Sensitivity of storm wave modeling to wind stress evaluation methods

被引:30
作者
Chen, Yingjian [1 ]
Yu, Xiping [1 ]
机构
[1] Tsinghua Univ, Dept Hydraul Engn, State Key Lab Hydrosci & Engn, Beijing, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
SEA MOMENTUM EXCHANGE; DRAG COEFFICIENT; SURFACE-WAVES; FINITE-VOLUME; OCEAN; SPRAY;
D O I
10.1002/2016MS000850
中图分类号
P4 [大气科学(气象学)];
学科分类号
0706 ; 070601 ;
摘要
The application of the wave boundary layer model (WBLM) for wind stress evaluation to storm wave modeling is studied using Hurricane Katrina (2005) as an example, which is chosen due to its great intensity and good availability of field data. The WBLM is based on the momentum and energy conservation equations and takes into account the physical details of air-sea interaction processes as well as energy dissipation due to the presence of sea spray. Four widely-used bulk-type formulas are also used for comparison. Simulated significant wave heights with WBLM are shown to agree well with the observed data over deep water. The WBLM yields a smaller wind stress coefficient on the left hand side of the hurricane track, which is reasonable considering the effect of the sea state on momentum transfer. Quantitative results show that large differences of the significant wave height are observed in the hurricane core among five wind stress evaluation methods and the differences are up to 12 m, which is in agreement with the general knowlege that the ocean dynamic processes under storm conditions are very sensitive to the amount of momentum exchange at the air-sea interface. However, it is the depth-induced energy dissipation, rather than the wind energy input, that dominates the wave height in the shallow water region. A larger value of depth-induced breaking parameter in the wave model results in better agreement with the measurements over shallow water.
引用
收藏
页码:893 / 907
页数:15
相关论文
共 45 条
[1]  
Amante C., 2009, NOAA TECHNICAL MEMOR, P19, DOI 10.7289/V5C8276M
[2]  
Andreas EL, 2004, J PHYS OCEANOGR, V34, P1429, DOI 10.1175/1520-0485(2004)034<1429:SSR>2.0.CO
[3]  
2
[4]  
Battjes J.A., 1978, P 16 INT C COAST ENG, P569, DOI [DOI 10.1061/9780872621909.034, 10.1061/9780872621909.034]
[5]   A third-generation wave model for coastal regions - 1. Model description and validation [J].
Booij, N ;
Ris, RC ;
Holthuijsen, LH .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-OCEANS, 1999, 104 (C4) :7649-7666
[6]   A High-Resolution Coupled Riverine Flow, Tide, Wind, Wind Wave, and Storm Surge Model for Southern Louisiana and Mississippi. Part I: Model Development and Validation [J].
Bunya, S. ;
Dietrich, J. C. ;
Westerink, J. J. ;
Ebersole, B. A. ;
Smith, J. M. ;
Atkinson, J. H. ;
Jensen, R. ;
Resio, D. T. ;
Luettich, R. A. ;
Dawson, C. ;
Cardone, V. J. ;
Cox, A. T. ;
Powell, M. D. ;
Westerink, H. J. ;
Roberts, H. J. .
MONTHLY WEATHER REVIEW, 2010, 138 (02) :345-377
[7]  
Chen CS, 2003, J ATMOS OCEAN TECH, V20, P159, DOI 10.1175/1520-0426(2003)020<0159:AUGFVT>2.0.CO
[8]  
2
[9]   Enhancement of wind stress evaluation method under storm conditions [J].
Chen, Yingjian ;
Yu, Xiping .
CLIMATE DYNAMICS, 2016, 47 (12) :3833-3843
[10]   Modeling hurricane waves and storm surge using integrally-coupled, scalable computations [J].
Dietrich, J. C. ;
Zijlema, M. ;
Westerink, J. J. ;
Holthuijsen, L. H. ;
Dawson, C. ;
Luettich, R. A., Jr. ;
Jensen, R. E. ;
Smith, J. M. ;
Stelling, G. S. ;
Stone, G. W. .
COASTAL ENGINEERING, 2011, 58 (01) :45-65