nodal-level involvement. Two different observers (A and B) independently performed three protocols for clinical nodal staging. Methods 1, 2, and 3 were based on conventional modalities, additional visual information from FDG-PET/CT images, and FDG-PET/CT imaging alone with SUV data, respectively. Results: All primary tumors were visualized with FDG-PET/CT. Pathologically, 19 positive and 93 negative nodal levels were identified. The SUVmax overlapped in negative and positive nodes < 15 mm in diameter. According to receiver operating characteristics analysis, the size-based SUVmax cutoff values were 1.9, 2.5, and 3.0 for lymph nodes < 10 mm, 10-15 mm, and > 15 mm, respectively. These cutoff values yielded 79% sensitivity and 99% specificity for nodal-level staging. For Observer A, the sensitivity and specificity in Methods 1, 2, and 3 were 68% and 94%, 68% and 99%, and 84% and 99%, respectively, and Method 3 yielded significantly higher accuracy than Method 1 (p = 0.0269). For Observer B, Method 3 yielded the highest sensitivity (84%) and specificity (99%); however, the difference among the three protocols was not statistically significant. Conclusion: Imaging with FDG-PET/CT with size-based SUVmax cutoff values is an important modality for radiation therapy planning. (C) 2007 Elsevier Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:377 / 382
页数:6
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]   Prospective comparison of 18F-FDG PET with conventional imaging modalities (CT, MRI, US) in lymph node staging of head and neck cancer [J].
Adams, S ;
Baum, RP ;
Stuckensen, T ;
Bitter, K ;
Hör, G .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 1998, 25 (09) :1255-1260
[2]   PET imaging in oncology [J].
Bar-Shalom, R ;
Valdivia, AY ;
Blaufox, MD .
SEMINARS IN NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2000, 30 (03) :150-185
[3]   Head and neck malignancy: Is PET/CT more accurate than PET or CT alone? [J].
Branstetter, BF ;
Blodgett, TM ;
Zimmer, LA ;
Snyderman, CH ;
Johnson, JT ;
Raman, S ;
Meltzer, CC .
RADIOLOGY, 2005, 235 (02) :580-586
[4]   Tumor volume in pharyngolaryngeal squamous cell carcinoma:: Comparison at CT, MR imaging, and FDG PET and validation with surgical specimen [J].
Daisne, JF ;
Duprez, T ;
Weynand, B ;
Lonneux, M ;
Hamoir, M ;
Reychler, H ;
Grégoire, V .
RADIOLOGY, 2004, 233 (01) :93-100
[5]   Rational diagnosis of squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck region:: Comparative evaluation of CT, MRI, and 18FDG PET [J].
Dammann, F ;
Horger, M ;
Mueller-Berg, M ;
Schlemmer, H ;
Claussen, C ;
Hoffman, J ;
Eschmann, S ;
Bares, R .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2005, 184 (04) :1326-1331
[6]   Combined PET-CT in the head and neck Part 2. Diagnostic uses and pitfalls of oncologic imaging [J].
Fukui, MB ;
Blodgett, TM ;
Snyderman, CH ;
Johnson, JJ ;
Myers, EN ;
Townsend, DW ;
Meltzer, CC .
RADIOGRAPHICS, 2005, 25 (04) :913-930
[7]   Inter-observer variability in the delineation of pharyngo-laryngeal tumor, parotid glands and cervical spinal cord:: Comparison between CT-scan and MRI [J].
Geets, X ;
Daisne, JF ;
Arcangeli, S ;
Coche, E ;
De Poel, M ;
Duprez, T ;
Nardella, G ;
Grégoire, V .
RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2005, 77 (01) :25-31
[8]   Imaging of cervical lymph nodes in head and neck cancer: The basics [J].
Gor, DM ;
Langer, JE ;
Loevner, LA .
RADIOLOGIC CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2006, 44 (01) :101-+
[9]   Evaluation of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography and computed tomography with histopathologic correlation in the initial staging of head and neck cancer [J].
Hannah, A ;
Scott, AM ;
Tochon-Danguy, H ;
Chan, JG ;
Akhurst, T ;
Berlangieri, S ;
Price, D ;
Smith, GJ ;
Schelleman, T ;
McKay, WJ ;
Sizeland, A .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2002, 236 (02) :208-217
[10]   Use of a corrected standardized uptake value based on the lesion size on CT permits accurate characterization of lung nodules on FDG-PET [J].
Hickeson, M ;
Yun, MJ ;
Matthies, A ;
Zhuang, HM ;
Adam, LE ;
Lacorte, L ;
Alavi, A .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2002, 29 (12) :1639-1647